O
Ole Cheapy
Guest
Take it to OT this is a games forum, and this is too far off the topic.
http://vboards.stratics.com/showthread.php?t=167278But we're unlikely to start a huge debate over LD's dental issues that will probably just devolve into an argument that the mods will have to lock anyway.
Is there something wrong with people having a difference in opinion?But we're unlikely to start a huge debate over LD's dental issues that will probably just devolve into an argument that the mods will have to lock anyway.
Modding is one thing but when you start playing God and thinking you have an insight on what others will do and say before they actually do it then you have let your modding responsibility go way too far beyond your lil delusional head IMHO.But we're unlikely to start a huge debate over LD's dental issues that will probably just devolve into an argument that the mods will have to lock anyway.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I haven't mentioned anything about a thread being locked, that is against ROC. Are you perhaps playing God and trying to forsee my intentions and motives without me actually commiting the crime? Shame on you! Besides, I wasn't even aware that a thread was locked. What thread? Where?I wasn't the one that touched your thread, and probably would've let it go a bit further myself, but that's not the point. Somebody else obviously didn't feel like the headache of moderating an OT thread, and I support them in their decision.
I believe we'll let this one slide because its presence won't create additional work for us. If it starts to, it will either be locked, or the problem posts will be removed if they exist for no other purpose than to complain.
Or maybe I'm just winging it, and know nothing about the other mods motivations.
About what? I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Don't try to throw your badge on now after realizing you can't win the fight without it. You are the one that stepped outside your shield. Classic.I never mentioned a thread that was locked.
Stop trying to foresee my intentions and motives.
Post about this again and I'll move this branch of conversation to its own thread, where it can be discussed on its own merits.
I was gonna ask you the same thing about making up a title to this thread and stamping my name on it as if I started this ridiculous thread. But I think I can see your motive.. so people don't see how poorly you handled the real conversation.Just for my own knowledge, what do you hope to accomplish from this line of discussion?
WTS?!?! WTF?!?! I pay for this game, it's my $13/month and therefore I pay for your salary, thus I should be able to do/say/behave what-ever and how-ever I want! Don't forget the customer is ALWAYS RIGHT!!!It wasn't a threat, it was a statement. You posted, I moved. No harm, no foul.
I was just saying that if you're gonna dance around words, dance around the correct words. I hadn't mentioned a locked thread, so you can't get technical about the locked thread I mentioned.
Just for my own knowledge, what do you hope to accomplish from this line of discussion?
It's your world, dawg.You mean the conversation where you quoted the same thing I said three times in a row?
I've changed the title. Does it now earn the Cheapy Stamp of Approval?
Also, you did start this ridiculous thread. It just wasn't created in this thread.
WTS?!?! WTF?!?! I pay for this game, it's my $13/month and therefore I pay for your salary, thus I should be able to do/say/behave what-ever and how-ever I want! Don't forget the customer is ALWAYS RIGHT!!!
**The preceeding rant was brought to you by: The reason I finally quit retail after 11 years.
Honesty is always a great example.Great way to set an example.
Your posts of late don't meet expectations either...
Okay, now you have me curious. I have watched Jeff Dunham and I can't place which character said that.... care to help me out???If you honestly thought that I perfectly matched Cheapie's posting style with my thread title, then I just don't know what to tell you. Except that maybe you should watch some Jeff Dunham to recognize the phrase.
Yet here you are.Stratics has always been a bad forum. The rules are enforced textbook. One time I was perma-banned 2 years after receiving my 3 day penalty for a rule I broke. I assume someone felt inferior IRL and had to have a powertrip.
Kelmo also has it out for me. I've received 5 or so infractions in the 3-4 month period that I played here last time. All of which were pretty much undeserved by any reasonable standards.
It's too bad everyone can't migrate to a forum that doesn't suck.
Naw. We all decided after the big Stratics crash we would take (almost) all folks back and let the new system sort 'em out.Probably my fifth stratics account.
Saying that will probably get me another perma though, no?
It's when he's just doing the stand-up portion of his act without any characters. The same bit where his daughter fills up for gas the first time.Okay, now you have me curious. I have watched Jeff Dunham and I can't place which character said that.... care to help me out???
Honestly the title doesn't match your posting style either, and oddly enough the title doesn't say "Renamed by Wulf2k." Ask any viewer of this forum before you started this post renaming game, most of us assume only the OP edits the title.If you honestly thought that I perfectly matched Cheapie's posting style with my thread title, then I just don't know what to tell you. Except that maybe you should watch some Jeff Dunham to recognize the phrase.
Also, look up the meaning of the word "Renamed".
Oddly enough, it doesn't mean "To leave the title as intended by the original poster".
Oh? Well not knowing what your expectations are, I am equally ignorant in how I failed to meet them. However, since there are potentially as many expectations as there are human beings in the world, if I claimed to be able to meet them all, I'd be in politics, and I administer networks.Your posts of late don't meet expectations either...![]()
Honestly the title doesn't match your posting style either, and oddly enough the title doesn't say "Renamed by Wulf2k." Ask any viewer of this forum before you started this post renaming game, most of us assume only the OP edits the title.
QZ may have been joking but she pointed out the problem. You're putting a quote into someone's mouth that was never said. No mod has done this before and it's a bit worrying. Yes you admitted it, but not until many posts further down, and the broken train of threads due to the move makes it hard to follow.
Cheapy may have had some tenuous claims, but he never once resorted to childish behavior such as name-calling against the mods or moving a Wulf thread and renaming the title to some kindergarten insult, making it seem as if Wulf wrote it. Even if he had the power to do so I doubt he would have.
It's one thing to move threads or lock threads, but you're crossing the line when you put words in people's mouths.
If you don't see anything wrong with that, then I don't know what to tell you.
I don't have a problem with the renaming, but what it was renamed to. It's a petty thing to do. We shouldn't have to memorize posting styles in order to know who said what. We should be able to take things on face value, that if a thread with Cheapy as the OP says X, then Cheapy named it X unless the title says otherwise.so was everyone assuming cheapy created a thread and thought it would be funny to call it "Re: Renamed/moved..."? or which part of Re, renamed and/or moved is that insanely hard to understand?
This could have been an interesting debate, but wasn't followed up on.Is there something wrong with people having a difference in opinion?
Had the seeds of a possible debate, but was shrouded in the gradeschool insults he wasn't making.Modding is one thing but when you start playing God and thinking you have an insight on what others will do and say before they actually do it then you have let your modding responsibility go way too far beyond your lil delusional head IMHO.
Here he's just randomly clutching at the technicality that he hasn't mentioned a locked thread. Good for him. I hadn't technically mentioned a locked thread either.Correct me if I'm wrong but I haven't mentioned anything about a thread being locked, that is against ROC. Are you perhaps playing God and trying to forsee my intentions and motives without me actually commiting the crime? Shame on you! Besides, I wasn't even aware that a thread was locked. What thread? Where?
I think HaHa is gonna have a blast with this one.In conclusion, you got your chocolate in my peanut butter.
And you still resorted to making him look childish. You would have been fine letting himself do that.In conclusion, you got your chocolate in my peanut butter.
Take it to OT this is a games forum, and this is too far off the topic.
Normally I don't agree with Sweeney about all the modding power trips, probably because I get away with a lot... But I agree here, pretty low in my not so humble opinion.And you still resorted to making him look childish. You would have been fine letting himself do that.
You've only justified the move, not the fact that anyone who glances at page one sees that Cheapy called the mods stupid, as if that's the only point of argument he had. In fact he never made that point, and you as a mod are making things up to support your view.
The renaming did nothing in line with the role of a moderator, and appears quite personal.
I don't have a problem with the renaming, but what it was renamed to. It's a petty thing to do. We shouldn't have to memorize posting styles in order to know who said what. We should be able to take things on face value, that if a thread with Cheapy as the OP says X, then Cheapy named it X unless the title says otherwise.
Giving the thread a childish title is jumping the shark in the debate, makes it look as if Cheapy is only making gradeschool insults (he wasn't), and weakens Cheapy's argument.
[\QUOTE]
and here i was thinking that the title was quite fitting
just out of curiosity, what would you have named the thread then after moving it?
*takes deep breath*I think HaHa is gonna have a blast with this one.
...and you havent regretted it since right?Naw. We all decided after the big Stratics crash we would take (almost) all folks back and let the new system sort 'em out.
Uhm yea, from what I can tell that's pretty much it... @Aeowyn if OT stuff having to do with players' RL is siege material, I think this qualifies as well.So you folks disagree with Wulf's style of trying to keep the discussion going? I would have just shut it down and been done with it.
Just saying.