Nah I didn't watch it.... I was at the event myself... one helping of Hey Idiot was more then enough.Anyone notice 4:49 and again at 6:04 in the video ?
Nah I didn't watch it.... I was at the event myself... one helping of Hey Idiot was more then enough.Anyone notice 4:49 and again at 6:04 in the video ?
KEKEKEKEEKEKEKE, we did try that. It didnt work. The Idiot continued and the EM canceled the event.If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were levying a threat. And the "soft-hearted, low or no punishment thought BS" is actually open-mindedness. You should try it.
No, it's really just the same people over and over, at least on Atlantic. I don't begrudge them it, but I also don't feel like EA is obligated to pay their rent for them. More than once I've seen Messanna and/or the EM insist to a complaining crowd that the drop mechanism is impartial and unbiased, and I believe them. I just don't care.This is a myth, the kind of myth that helps to create a philosophical space for griefing.
I'm not sure how you think these are even remotely similar things. The events are there to provide entertainment for the playerbase. If your argument is that for a certain subset of players, preventing the event from moving forward and doing everything they can to get in the way of the event, and to chastise, berate, and belittle EMs and players alike is the entertainment being provided to them, then you're way off base. EM Events are not entertainment at the expense of others, they are entertainment for the purpose of the enjoyment of others. Griefing comes at the expense of others.I didn't say that I agree with how they chose to play, but your cries of griefing are just as subjective as my classification of playstyle.
You refer to something that was in the past, and while I agree that stealing was not griefing, as the skill was doing exactly as intended, there were definitely exploits involved in the stealing skill that were used in the early days to prevent the remainder of the stealing skill from functioning as intended. For instance, stealing something and tossing it directly in the bank before the other person could call guards was against the notion that players were generally safe in town as long as they were paying attention -- thus you suddenly could not put stolen items in the bank until your flag wore off. However, stealing has been left fairly alone with regard to other players for the majority of UO's time; stealing is simply incompatible with Trammel, and so you can't be stolen from in Trammel. Stealing has functioned in largely the same manner for the majority of 15 years in Felucca -- there's just no one to steal from.Many players whine that the stealing skill is griefing, so instead of thinking of ways around it (such as being careful with your items) they cry until insurance is adopted.
Others might call it respecting the event moderators and doing what they are asked. "Metagaming" is certainly an issue with EM events, but that does not equate to it suddenly being okay to ignore them and grief them and demand items and tell them that they're plotline is stupid and stand on them and harrass them. You're not even working with equivalent comparisons here. It'd be one thing if a "griefer" was standing around "in character" and interacting with the EM NPC, but even then, if the EM asks for space, it's respecting the game and doing what one is asked. Think of it this way... Dungeons & Dragons is a roleplaying game. When the DM asks you to roll a die, that's "metagaming," but you don't refuse to roll the die because the DM will simply kill your character or roll the die for you. There are certain conventions in any game that EVERYONE obeys. In UO, one of those conventions definitely should be, "If an EM asks you to do something for the sake of an event, YOU DO IT."I'm suggesting that if someone is refusing to follow an NPC's instructions by not getting off of a roof, then handle it in-game, don't pancake and moan about people getting accounts banned. Why do you feel obligated to follow a character that is yellow and do everything they say? Some might suggest that that is metagaming, and outside of the spirit of the game, and that could be another man's "griefing" by trying to force them to follow the rules of some stranger that, when you mouse over them, they are invulnerability yellow.
Well, the thing is, you're absolutely 100% wrong in your defense of griefing. Please stop pretending that these activities are anyting but what they are. To call them anything else is a disservice to the remainder of the players of the game. Your suggestion that an EM event should have to move to a house where a player can be banned just so that they can continue with an event is ludicrous. Essentially you're saying that EM events should only take place in controlled areas.If it's not hacking or anything like that, quit whining and handle it in-game. The EM could just as easily have suggested that the event be moved somewhere that the offending character could not access, essentially a house he does not have access to, due to in-game heckling. There are ways to handle this in-game, and the knee-jerk THIS IS GRIEFING cry just doesn't suffice, sorry.
They could certainly be given the power to jail a player indefinitely until GM review. What powers are given to independent contractors, unsurprisingly, is up to Mythic, not to the playerbase.EMs cannot have those powers because they are no employees of EA. They are independent contractors. They will never have that power, so time to move on from that.
I suspect you would find that Mesanna disagrees in spirit and in practice about that statement. Realistically, it should fall to the GMs, but there isn't much by way of a GM staff at present. However, I'll compromise with you and say that there should definitely be a GM on duty at EM event times, and that an EM should be able to request GM intervention to handle disruptive players.Actually, the devs can't do anything about those players directly either. They have to call a GM to handle the players.
No, they really couldn't.They could certainly be given the power to jail a player indefinitely until GM review. What powers are given to independent contractors, unsurprisingly, is up to Mythic, not to the playerbase.
Probably not, since that is pretty much a direct quote from her. Admittedly, that was about 3 years ago and, while things change, I doubt that has.I suspect you would find that Mesanna disagrees in spirit and in practice about that statement.
Quite simply, that isn't going to happen. EMs aren't employees and you can't have non-employees doing things like that.Realistically, it should fall to the GMs, but there isn't much by way of a GM staff at present. However, I'll compromise with you and say that there should definitely be a GM on duty at EM event times, and that an EM should be able to request GM intervention to handle disruptive players.
But, for the sake of simplicity, my "perfect" response would be for the Developers to give the EMs a tool that jails a player with a box for a reason that the EM enters in, places the player in jail until a GM can attend to him/her (which is moved to the front of the queue), and then, based on that player's record, it becomes a 24-hour, 48-hour, 72-hour, and then permanent ban. Give 'em three strikes, and if it happens again, goodbye.
Make the technology work for the EMs, but give the EMs the power to initiate against nuissance players.
No, they are NOT. They are independent contractors.Actually EMs are employees. Part time it's true, but employees nonetheless. EA can't use volunteer staff in any context after the debacle some years ago
So the hardcore cross-sharders are making more money off the deal than the EM is.Yes, if I remember the posting right it's $10 hour for a maximum of 20 hours a month.
I don't know why this is so hard to implement, people have been complaining about this ever since the beginning of EM Events!!!/Signed. Just give the EM power to tele the offender to jail for 30 mins. Its not too excessive.
As the culprit come forward , welcome to ignonre world.That's horse poo! If I want to sit atop a bank then your EM event is interrupting my game play and you should have a ban on your account. I like to go to champ spawns but sometimes they get raided. I ask them to leave so that I can continue with my event. Those raiders are ruining my game. I should be able to have a ban put on them under the same rule set then.
*It was not me who was on the bank nor do I play on ATL
There are plenty of other locations that are available and if I decide not to leave because you want to use an occupied space, tough.
EM's should have access to areas where they can stand and talk to those at their events without the masses able to get into the same space. If they are going to use a common area then those not attending/ participating the event should not have to move or leave so that the event can take place.
EMs with the power to ban is plain stupid. Squelch, perhaps, but to ban, no thanks.
Tell that to Mesanna... I have seen her take direct action several times at EM events and at Player Run events.Actually, the devs can't do anything about those players directly either. They have to call a GM to handle the players.
They are contractors - but they are "Authorized" to host events on behalf of EA/Mythic/UO. The rule seems to apply in every way.Actually, EMs aren't authorized personnel. They are independent contractors, not employees.
They could certainly have the power to telestorm though and have done previously. I remember players being whipped away with a single lightning bolt effect in the original EM program.EMs cannot have those powers because they are no employees of EA. They are independent contractors. They will never have that power, so time to move on from that.
From the EA TOS:Griefing is a playstyle...
LOLWhat was the sword from the Magincia Invasion that had a chance to telestorm players to another facet? How about giving them one of those that actually works 100% chance and have it telestorm to a no-recall zone like Fel-Lost-Lands so the offending player has to run back out?
In this case, personnel does not mean employees, just people authorized access to certain functions, areas, etc.Actually, EMs aren't authorized personnel. They are independent contractors, not employees.
Yes sir, Lets be honest.... do you really have fun when some jack in the box stands on an EM and spams VICTORY after he leaves like a crazy tween? NO YOU DONT (unless you are....). Honestly the ONLY people that thought Hey Idiot was cool yesterday are 13 year old girls. Which I would bet several accounts with castles is what he was aiming for.Griefing is a playstyle, has been since day one. Just because they added tram does not prevent rogues from enjoying the game too and they should be able to enjoy it in their own way. Where is it written that EM events are sacred cows that should not be interrupted? Not everything is my little pony, this is UO where the players write the story good or bad.
Let's be honest, do you seriously have fun with 100+ players crammed onto one screen trying to kill something they can't even see without using an all names macro? No, you don't. You do it for the pixel crack and the gold. EM events need this kind of drama to make them interesting, so stop whining.
They crowd around the EM or the items he's placed for the event so that they are hidden from the players trying to take part in the event. Flapping gargoyle wings & pets are very effective at this. The griefer's can also talk and cast spells to mix in with the text of the EM's speech to make it impossible to read on screen. With the journal colors often leaving the journal text colors very hard to read, it's not much help either. Greifer's win, event participants lose.Why couldn´t the EM start the event? How did people on a roof hinder it?
One of the many reasons I stopped attending EM Events. A failed program as far as I'm concerned.Atl just had an EM stop an event because "PLAYERS" refused to do what he asked. Simply for them to stay off a roof so he could conduct the start of the event.
Until the EMs have a way to make the childish brats behave, the events are pretty much a waste of time to plan and try to have happen.One of the many reasons I stopped attending EM Events. A failed program as far as I'm concerned.
I could go with this. One per account, and still transferrable to other shards? One per account would make them not quite as coveted, since they'd wind up in more hands than the heretofore lucky few.I rather like the occasional token representing my participation at an em event. I have several worth many millions that I have no interest in selling. I do not care if they are worthless either -I'd still keep them just the same. To that end, make sure em event items are worthless by leaving up clicky vending machines for several days and put no limits on how many a person can get. Those that want an item can get one, but it will be virtually worthless.
even better, permanently place a clicky statue in reward hall and let anyone get any item from past events -as many times as they want to.
Tell you what. After 11 a.m. on March 17, in Manhattan, try crossing Fifth Avenue at, say, 45th street.That's horse poo! If I want to sit atop a bank then your EM event is interrupting my game play and you should have a ban on your account. I like to go to champ spawns but sometimes they get raided. I ask them to leave so that I can continue with my event. Those raiders are ruining my game. I should be able to have a ban put on them under the same rule set then.
*It was not me who was on the bank nor do I play on ATL
There are plenty of other locations that are available and if I decide not to leave because you want to use an occupied space, tough.
I'm not in favor of giving EMs more power to deal with specific troublemakers. To me, this just injects poison into the system. It gives griefers a larger platform to shout from as wrongly punished and enhances their ability to elevate complaints to management, even over Mesanna's head. And that will roll back down on her. Eventually if someone were determined enough, learned how to push EM buttons, and created the right environment, they could bring the entire system down. Posting video here to rub salt in the wound and generally **ss in everyone's wheaties. Nothing good will come of it.Can an event be designed that is "grief" proof?
If EM's did have "more power", when during an event would they have time to use it? If any of you have ever run events before you must know that they are kinda involved... it is hard to run on the coordinator side, yet so simple to disrupt.
The "you" in this post is rhetorical, I'm not calling TBH out, just addressing those that take this stance.Let's be honest, do you seriously have fun with 100+ players crammed onto one screen trying to kill something they can't even see without using an all names macro? No, you don't. You do it for the pixel crack and the gold. EM events need this kind of drama to make them interesting, so stop whining.
I agree that it's unlikely, but, they certainly could do so if they wanted to. There's nothing other than Mythic's own policies preventing it. They are paid contractors, and giving them tools to enhance their jobs is not a bad idea.No, they really couldn't [...] Quite simply, that isn't going to happen. EMs aren't employees and you can't have non-employees doing things like that.
Well, like I've amended myself to include, I think there should be accountability to prevent abuse. Let's face it... a player gets banned and he comes here and cries his sob story anyway. That won't change. What might change is the number of griefers attending events, and that would be a good thing.Give them the power to remove troublemakers from their events and said troublemakers are guaranteed to be on here next day claiming the EM evicted them for no reason so that the EM's 'buddies' got all the goodies.
Wrong, ding, thanks for playing anyway.Griefing is a playstyle, has been since day one. Just because they added tram does not prevent rogues from enjoying the game too and they should be able to enjoy it in their own way. Where is it written that EM events are sacred cows that should not be interrupted? Not everything is my little pony, this is UO where the players write the story good or bad.
Sure, I gripe about the dragons and the flappy gargoyles every week obstructing my view and making it difficult to target things, or when I don't get looting rights because something's borked with the looting right system.Let's be honest, do you seriously have fun with 100+ players crammed onto one screen trying to kill something they can't even see without using an all names macro? No, you don't. You do it for the pixel crack and the gold. EM events need this kind of drama to make them interesting, so stop whining.
Well said and spot on.Griefing is a playstyle, has been since day one. Just because they added tram does not prevent rogues from enjoying the game too and they should be able to enjoy it in their own way. Where is it written that EM events are sacred cows that should not be interrupted? Not everything is my little pony, this is UO where the players write the story good or bad.
Let's be honest, do you seriously have fun with 100+ players crammed onto one screen trying to kill something they can't even see without using an all names macro? No, you don't. You do it for the pixel crack and the gold. EM events need this kind of drama to make them interesting, so stop whining.
Lol.I just wanted to weigh in on this in case Mesanna is reading this. It's not only the "giveaway" events that things like this happen. At Lord Blackrthorn's coronation there were spammers and other annoying behaviors going on.
I think the gripes here are legit. I don't know what the answer is but events do need to be monitored and the problem children removed. I also haven't attended a lot of the events because of the annoyance factor. Something needs to change so that those who want the fun and interesting experiences can enjoy them.