I can see both sides here...I would set more store by the players 'choices' if it wasn't already evident that people are bribing for votes again, the person already reported for this has a design that definitely did not get through on it's own merit.
As
@MalagAste said, 'if my design can't stand on it's own then I guess I have to keep working at it.' maybe we should all take a leaf out of her book. What exactly has anyone accomplished if they had to buy votes? Most of us have more dignity than that!
Personally I think a lot of people learned a hard lesson the first time around and now guilds/alliances are banding together to get something of their own through, in our alliance we had our own mini contest to decide which designs we would vote for.
Of course most people are making a building for themselves, it's exactly what they would want and that's fine, but it's not really going to sell well to the masses if it has serious design flaws, the Devs are aware this was meant to be a gold sink, right?
A blank cube with nothing inside and no windows is not a home, not by any standards. How can that be in the same league as some of the other well-though-out designs? But if a guild of 50 people all vote for it then what can we do?
Then there are the people who just want a Keep or Castle of the same type as we already have but made more practical, this category is harder to sell but you would think more people would like this, as it's what we asked for since Castles and Keeps existed. We have two really great examples of this in the final 20, both of these should do well in the voting.
For myself I don't need anything fancy, multi-coloured floors and fancy roofs are not really my thing, I just want something I can live in that I won't find irritates me a few months down the road. Practical is more important than pretty to me, but I do want a bit of both. Good luck to all the last 20 entries.