<blockquote><hr>
God forbid birma should build a case up.
<hr></blockquote>
Build a case from cross examining the defense's witnesses?! He only dug a deeper hole for himself! Some of the questions he was asking I should have been asking myself. He was winning it for us!
<blockquote><hr>
One Juror was kicked cause he thought it was more fun to kill himself over and over, Another was kicked because he thought he would take a much more active role than just listening and formulating his views based on what he heard. There was so much disruption I doubt anyone could actually concentrate, What's fair about it!. And how do you know we were losing when the jury hadn't come to a verdict yet. Did you have inside information from the jury.
<hr></blockquote>
Oh so you call that an UNFAIR TRIAL, where YOU GOT TO KICK THE JURORS WHICH YOU PICKED AT WILL. ROFL. And I knew you were losing because your attourney was a bambling fool! No offense.
<blockquote><hr>
One of those is my log, And I can speak for that one, I did not doctor any logs, Tell me what part is doctored and I will forward it onto you straight from ICQ itself.
<hr></blockquote>
Firstly, the defense was not briefed about any evidence in the form of icq logs. You cannot simply come up with key evidence halfway through the trial without informing the opposing counsel! Secondly, ICQ evidence is so easy to doctor it's laughable. I change my icq name to Saidin, tell you what you want to hear, then you simply save the log or take a few screenshots and Voila! icq evidence. The judge ruled on it, and declared it inadmissable.
<blockquote><hr>
There is that inside informations again. It sure isn't in any of my logs what they came up with. Are you sure the jury was impartial.
<hr></blockquote>
Actually I heard that from Caith ingame, right in front of you, AFTER THE TRIAL. I believe he spoke to some of the jurors and they expressed their opinion that Barima didn't have a case and that the defendant was not guilty.
<blockquote><hr>
So why do you attack VKR and Myself, You can't simply say it was a flop due to the amount of troublemakers. Instead you use it as an angle for vindicating your client whom you yourself looked like you doubted right towards the end.
<hr></blockquote>
Quiete simply because we were having a trial ON YOUR TERMS. It is my belief that we were winning. Then you called of the trial and claimed that it was unfair. How can it possibly be unfair if it was on your terms? Please point out the logic to me that having agreed completely to every juror, the judge, having complete control over the premises you can call the trial unfair. It was not unfair, it's simply poor sportsmanship. You felt you were losing, so you decided to cut your losses and call it off.
PS At no point did I doubt my client. On the one hand we have a well respected member of the community who has been trading real estate for YEARS, who has friends who have trusted him and know him. His version of what happened is simple, it was a deal of 18 million for a keep. On the other hand we have a player who has somehow been trusted with the guild keep and whose version of the events is that he decided to swap this keep for a castle in fel WHICH SAIDIN DOES NOT POSSES and agreed to take 8 million as bond for a trammel keep! He would have us believe that he is a complete fool! Trading a keep for a non-existant castle and agreeing to trade it for a bond of 8 million!
