It's a shame you wasted your second post on this.
-
Hail Guest! We're looking for Community Content Contribuitors to Stratics. If you would like to write articles, fan fiction, do guild or shard event recaps, it's simple. Find out how in this thread: Community Contributions
-
Greetings Guest, Having Login Issues? Check this thread!
-
Hail Guest!, Please take a moment to read this post reminding you all of the importance of Account Security.
-
Hail Guest! Please read the new announcement concerning the upcoming addition to Stratics. You can find the announcement Here!
enough is enough time to nerf moving shots ROUND 2
- Thread starter XavierFromLs
- Start date
- Watchers 4
No one is forcing you to play one. I take parry off quite occasionally and do just fine vs dexers and archers.
Regardless of your stance on this topic, you might be the most annoying dude in this thread, providing absolutely no substance to the conversation. Post #3 mmmmmm.
Interesting half the replies here were about how virem should have had parry on.
I have provided more reasoning through the thread despite people making baseless claims or interjecting at the end of the thread.
But keep the post count going strong.
Well if you look at the video he gets hit 50% of the time with no parry. If someone wants to get hit less, then of course add parry. That does not mean he is forced to add parry. A 50% hit ratio is where it should be.
In one v one situations, the only time an archer would have a chance at killing me would be stacking mortals. Which, I think needs to be addressed. But that is mainly just how overpowered mortal is; not archery.
Your so funny.
Sure lets make a comp bow 3.25s give it Para/Dismount and running shot
and lets move AI to the reg bow in replace of para.
Id be fine with that. And if you think running shot is stronger then dismount or mortal then you are a fool
And like i said before. Maybe if you werent running all the time maybe you wouldnt be crying about running shot as much.
Ok, you use different templates when pvming, I can see that. Even though a sampire would be the most efficient at just about everything pvm-related.
That's the point, everything needs parry except the skill that can't use it -Archery.
If that's the case you'd have the same problem with melee dexers stacking mortals, confirm?
Yup, that sounds good. That puts AI/mortal on a slower swing speed than the Soul Glaive and and a lower moving shot damage on comp bow. Great idea.
One vs. one isn't the problem. It's the ability to get to 30 damage running shots on a cursed target at 1.25 seconds. Which resulted in forcing everyone to play the same template two templates.
One archer is not hitting every 1.25 seconds for 30 damage. Even with just a weapon skill on the defender.
The only way this happens is if RNG gets a lucky streak.
Ummm..yes. lol. That was very clear in my post.
lucky streaks are quite common especially after HLD
I see no mention of melee what so ever. However I do see Archery & Mortal Strike. If Mortal strike is overpowered, then by nerfing mortal strike, archers are still overpowered and mortal strike would be even less useful for melee.
The only thing that's clear is Archery is overpowered. Your words.
Parry is overpowered, can we nerf parry and then consider an archery nerf? Or would u rather parry mages just never be able to die instead
Not to mention parry getting one of the few actually good usable masteries
I agree with parry being overpowered, I'm in favor of both Archery & Parry (Parry + Wrestling or Anatomy) having tweaks at the same time.
I'm not in favor of parry mages either, a parry mage is actually better than an archer in one vs one.
It's not balanced either, but then you compare a parry mage vs a melee dexer and melee is even worse.
You know, Tactics is overpowered I think its stupid that you need it on every dexxer temp
I don't think you know how to read properly. I clearly stated the issue is not archery over powered it is mortal wound. I don't need to list out every melee template when I am replying seeing as how this is an archery thread. Make sense with your posts.
Maybe you should read what you posted.
Well it wouldn't be luck, hit lower defense changes the hit formula
I think you should have a re-read, bud. We were talking about archery specifically and I said the only thing over powered is mortal wound stacking with archery. Then I further went on to say that is not archery specific- but an issue with mortal wound. How can you not follow a simple post?
I only have a mortal problem with archery and gargs. You can fend off warriors with fields and confined space traps where a ranged player can just sit back in safety and keep blasting.
In some cases perhaps. Others not, and mortal is still a problem. It really needs to go back to the way it used to be where it can't be stacked or reapplied for 3 seconds.
It's a big problem I agree. There needs to be a chance to miss it completely.
Then of course when that happens, remove curse and the mystic heal will be overpowered. I guess you just can't win!
edit: 4/6 remove curse already is far too overpowered, but it will be even more so.
wunhandwayne
Visitor
Doesn't need nerfed, but thanks for bump on a dead thread where it has already been decided that moving shots are fine.
I just read this.
Your logic is that a ranged player can hit you from afar, then you say that if that person was a warrior you could just sit in fields and hit them from afar so thats fair but the ranged dexxer can do it so its not fair.
no it hasn't been decided as fine. that's just your opinion.