Yeah, its so awesome that other players can make things that gives advantages over other players who can't get it. :/
Everyone can get it.Yeah, its so awesome that other players can make things that gives advantages over other players who can't get it. :/
Sure, everyone can download it...I can download a WoW mod too. But neither one of them will work with UO:CC, which is the only UO there is and as such they are in the same gameworld as me and have advantages over me in the game through this.
Oh really? You found a way to make these mods work in UO:CC?even LC can download and use it...
ANYONE can download the EC client and use any of the FREE mods. You are using half-truths to spread lies and somehow denigrate something good that the Modders have done for us. if YOU or anyone else chooses not to use the EC and these free mods, that is YOUR choice not the use this great client and has nothing to do with the CC.Oh really? You found a way to make these mods work in UO:CC?
That's your prerogative. You can choose CC, UOA and UOCartographer, or you can choose EC and custom UIs.Oh really? You found a way to make these mods work in UO:CC?even LC can download and use it...
Anyone can download and use the EC too. I don't see a problem. If you want to use the mods, you have to use the client they go to. I know for a fact that there are things the CC with UOA can do that the EC cannot. It's a trade off. Each client has its strengths and its weaknesses. Anyone is free to use either or both if they want. Therefore you're complaining about a non-issue.Sure, everyone can download it...I can download a WoW mod too. But neither one of them will work with UO:CC, which is the only UO there is and as such they are in the same gameworld as me and have advantages over me in the game through this.
You and LC ought to buy a house together, I think you'd get along famously. There is no comparison between the mods available for the EC and what happened in the early years of UO.Not seeing Copper Enhanced in the downloads section of stratics. Must be talking about some 3rd party program.
Takes me back to the early days of UOA. How long did honest players not use it till they seen the words written in stone.
I can download and use WoW as well. That doesn't make WoW mods a viable alternative to UO.Anyone can download and use the EC too.
Now we're not having a real conversation.Its an alternative to UO, it is not UO. The CC is what UO is. The EC is an abomination of another game that happens to connect to the same servers.
Well hey, at least it's a legal advantage you don't have to pay $15 for. =PIts not something I think, it *DOES* give them an unfair advantage. It would be no different than if EA turned around and endorced a certain scripting program, then every EC user would complain that it gives CC users an advantage.
ditto.*shakes head*
*insert your favorite face/palm pic here*
My thought also*shakes head*
*insert your favorite face/palm pic here*
Every now and again you surprise everyone by posting something that isn't a troll. This isn't one of those times...The EC is crap.
UO = UO:CCThe EC is not an alternative to UO.
Its not something I think, its something it is. There's no question that the advanced options of the mods give advantages only found in cheat tools in the real UO.think the mods for it give players an unfair advantage.
Yeah, maybe from your point of view. Thankfully very few people share your beliefs.UO = UO:CC
Not UO = UO:EC
And those advantages are more open to everyone than the advantages UOA gives over vanilla CC, since the EC's free.Its not something I think, its something it is. There's no question that the advanced options of the mods give advantages only found in cheat tools in the real UO.
This ... for sure. EC graphics and movement make me ill, macros are (IMO) a tad more difficult to setup than they really should be. Mainly movement and graphics are my reasons for not using it.And those advantages are more open to everyone than the advantages UOA gives over vanilla CC, since the EC's free. ...
If/when you next try it, try turning the frame rate down to 10.This ... for sure. EC graphics and movement make me ill, macros are (IMO) a tad more difficult to setup than they really should be. Mainly movement and graphics are my reasons for not using it.
I beta-tested EC. Several persons in the Beta Forums mentioned the lousy graphics and even showed how just slight tweaks could improve them - without needing the CC graphics.The truth is, the CC is hindering development, and will continue to hold back any other client. It's buggy and old and graphics can't be improved because of it's age. New Users just aren't going to play UO and use the old CC, because it doesn't measure up to modern game engines.
Brave man.Kimi - I will try your suggestion. I have no problem trying anything that will allow me to really enjoy the client. Macros can be re-learned.
Now... any idea how to make that mount macro im after![]()
I'm not sure what you are looking for, but I posted a pet ball macro example to this thread. It can also be used to create a mount macro, you just target your mount instead of a pet ball when getting your object id. Right now it's the last post in the thread.To my knowledge, it can't be done.
But, that doesn't mean it really can't, I just don't know how![]()
There is a # at the upper right of each post. If you copy that link, it takes you directly to a specific post, such as the one you referred to.I'm not sure what you are looking for, but I posted a pet ball macro example to this thread. It can also be used to create a mount macro, you just target your mount instead of a pet ball when getting your object id. Right now it's the last post in the thread.
A cool, I didn't realize that. Learn something every day. Thanks.There is a # at the upper right of each post. If you copy that link, it takes you directly to a specific post, such as the one you referred to.
There are a couple of huge issues that I would like to see dealt with:The targeting systems works okay, but really needs some refinement - it's much better than the generic CC client, not as good as UOA yet. Sometimes the "Nearest" target isn't the nearest, and a couple other refinements as others have posted would be nice.
A cool, I didn't realize that. Learn something every day. Thanks.
There are a couple of huge issues that I would like to see dealt with:
1. When a current target goes out of range or disappears in some way it should "grey out", not be deleted as the current target.
2. When you attempt to target something that is out of range you should get a message that the target is not valid, and a cursor. You shouldn't lose the action that you took.
Yes I do that as well, but a lot of my spells are on current target and I have to click on the bar to reacquire the target when it becomes visible again or moves back into range. It isn't a big deal, but when you are pvp'ing sometimes a split second can be the difference between success and phailure...For no. 1.
using the lucifus interface i pulled the bar on the mobile drop down and that bar greyed out when i moved out of range.
It's been a while but I believe there is a range check in the CC so that you don't lose the spell. But I could be wrong about that. Or perhaps that is a feature of UOA.For no. 2,
don't you lose the spell in the classic client as well? just asking for clarification.
I don't have much of a problem with either of those things, but I'm not a great mage. I'm much better than I used to be, but I'd still say I'm a below average pvp mage.range checks a UOA feature but it never worked quite right for me anyway. I dont like the new targeting system where you autocast spells. In pvp battles you often have to change targets fast or hold your spell to sync a dump...that makes it hard.
Sure thing as long as the devs love the idea of never getting beyond the point they are now, by all means stick to the CC if you never want the game to be competitive again.UO needs one client. And the classic client is it.
You are right about that, but if you stick with it, it's worth the week or two of annoyance (actually it took me a good three months to become really comfortable with the EC, but I'm a slow learner...).It's a hard thing to adjust to... to have to completely change your play style from all the previous years to something else entirely, and it's the same game.