<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
I like how you state 3-5 waka and still havent realized that KOS produces the same number as Waka. Also if you are implying that we suck Zarc I think you need to re-evaluate things considering me and you can fight for 5 min with neither me nor you dieing so are you saying that you suck aswell? considering we are about equal level id say.
[/ QUOTE ]
Where do people get this whole "one person is everyone" mentality? Ex: FOO is not Zhuang Foo. KOS is not Strung Out. I am not Waka. Jesus. I fully realize that you guys generally don't field more than we do. Notice how I also mentioned MOO as well? Reading comprehension ftw, m i rite?
Our fights have never had an outcome because you have ALWAYS called in for backup. I even called you on it one time and you said it was because "fighting [me] is annoying". In my book that counts as a win for me, because you're either A) not good enough to finish the fight or B) too impatient to switch into different combos than those [censored] ones you normally use (tbh i'm pretty sure that whatever combos you would use would be just as bad as those).
If you ever want to throw down in an enclosed area, I'll gladly do it. Only rule is you can't call for backup, lol. Also no archers lol.
PS. now that I think about it I don't know of a single decent player in KOS. Name one (and no I don't think you are decent). As a team you guys blow. It's amusing because whenever you guys die in a fight, you come back on your archers (and still lose ><
.
PPS: If you didn't notice from my original post (which you didn't because your reading comprehension sucks), I was pointing out the flaw in Si Foo's unified theory of steamrolling. His logic is that unallied a fight between both guilds would produce a "steamrolling" effect that would crush TBA. So if you look at it, the fight would be: Foo vs TBA.
He states that: FOO > TBA.
Thus, the excuse for losing is must be the allies added into the situation.
So, he is stating that: FOO + MOO + KOS <TBA + Waka/3f.
If taking away the allies reverses the sign, then it must mean that Waka/3f > MOO + KOS.
Simple.
Numerically, we could have it like this (average numbers fielded):
FOO + 10 + 5 < TBA + 5
so in order for FOO to end up being greater than TBA, 10+5 < 5.
Thus 5 Waka > 15 allies. That's how I saw his whole post in my head (granted this only took a few seconds to think up). Kinda amusing. Now what I actually think about the subject may be different, but the rhetoric of Si Foo's post really is pretty hilarious. Diss to the allies eh?
[/ QUOTE ]
So you're saying that there are ONLY 5 Waka? I call BS, that is ludicrous. You're also saying that there are 0 3F?
Foo > TBA
Moo/Kos > Waka/3F
The reason why we are having probelms, is the overwhelming amount of necros when you combine TBA/Waka/3F. If you separate the necros in your alliance, then they can't hold a ridiculous choke point (which is the only thing you're good at). But don't worry, we won't be having problems for much longer, trust me.
[/ QUOTE ]
Btw the only necros 3F has are spawners. Are you getting owned by 3f spawners?