How unsurprising, a non-reply reply, all but admitting you can't refute what I've laid out. So just who is not being constructive, hmm? You keep gainsaying but saying NOTHING. Troll much?
Sound and fury, my friend. Sound and fury.
Here's what I get. You don't want your playstyle excluded from consideration. The original plan had these battles happening at shrines, and that would have been a lot more conducive to your UO life. But the rationale you lay out for not implementing this change is irrational because the change has already happened.
You won't or don't want to change your gear, template, playstyle, habits because you feel you should not have to, and that others won't want to either. I, on the other hand, say "Hey look, there are a bunch of open plots around moongates and towns in fel that are just right for a little vendor shop." And there is global in-game search now and all that jazz. So if you see more people are playing in fel, and a lot of folks that were playing mostly or only in tram seem to be working up the stealing skill and looking for neat things to do with those characters, you go right ahead and don't ensure the hammer you just paid tens of thousands in bribes to earn. Costs like ten gold, and if I was you, I would be making a macro to open the item insure menu, but I am not you. My whole point is, you could make better choices about how to productively use your time.
To defend your position against my dismissal of its validity, and my lack of desire to roll out all the reasons that I do not think your position has any hope of winning the day, justified or not, you bait. I have a game to play, I don't like the one you are playing, and choose not to participate. There might be something in that, that has application to the topic at hand, you can find useful.
Something else, it will be really hard to find folks that care about fel towns, if no one is there. Tree falling in a forest, you know.
There, a fairly full and reasoned reply. I wish you luck in all your other endeavors.