OMFG im not blaming hoff at allWhy are you blaming Hoffs, it's not his fail, most new blue SP players will go for the largest and most visuel guild, they would do that without NEW too
Yep that is very true.Why are you blaming Hoffs, it's not his fail, most new blue SP players will go for the largest and most visible guild, they would do that without NEW too
so he didnt play with them on hunts and stuff as a NEW emissary only recruitement and gear set up. so that means any hunting with NEW was done as his alternate character that they didnt know was him, hoffs correct? so why even bother with NEW.I guess I'm not understanding your question. As far as I know Natalia was used to guild people to NEW and get them started. Hoffs played with GIL. The two did not cross.
whether you intended to or not, it seems that everyone perceives that you have.OMFG im not blaming hoff at all
KK funny how things are percieved differently by different people. Again hoff's im just being misunderstood i never ment to offend you i hope you dont take it that way ive always respected you still dowhether you intended to or not, it seems that everyone perceives that you have.
look I don't know exactly how it was done, but it's been Gilfane policy for several years now to not actively recruit NEW to avoid this very accusation, and to give them a chance to look at other guilds without over shadowing unintentionally.so he didnt play with them on hunts and stuff as a NEW emissary only recruitement and gear set up. so that means any hunting with NEW was done as his alternate character that they didnt know was him, hoffs correct? so why even bother with NEW.
NEW's concept can only be held up if the emmissaries participate in hunting and getting them to know the shard not just recruitment. When you recruit to GIL do you just set em up and let them play by themsleves im guessing not you play with them. New should have someone willing to do that or lets completely get rid of it
its not hoffs fault that he was trying to help NEW, its not shalimars fault that shes got RL situations that must be handle but i do think we need to get rid of NEW because the idea behind NEW cant be upheld unless someone devotes themselves to only helping NEW players as a Main Character not as a alt which there only duty is recruitmentlook I don't know exactly how it was done, but it's been Gilfane policy for several years now to not actively recruit NEW to avoid this very accusation, and to give them a chance to look at other guilds without over shadowing unintentionally.
If you aren't blaming Hoffs, then who exactly are you blaming?
Freja, we will not be starting any alternative to NEW. It will just be the same **** all over again. If someone else wants to do that, that's fine, but we won't be involved.
Yeah you are right about the time of year I brought that up before. I mean like I said before even when Siege was much more active activity would drop off sharply at certain times of the year. Not to say it isn;t discouraging to see the drop in activity especially with us really needing more population but it does help put it into some perspective. Also I am looking forward to seeing more of you around and hope you guild sticks it out for the long run!Oh boy.
Well, speaking as a new citizen on Siege, I must say that I find a lot of the discussion to not be what I have experienced. I have been accused of wearing rose-colored glasses, hehe.) I will speak only about what I have personally encountered.
NEW Guild was a safe place to learn about the culture & community of Siege. It is difficult to find an Emissary during the times that I play. I see the Portal Hub as a great service. I was given a plot to co-own along with Luka & Dionysus (Patron of the Amazons) until I can clean up my Baja homestead. GIL is very active & there are usually at least a pair of GIL around & vocal in Gen Chat so I can understand why folks want to join them - they are friendly, helpful, and online. I am grateful for all information. I heed warnings but make my decisions based on my personal experience. I know the game mechanics and how to gain skill, fame, karma, etc... what I did not know was where the active vendors are, Guilds, RP, etc... so I glad that I was shown around the different communities.
Also, it is summer folks. *winks* Vacations, active military service, school, work... all of things have stalled the migration of three friends from coming to Siege. They will come though *narrows eyes at Mark, Chris, & Thomas* Just yesterday, I saw a BRPA (Baja Role Playing Alliance) member around Luna Bank; I could not find them to talk but I saw them pop up every now & then.
Perhaps we should have an active Guild Showcase or Faire. I plan on hosting some events in future but my time is limited this summer season too.
And, yes, the slow RoT is really rubbing me the wrong way. I mined on my Mule for an hour last night & gained a full 0.4. *shrugs*
Overall, I am having a blast & so are my teammates so we will be around as PvP fodder or goody tw0-shoes supporters. Our Guild is kinda in between those two & everything in between. We might join Minax because she is the only female faction leader in UO Storylines but that will be a group decision.
Thank you all for listening. We will see in Sosaria.
Lady Clodia, Amazon Regent Priestess
I will do thatFreja , i too believe NEW is worth keeping alive . perhaps make NEW2 till you can oficially get it back from shalimar
if you go thru with this ill back you as much as i can with powerscrolls and whatnot .once you have a maibox make sure i get a rune.
I agree returning players will need to hang out with NEW but they should not be protected of the tag. The solusion here could be a title saying "I'm back" or something. To make the PK's agree to leave new members alone, you do need to show who are reall new to the shard and who is back or who not yet had found a guild .one thing tho i sort of disagree with . you mentioned no skills over gm . this might be a problem for returning players .
as we need players id humbly recommend you wave that part . returning players probably wont need as much help anyway , just time to re-learn and acclimate. . im sure many may find themselves skilled but hopelessly outdated. i believe we should help them as well. at least it would give them time to learn everyone ... and us them.
P.S. When you recruit on other shards, I don't think you should try to steer them into this guild or that - at that point. Just get them here with the 6 month challenge. Also, if a group like this was built, after the 'chat listening' period, you could post on that shard's board as well to announce that you are there to talk about Siege and to issue the challenge. [I do know a thing or two about 'promotion'! And I would volunteer for this myself, except I've got a book deadline now. I will continue to play Siege every night, but alas, it's just for an hour or so before bed. That being said, I could probably help in other ways.]I propose a radical approach. We build a group - with members from I4NI, O-S, Gil, and any other guild we can think of that plays this shard. Having the leaders of each of these guilds do this would be the ideal. Then.... *gasp* ... create a group of characters on every freakin' shard that UO has - with a guild named SIEGE (can you have 5 characters?).
And you recruit. Stay a week on each shard and rotate through. First, just listen to general chat a while so you can figure out who the strong players are and who the problem players are. Then specifically speak to those who seem to be the movers and shakers. *Challenge them* to come to Siege for 6 months - not 1 month, but 6. You want to build Siege - this is the way to do it.
We don't have the benefit of being able to "transfer" every month to a new shard. And I think that these new people should be encouraged, if at all possible, to build their own guild. Maybe ally with one of the existing ones. Or join an existing one if they wish. But the idea would be to recruit, help train, and get them into a guild.
Siege has great leaders - in all of our guilds. In fact, I strongly believe that Siege has the best players that UO has to offer - whether or not you 'see' them. We've been made soft in a way by NEW - because NEW has done all the work. But every guild leader on Siege would know how to help new players adapt to the shard.
So that's my radical proposal. Thoughts?
I like these ideas a lot. I am willing to do my part & join you in this project, dbolesny. Maybe we should hit Atlantic first & set up camp in Felucca to challenge the PvPers to test their mettle on an adult, anti-materialistic shard, lmao.I propose a radical approach. We build a group - with members from I4NI, O-S, Gil, and any other guild we can think of that plays this shard. Having the leaders of each of these guilds do this would be the ideal. Then.... *gasp* ... create a group of characters on every freakin' shard that UO has - with a guild named SIEGE (can you have 5 characters?).
And you recruit. Stay a week on each shard and rotate through. First, just listen to general chat a while so you can figure out who the strong players are and who the problem players are. Then specifically speak to those who seem to be the movers and shakers. *Challenge them* to come to Siege for 6 months - not 1 month, but 6. You want to build Siege - this is the way to do it.
We don't have the benefit of being able to "transfer" every month to a new shard. And I think that these new people should be encouraged, if at all possible, to build their own guild. Maybe ally with one of the existing ones. Or join an existing one if they wish. But the idea would be to recruit, help train, and get them into a guild.
Siege has great leaders - in all of our guilds. In fact, I strongly believe that Siege has the best players that UO has to offer - whether or not you 'see' them. We've been made soft in a way by NEW - because NEW has done all the work. But every guild leader on Siege would know how to help new players adapt to the shard.
So that's my radical proposal. Thoughts?
Probably true. Then the goal would be to just issue the challenge to as many peeps on the shards that we can find.Cherry picking players from other shards has met some pretty strong objections in the past. Best have a thick skin.
Macroing skills is one thing....scripting a completely different story.Heh, If you chase away the peple that are wanting to play just a few hours a week, because maybe they would like to jump in with a template that has some skills on it from the begining, Well get OSI to allow transfer. Because no-one who is only going to give a few hours a week to UO wants to just grind skills the whole time for months to get to there end game. Yet as soon as you catch a AFK'er the siege population gets all antsy and tries the darndest to avoid and not participate with those people. Yeah I understand your trying to protect your market. I get that. But how many part time players would you have if you took the same approach as the "prod" shards? You guys are bringing your shard to it's knees all on your own. You don't need any help from the outside for that. And honestly non will come to your aid in the long run, with such a straight and narrow approach. It's not real Life after all. relax and let people enjoy it. Not running them off slaughtering there toons and reporting them. Because yeah you might get someones account banned, most likely your just putting yourself on the annoyiong list for the GM's
Cheers.
And I do not realy see a reason anymore why the devs should not reimplement them for Siege.I wish advanced tokens would work for those that wished to use them. I probably have 50 or so taking up space.
Most important for me is, that the leaders I get do have some spare time to put in NEW2 and can agree with me and the rest of the team about the rules for NEW2 and how to make it work. Second, the leaders need to get along with the community, both the dark and the good side. There will be conflicts you have to solve in a mature. Lets see who is willing to help me with NEW2.I propose a radical approach. We build a group - with members from I4NI, O-S, Gil, and any other guild we can think of that plays this shard. Having the leaders of each of these guilds do this would be the ideal. Then.... *gasp* ... create a group of characters on every freakin' shard that UO has - with a guild named SIEGE (can you have 5 characters?).
Only the first month will be in NEW2 unless it is a player with very little playtime each week. Skill gain is way faster now than last I was running NEW and the reds want their target back, so one month is enough.And you recruit. Stay a week on each shard and rotate through. First, just listen to general chat a while so you can figure out who the strong players are and who the problem players are. Then specifically speak to those who seem to be the movers and shakers. *Challenge them* to come to Siege for 6 months - not 1 month, but 6. You want to build Siege - this is the way to do it.
I'm not Shalimar and my way may be a little different. I have to do it my way but it did work before. [/quote]Siege has great leaders - in all of our guilds. In fact, I strongly believe that Siege has the best players that UO has to offer - whether or not you 'see' them. We've been made soft in a way by NEW - because NEW has done all the work. But every guild leader on Siege would know how to help new players adapt to the shard.
The 6 month challenge is for them to come to Siege and *stay* on Siege for 6 months. So that would be one month in NEW2 and then 5 on their own or in a guild or whatever. But as it is, too many come for one month or two, and then leave. Shoot, maybe we could even come up with some sort of 'prize' for those who join or form a guild and stay for 6 months.Only the first month will be in NEW2 unless it is a player with very little playtime each week. Skill gain is way faster now than last I was running NEW and the reds want their target back, so one month is enough.
I barely have time to play as it is right now. Gilfane is successful because we have some very strong leadership, not because I'm around a lot. If someone in Gilfane wants to participate, that's fine, and of course we will help with the usual stuff if NEW2 needs supplies etc.*snip*
The 6 month challenge is for them to come to Siege and *stay* on Siege for 6 months. So that would be one month in NEW2 and then 5 on their own or in a guild or whatever. But as it is, too many come for one month or two, and then leave. Shoot, maybe we could even come up with some sort of 'prize' for those who join or form a guild and stay for 6 months.
You are a respected voice on the boards and I am not surprised that you have had success using the Stratic boards to recruit.
I also agree with you that this might well need to be a joint effort - with both the dark and light forces of the shard joining together to at least work on this one issue, which everyone on Siege would like to see addressed. The key now is to see if those others agree with us - Raptor, Sprago, Ian? Waiting to hear your thoughts. Yes, this would be frought with some difficulties. But the payoff in new players might be worth it. We get upset at EA because they do not promote UO and specifically Siege enough. But we can do some of it.
Yeah I agree but yes people will need to understand that such recruiting efforts will be met with quite a bit of negativty. Some people will not be happy about Siege players trying to take players from their shard. But it could have some success so I agree it is something worth discussing and perhaps modifying and what not. We are at the stage I think where the more "radicial" proposals are becoming necessary. Because EA is never going to promote Siege.I am not dismissing the idea by any means. Just adding a bit of knowledge. This idea has merit and should be discussed and developed.
Yeah some sort of incentive for those that stay would be nice. Yeah it will be difficult but it maybe worth it. And really at this point we need to take riskes such as perhaps this idea. And it may need to be modified a bit I donlt know but I really do think at this point it is worth looking into. Same with posting on others games boards. Though in those cases we will have to be careful to post on offtopic boards/boards set aside to talk about other games. Posting topics in the actual games main discussion forum is likely to just get the topics deleted and possibly us banned not to mention not really make a good impression with the games community. But if we are lucky and post on the correct forums we may get some people willing to at least give it a go for a little while.*snip*
The 6 month challenge is for them to come to Siege and *stay* on Siege for 6 months. So that would be one month in NEW2 and then 5 on their own or in a guild or whatever. But as it is, too many come for one month or two, and then leave. Shoot, maybe we could even come up with some sort of 'prize' for those who join or form a guild and stay for 6 months.
You are a respected voice on the boards and I am not surprised that you have had success using the Stratic boards to recruit.
I also agree with you that this might well need to be a joint effort - with both the dark and light forces of the shard joining together to at least work on this one issue, which everyone on Siege would like to see addressed. The key now is to see if those others agree with us - Raptor, Sprago, Ian? Waiting to hear your thoughts. Yes, this would be frought with some difficulties. But the payoff in new players might be worth it. We get upset at EA because they do not promote UO and specifically Siege enough. But we can do some of it.
Yep it is time to take action but yes we need a plan first otherwise the effort will fail. And yeah efforts to make the shard lively appearance is important. If people come here and see a bunch of unstocked vendors and plots just sitting there unfinished it really makes a bad impression and just reinforces the Siege is dead mentality.I believe people have tried recruiting from other shards, in fact a lot of our former Siege players went the other direction and now play Atlantic.
Maybe, in conjuction with promoting on other shards what we need to do is market Siege (UO) in other games, on their message boards, using a free trial, whatever method. Bring a positive message about the possibilities that exist in UO and Siege specifically. Maybe they have played WoW or Diablo or whatever and feel bored - give them a reason to try UO. A lot of folks may know a little about UO in general, but be unaware of Siege itself. We need a consistent and universal message. We need a list of selling points, why should someone play here instead of a different game or shard. We can promote the freedom/sandbox style of the game, housing - probably another major selling point compared to other games.
It seems silly, that we would be doing this and not EA, but I think we just have to sieze the day. No more waiting, lets take action, form a committee and have a plan.
Everyone can help in some way - make the shard lively, build a house, not a empty plot, put up a vendor that is stocked (even if just something minimal). We need to give a good impression and appearance.
Yeah it is probably time for a new poll but that poll does give us some general ideas of perhaps what we need to push for. The biggest one seems to be one char per account. And you know there was a time I would have said no way it would hurt the community! and crafters and so on! But at this point with almost everyone having multiple accounts and using tons of soulstones its really not going to hurt the community to allow more then one char here. Also allowing people to place a second house here would help though I think it shoudl be limited to small plots only. Also for those that complain about no recall and sacred journey we could point out the hub not to mention the public crystal portals they donlt totally replace recall and such but they certainly do help.I know this is perhaps getting a bit stale (it's from August 2011, how time flies), but here's a link to a poll that I started in UHall to find out which aspects of Siege that only the developers of UO have control over keep people from trying out Siege: What Keeps You From Trying Siege? | Stratics Forums . Maybe it's worth a quick review in case anyone's playing on trying to approach Mesanna about making any changes to Siege and Mugen to make them more attractive options for players, ex-players, and people who've never tried UO. Maybe someone would even like to start another poll along the same lines again, with more options this time around? (I think with the XenForo forum software Stratics uses now, polls can have more options than we had under the old software.)
A strong leadership is what make a strong guild.I barely have time to play as it is right now. Gilfane is successful because we have some very strong leadership, not because I'm around a lot. If someone in Gilfane wants to participate, that's fine, and of course we will help with the usual stuff if NEW2 needs supplies etc.