Is anybody else having trouble connecting to UOGuide today?
Thanks. I don't log in to UO as much as I used to.Ben down all week.
Been on and off this weekBen down all week.
Not to mention the official UO Wiki is confusing to even navigate.It is shocking how reliant this game it on that site...I can't believe that UO doesn't have the same information relayed in some form one way or another...it is insane.
I disagree, uo.com is much more up to date and it can have “some” more accurate info, but as someone just mentioned the navigation IS horrible, i wish they could add calculators that would be cool, those “3x1.5xtactics-swords/300+eval” are uselessIt is shocking how reliant this game it on that site...I can't believe that UO doesn't have the same information relayed in some form one way or another...it is insane.
Everybody needs to remember that the uo.com wiki is basically authored by a single UO player (apart from patch notes).I disagree, uo.com is much more up to date and it can have “some” more accurate info, but as someone just mentioned the navigation IS horrible, i wish they could add calculators that would be cool, those “3x1.5xtactics-swords/300+eval” are useless![]()
Like "Let's not add information to the wiki and have every player find out by himself". WTF.I guess the same way most of us have, by trial and error. There has never been a comprensive guide issued - the devs like us to find things out for ourselves
Wayback Machine can also be useful to find some things not on the current Stratics, as well as snapshots of fan sites no longer around.Well, we do have a wiki here at Stratics, though UO is far too huge for me to build it alone. Anyone can edit; I'd welcome any contributions!![]()
BUT BUT BUT aren't you suppose to do it all by yourself just like UO.COM. Just like here you can submit info to UO.COM for the Wiki so please tell everybody to get off their high horse and submit info here and UO.COM.Well, we do have a wiki here at Stratics, though UO is far too huge for me to build it alone. Anyone can edit; I'd welcome any contributions!![]()
If anyone needs to do that it's the owner of UO Guide, who I will not name since he doesn't have a Stratics account anymore and cannot defend himself, who refuses to collaborate with any other website in any way because he wants to protect the ad revenue that goes directly into his pocket despite UO Guide being a community built effort. We tried to combine the Stratics, UO Guide, and official UO wiki's but he would not budge whatsoever unless he was the sole person in charge of all three websites.Just like here you can submit info to UO.COM for the Wiki so please tell everybody to get off their high horse and submit info here and UO.COM.
Mariah Posts: 1,031ModeratorChampion spawns: Champion Spawns – Ultima Online
- Not a single dungeon linked (do they even have pages?)
- No map locations whatsoever
- Not a single monster linked to its page (do they even have pages?)
Let alone strategic advice on templates, weapons, etc for the different champions.
Let's face it, the uo.com wiki is purely a cosmetic beginner wiki. I doubt there is any intention to provide deep insights into the game beyond this bit of feel good wiki.
Or there is some bigger picture to it that I don't grasp yet. But could go for hours wondering how little use most pages over there have and why they need to reinvent the wheel.
I am talking about the people here on Stratics submitting info to Stratics Wiki and UO Wiki just like all those people that did it for UOGuide. I said nothiong about UOGuide submitting his info. UO Players built UOGuide and there should be no reason that UO Players can not build UO and Stratics Wikis the same way by submitting info.If anyone needs to do that it's the owner of UO Guide, who I will not name since he doesn't have a Stratics account anymore and cannot defend himself, who refuses to collaborate with any other website in any way because he wants to protect the ad revenue that goes directly into his pocket despite UO Guide being a community built effort. We tried to combine the Stratics, UO Guide, and official UO wiki's but he would not budge whatsoever unless he was the sole person in charge of all three websites.
I disagree, uo.com is much more up to date and it can have “some” more accurate info, but as someone just mentioned the navigation IS horrible, i wish they could add calculators that would be cool, those “3x1.5xtactics-swords/300+eval” are useless![]()
Well, if anyone needs any help to edit here, please do drop me a line!I am talking about the people here on Stratics submitting info to Stratics Wiki and UO Wiki just like all those people that did it for UOGuide. I said nothiong about UOGuide submitting his info. UO Players built UOGuide and there should be no reason that UO Players can not build UO and Stratics Wikis the same way by submitting info.
Always been a fan of knucklheadsKnuckleheads.dk Some good calculators here
Yeah and give them honorable execution.Always been a fan of knucklheads![]()
Sent him a message. No response.Any news from jc about uoguide.com?
Does anybody has contact?
Well this is quite the choosing beggar comment. "He just needs to be the one to do all the work and submit all the information in exchange for making less money". Yea what an amazing offer!!!!If anyone needs to do that it's the owner of UO Guide, who I will not name since he doesn't have a Stratics account anymore and cannot defend himself, who refuses to collaborate with any other website in any way because he wants to protect the ad revenue that goes directly into his pocket despite UO Guide being a community built effort. We tried to combine the Stratics, UO Guide, and official UO wiki's but he would not budge whatsoever unless he was the sole person in charge of all three websites.
You misread. He would only accept if he was the one who did all the work. He did not want the community involved. Only his opinions and formulas are correct. Stratics is a community effort.Well this is quite the choosing beggar comment. "He just needs to be the one to do all the work and submit all the information in exchange for making less money". Yea what an amazing offer!!!!
That's why I had rather liked to see a new wiki on a neutral platform like Wikia.You misread. He would only accept if he was the one who did all the work. He did not want the community involved. Only his opinions and formulas are correct. Stratics is a community effort.
I for once am looking forward to doing the same work 3 times and arguing with Petra whether your input is worthy or not lol.I am talking about the people here on Stratics submitting info to Stratics Wiki and UO Wiki just like all those people that did it for UOGuide. I said nothiong about UOGuide submitting his info. UO Players built UOGuide and there should be no reason that UO Players can not build UO and Stratics Wikis the same way by submitting info.
That is not correct. I do add information on uoguide if I search for something and didn't find it. After finding out how something is, work, looks I add it.He did not want the community involved.
That's exactly my point. You don't need any tips or forum posts explaining UOGuide. But instead of trying to improve the uo.com wiki, feedback is rather greeted with a manual how to use the official wiki and by adding another chapter to it. It's closer to one player's personal blog than a real wiki.Mariah Posts: 1,031Moderator
8:55AM Flag
Other navigation tips:
Always scroll to the bottom of a page, several times 'child' pages are linked there, for example
Champion Spawns – Ultima Online
has at the bottom:
Some pages are 'extra' to main pages, consolidating information in a different way, for example
- Champion Spawns - Felucca Dragon Turtle
- Champion Spawns - Felucca Dungeons
- Champion Spawns - Felucca Lost Lands
- Champion Spawns - Other Facets (no pvp)
- Champion Spawns - Stygian Abyss
- Special Rewards from Champions
Artifact & Collection Spell Damage Increase items – Ultima Online
is a list, requested by players, gleaned from the main artifact pages. The page for the relevant collection is linked in the right hand column. Following that link will lead you to the image and stats of the item.
UO is large and complex, it isn't always easy to decide which of the given categories a page should be in, the search function is often the easiest way to find what you seek, when used with the tips earlier in this thread.
And considering some of the ways feedback is given on these forums I would tell you to go to hell too. All info on UO.COM is being vetted to insure it is correct and I hope it is done here also. UOGuide did have disinformation on it at times and JC and others had to go in and correct it. That is the big problem with a wiki that allows anybody to add/change things.That's exactly my point. You don't need any tips or forum posts explaining UOGuide. But instead of trying to improve the uo.com wiki, feedback is rather greeted with a manual how to use the official wiki and by adding another chapter to it. It's closer to one player's personal blog than a real wiki.
You would be suprised how many mistakes in the UO.com wiki have been reported and how many are still unreported. It's vetted by a single person and I don't believe it's possible for a single player to be a master of all UO arts. Misinformation is not really a "big" problem and can easiely be handled by moderation. The DaoC wiki does not seem to face any issues either, despite being publically hosted at fandom.com. IMO that would also be the best solution for a unified UO wiki.And considering some of the ways feedback is given on these forums I would tell you to go to hell too. All info on UO.COM is being vetted to insure it is correct and I hope it is done here also. UOGuide did have disinformation on it at times and JC and others had to go in and correct it. That is the big problem with a wiki that allows anybody to add/change things.
That "single person" does not do that great of a job with the accuracy of the information.You would be suprised how many mistakes in the UO.com wiki have been reported and how many are still unreported. It's vetted by a single person and I don't believe it's possible for a single player to be a master of all UO arts. Misinformation is not really a "big" problem and can easiely be handled by moderation. The DaoC wiki does not seem to face any issues either, despite being publically hosted at fandom.com. IMO that would also be the best solution for a unified UO wiki.
Reading the posts you make. I doubt you know what is correct or incorrect.That "single person" does not do that great of a job with the accuracy of the information.GOD FORBID, you try to tell her something is wrong even in the nicest way possible.
You'll get a rude, snotty reply for your trouble.
Apparently she doesn't make mistakes.
![]()
Pawain, Bite me!Reading the posts you make. I doubt you know what is correct or incorrect.
@obeeee he stole your line.Pawain, Bite me!
No, you wouldn't have. Both of those posts were reported and I closed both reports as no violation. Neither post attacked the other person in real life so they were not personal attacks, and neither of them were enough to be considered trolling, just an opinion on someone's posting style and a retort to it.If I said either of the last two comments, I'd get a mark for trolling.
BahahahaBoth of those posts were reported
Bruv, isn't it a shame? I mean, do people really get offended that easily? Maybe they should start giving infraction points out to the people that report nonsense. That would balance the game.Bahahaha
Sent from my SM-J337VPP using Tapatalk
That's unfortunate. And surprising. With population being what it is, surely that ad revenue can't be much?If anyone needs to do that it's the owner of UO Guide, who I will not name since he doesn't have a Stratics account anymore and cannot defend himself, who refuses to collaborate with any other website in any way because he wants to protect the ad revenue that goes directly into his pocket despite UO Guide being a community built effort. We tried to combine the Stratics, UO Guide, and official UO wiki's but he would not budge whatsoever unless he was the sole person in charge of all three websites.
I will just leave that here to underline why UO needs UOGuide. She just doesn't understand that nobody is going through the hassle of arguing typos or one sentence edits with her. Still she seems to wonder. Oh lord..Most recently I invited players to send me their favorite macros so that I could build a page of examples. My email, which I included in the invitation, [email protected] remains empty.
It's a bit more than that. The devs want to control what is and what is not in the wiki. This is why in the current iteration, everything is going through a gate keeper, just to make sure you are playing the game the way the devs want you to.That being said, a solo individual can only do so and so much, its the devs/broadsword job to hire someone to work on it, but they don't.