The only reason there is life on Siege right now is because of BFF and the other 2 pvp guilds maybe 3 who are having PLAYER made INSURANCE.
And I for one think that is great. Its human beings interaction with each other, making a treaty to behave a certain way. Player interaction, which is what I for one want to protect.
Funny how Freja is against insurance yet she claims to give peoples crap back for FREE.
And? Giving people their things back is not the same as the in game system of insurance.
So what? Ive been playing this game for 13 years, and I play close attention to what changes have what effect. Just because I can't pvp well doesn't mean that I can make observations and state opinions. There was a DIRECT correlation to the introduction of insurance, and the game starting to suck, ESPECIALLY the economy, which was basically destroyed because of it in tandem with tram. And if you notice there are pvpers who agree with what I say.
And half the people in BFF are against it but already are living by it.
No, they aren't. If you are talking about the low price buybacks that is a PLAYER mandate, which is fantastic. It doesn't effect anyone in the game but those who all agree to adhere to it.
Wake up people.
Anyone who is going to leave Siege has already done so.
They are playing OTHER shards.
That is incorrect. If they put in insurance I will cancel my accounts that day. This is not just crap talk, 50% of the reason I left LS was because of insurance. Tram being like 25%, and other various lameness account for the rest. Tram sucked balls and always has, but people still lost their stuff and needed it replaced, thus they needed other people, and needed to interact.
I want to see Siege grow and be back to what it once was.
That's not likely.
I agree on both counts. My opinion on the population is this: When the game had more players over all there were more people into siege, when the game lost a lot of players, the pop of siege went down accordingly. That is going to be how it stays, even if you add in all the bells and whistles to get people to transfer here while destroying the whole reason for the shard in the first place: To get away from all of that lame bullshot. I think the more we make the shard the way WE want it, the better shard it will be, and the more likely it will appeal to new players.
Stop being stupid.
No one said insurance is the answer for sure but I sure as hell know that one or two more arties here and there or a million is not bringing Siege back the way we hope it will.
Well, you seem to be suggesting that pretty actively actually by condemning people who are against it. And I for one think we need to stop worrying so much about what will get new people on the shard and actually start fighting for the shard WE want. Not the shard THEY want. After all wtf is the point in doing the latter when, again, we all came to this shard to ESCAPE those stupid systems?
You will still farm gold or items if you want to play otherwise you won't be able to kill anyone with a bad ass suit 1v1.
Insurance doesn't cange that really either.
You still need to farm and craft a little to keep up. It just cuts down on how much.
But the obvious and glaring difference that is completely plain to anyone is that while yes, people would still farm, but once they have thier good suit... they are done until it breaks which could literally be years. Insurance changed pvp very much, and would change crafting and pvm again if it were to be implemented here.
It just cuts down on how much. I know thats not important to you, but it IS important to many other people, and it is also important to other people to be rewarded in something tangible when they beat someone in pvp. That is not stupid.
I guarantee you crafters on this shard haven't even made half the items possible in this game because there is no market for them on siege.
How does that even matter? The point is the range of goods to be made and sold is MUCH wider than any other shard. Period. More transactions, more items = better economy = better community.
People cry that insurance will kill Siege when Siege is already dead. We are trying to bring it BACK to life.
Actually you are trying to change the shard, not bring what it already is back to life. And not change it for US, but change it for prodo shard players. I think the process is counter intuitive.
I respect everyone who wants to play without insurance. I also respect those who like me don't want it but would sacrifice to be able to play a game that we have come to love.
I on the other hand want to keep loving the game I love AND make it better for people who are unhappy. Insurance helps one group and relegates another to near uselessness.
I know that if we get dev attention we will make a change for the better weather its increased loot or whatever fix they will agree to.
Yeah but the more non siege ideas like this get suggested the more divided we look on what we want, and thus the less likely we are to get action from the dev team.
I appreciate peoples passion for this shard and share it. But remember that the game hs changed and will continue to change.
Adapt and overcome.
It has changed, but what is being asked for is to be more like UO has been, something I would AGAIN like to note we all came here to ESCAPE, not to change to something new.
I totally get that pvpers are dissatisfied, and I understand and agree with them most of the time, but sometimes we go too far and lose sight of what we are trying to get. I think that is happening here.