You are "inconvenienced" because your first postings on this and other issues has been consistently "I haven't gotten this, therefore it is bugged/ill-designed/broken".
Well, apparently I was not able to express myself clearly which surprises me and quite some since I thought I had said it well clearly that I
already had received my 110 and so was not in need of another....
The fact that I expected a fishing order to bring a certain reward does not mean at all that I needed that reward. I say it
again, I
already had received a 110 fishing powerscroll earlier.
Nonetheless, it is my opinion that, since that fishing order was almost the very best order possible for that category (without dungeon fish), me, any player playing the game should have received 100% granted the best reward for that category, a 110 PS, even if they had already recived 30 110 PS earlier.
The point being, that it does not matter, as I see it, whether me or any other player needs a powerscroll or has gotten 3,000 of them already; the point is, as I see it,
that better orders should always bring home better rewards. End of discussion, IMHO.
I just see it as wrong,
very wrong, that worse rewards may bring home (as currently is....) better rewards than better orders.
Whether a player needs a reward or has already recived thousands before, this means nothing.
Better orders should always bring home better rewards, IMHO.
Is that clear enough, now ? My personal gain or expectations mean
nothing.
This is about a simple concept as I see it :
Better orders should always bring home better rewards.
Do I need to repeat it again ?
Once again, this is within your norm of whining and complaining, just like your constant rambling about how hard it is for you to get ML ingredients.
As in regards to ML ingredients, my point for alternate sources was supported by others among which, a moderator for the Stratics' Craftsman Forum, who is knowledged and experienced on the topic.
Quite frankly, it's sufficient for the time being that the Developers have breathed new life into fishing, and since nobody knows as of yet what the full range of benefits are to 120, it is too premature to start whining and complaining.
I am afraid that the news from those who have reached 120 Legendary fishing so far, hint that other than a little more chance to fish up rare fish there is not much else as a bonus for being a Legendary fisherman. The very least thing one would have expected upon reaching Legendary Fishing was to end having to pull up footware and we have been already told by several 120 legendary fisherman that they still fish up footware, unfortunately.
And, I am afraid I cannot say that all is fine and dandy anyways just because we have been given some new life to fishing. As it is now, I think, Legendary fisherman status is
incomplete.
It just makes no sense to me that a 120.0 Legendary fisherman gives the same bonuses as 100.0 GM fisherman saved the little increased chance to fish up rare fish.
Being a 120.0 Legendary fisherman (which I am
not, so, whatever extra bonus they had would
not benefit me in any ways....) should bring added bonuses, and quite some, as compared to lower skill level.
You may not be a legendary fisherman as of yet, but despite your claims, the underlying mantra is you want more, therefore you warrant it just because you want.
If I wanted it that much I would have simply bought a 120 PS and be done with it (I have the gold for it....). I have not done it.
Tells me wonder whether I really want or not that Legendary fisherman.........
You can support or not support whatever you choose.
In theory it seems but in practise when I try to raise a point about a game mechanic which I think is not working well or right or as I think it should, my right to support that opinion ends up where ???
However, the manner in which you convey it is no more than a self serving purpose not necessarily for where you are now, but for where you aspire to get to, and by God it had better be soon and at your convenience.
I guess different people have different ways to express their opinions. Others have theirs I have mine. This does not mean, though, that whenever I express an opinion of mine over a game mechanic which I disagree with, this is because of personal interest. I see something which I think is not working right and I say it whether that interests me or not.
Dissenting over something is an implicit call to make that something better, omproved. Fix what is wrong to make it right, better. This, regardless whether I may or may not gain anything from the fix. It is just for the fix itself, for the enjoyment to see something which was previously perceived as not working wel, to then be fixed and finally work better for the overall better being of the game itself.