If it needs trammel to live-let it die...
I agree.
Putting in 2 spells will not make people come to this shard that is just ridiculas, now fixing ROT i know will get people playing here!
If it needs trammel to live-let it die...
I want an easy button because I want a spell that was designed for the game from the beggining of the games implementation?sounds like everyone just wants an easy button put on
And the main difference...your attacker can go through the gate with you.
-Skylark
No, I saw that Skylarks post. But did you see the one explaining you could still do it without Real Skill. You dont need Real Skill to gate.And you said 50 magery and a scroll lets you cast gate, thats still 50 more points than recall with a scroll costs you - or have you not been on Siege long enough to realize that 50 points here makes a huge difference?
Live without it or run back to the easy shard where you came from.Like I said, I see your guys points on recall. Would you object to it if the recall min was increased to 100 for Siege?
Another one of the things that kills Siege.Live without it or run back to the easy shard where you came from.
Siege was born without recall for a reason.
We had been infected with to much Trammy code already, we do not need recall too.
Now unbless this damn runebooks!!!
I don't think Siegers are necessarily better than those who play other shards. I do think a lot of you are lost though and missing out, and that Siege is a better home for you...you just haven't experienced it enough to know what you're missing. However those Fel players who know all about Siege and continue to play elsewhere, where things like ROT and connection aren't what's preventing them playing here....I think of those people the same as I think of trammel players. Siege is by far the superior shard. That's a fact. There are plenty of reasons not to come here, like ROT, but there's no argument as to which type of shard is better. Where you might think Fel is where the true MMO players are and trammel is for the carebears, I think Siege is where the true MMO players are, those who enjoy greater risk, challenge, danger, player interaction, etc....and I include many Fel players among the carebears.Another one of the things that kills Siege.
The arrogance some of you show for being "hard core players"
Some of you act like everyone else is on Easy mode. Which is funny, because alot of the people on your shard couldnt hang with our shards even with all the gimped out gear.
Your playstyle is a different one and I rarely play Siege. Only when I am bored. Yet, you will never come on here and see me call any of you an "easy shard" or "******** shard"
Yet, some of your population has more arrogance then half the scripters and cheaters on my main shard.
I respect all shards for what they are. Different and Unique. Yet, some of you have this "better then everyone else" arrogance.
You can deny it all you want. All you have to do is look around at the dead shard to notice it. Many people I talk to from Atlantic (the games largest shard) and many of them avoid Siege not for ROT or lack of more then 1 character. They actually avoid it for the arrogance.
I have refrained from taking a cheap shots beforeon other threads.
Yet, I am growing tired of some of the arrogance in your posts.
I simply asked a question. Some of you chose to answer in a perfect way.
I dont even mind responses like:
Heavens No Limlight. Thats the most ********/stupid/idiotic idea ever.
What I despise is the people in this thread who act like they are better then everyone else. Ripping an idea is fair game and perfectly logical. Ripping an entire group of people and shard is stupid and childish.
Someone can lock this topic now as it seems there will always be arrogant people on Siege and asking simple questions is a open door for "shots".
Its sad too, because some of you on this shard seem like great people.
No, I wouldn't want that. It would be taking a step in the wrong direction imo. I still hold on to the hope that one day we will have a healthy population and our landmass will be reduced and we can remove all forms of instant travel, everyone having to walk, ride, or take a boat. At least how it is now though there's only mage gates and moongates. If people want to use a mage gate and don't have magery themselves, they have to rely on a fellow player to cast the gate, which is a good thing. 90% of people being able to gate would not be a good thing. And as it is there's plenty of people with 2nd accounts or soulstones who can gate when they need to. No thanks...we don't need more gate options.Well, an idea people on Siege might consider viable is addition of 2 new spells to existing casting skills, such as chivalry, and necro, that allows one to open a rift/portal, that functionally is the same as a gate in terms of anyone being able to enter/dispel and having similar skill level requirements & success rate for its respective skill as the magery gate spell. That would allow more classes of templates to open travel gates without easing any of the other requirements. The big question: do people actually want more people able to open gates, even if by doing so they must devote the same amount of skill points as mages with the existing gate spell?
-Skylark
Let's focus on one thing at a time. ROT. It seems likely a major ROT would above all other changes boost our population. Plus, a ROT change is not in any way bad for Siege, as many other changes would be. Population boost doesn't necessarily equal being good for Siege if what was changed to get that population boost is bad for Siege. But a ROT change is something we can change that will not hurt Siege in any way, and probably the something that will boost our population more than any other change.These are the responses that I love.
Like I said, I dont mind saying my idea was stupid. I was just a casual Sieger who had a question/idea...maybe a dumb one.
I still think you are wrong in your thought that Siege is Superior. It may seem superior to you. But like I have said. It has many flaws too. I think all the Shards have a purpose, and I have a main on all of them...
If you guys fix ROT and maybe allow more characters. Like 1 more? It might become the best. Put it this way. Siege is like that H.S. athlete with the most potential. It doesnt make you the best. Just the shard with the most potential to be the best.
Another thing that would help ROT is if the idea of Alacrity Scrolls dropping on Illshenar spawns happened as it would make ROT alot easier.
and it would keep griefing down for the spawn as the spawn just eats reds in normal gear.
QFT
The irony about Siege is that most people who WANTED to be there seem to have left because of too much neglect (broken systems, code bleed from regular shards making existing systems less and less viable, etc.) for too long.
-Skylark
reports of my demise have been greatly exagerated. im still in the jsv alliance on one of my accounts, however ive decided to go back to my roots.i have been an emmisary for years and across several shards for UZI so i brought it to life on siege. As of now i dont have alot of time to devote to bringing up a new chapter but in time it will flourish and as everywhere UZI exists we will dominate factions. You my brother are always welcome within our ranks.Sup Jeremiah...thought u left...
This is the same Limlight that was in UZI with you.
:-]
Spree: Your rudeness and "funny" comments are not needed. You dont need to post in my thread and are free to ignore me and my posts. Please do.
Not Superior, different. Yes all the shards have a purpose. For me Siege's purpose is to be challenging.I still think you are wrong in your thought that Siege is Superior. It may seem superior to you. But like I have said. It has many flaws too. I think all the Shards have a purpose, and I have a main on all of them...
You say that you respect shards for being different and unique. Yet, you try to change Siege to make it more like a trammel shard? Where is the respect you claim?I respect all shards for what they are. Different and Unique. Yet, some of you have this "better then everyone else" arrogance.
Havent harvested bones in awhile.Yes, I harvest bones off shadow wisps. Without either magery or a weapon skill as such.
I made myself a suit out of Heartwood, each piece has +5% hci, I use a katana that has +9 hci, a siege blessed + swords dread pirate hat (leaving my now unblessed tome at home) and a pair of + swords jewels.
With this suit on I can no longer gate of course, so it's a 2 minute dash from my home to Minoc moongate first - usually pass up to 5 dark wisps to do that
in closing..............................*claps*So everyone agrees to Negate Limlight on the recall/ SJ additions (if they did that they should add everything of ingame content to SP, including Telekinesis)
ROT needs to be updated to reflect the addition of +20 skill points and adjust gain timers and skill per day allowable (Thats It, end of discussion)
Aside from none of this to ever be completed, if anyone of us (you called arrogant people came back to ATL We would whoop your best hands down)
with that 'UBER' blessed suits yous got our templates would just rock yous that much harder Nooblight
Well..............So everyone agrees to Negate Limlight on the recall/ SJ additions (if they did that they should add everything of ingame content to SP, including Telekinesis)
ROT needs to be updated to reflect the addition of +20 skill points and adjust gain timers and skill per day allowable (Thats It, end of discussion)
Aside from none of this to ever be completed, if anyone of us (you called arrogant people came back to ATL We would whoop your best hands down)
with that 'UBER' blessed suits yous got our templates would just rock yous that much harder Nooblight
1. Vortex, you obviously dont read. I said I have no problem with saying my idea sucks. Its the "trammel is that way" and "go back to your easy shard" that is annoying. How did I dis-respect your shard?
Making a suggestion is dis-respect? *shrugs*
No sir, calling us arrogant was disrepectful. Generalizing those of us who play on Siege is disrespectful.
Those comments were made by certain people, not the shard as a whole. And while I don't condone what they say, I'm sure they said it because you got your answer and continued to argue - even when the reasons were clearly pointed out to you.
Giving a thought - great.
Asking for an opinion - even better.
Having a discussion about it - awesome.
ARGUING a point that is long dead - waste of time. People get fed up when you waste their time and some people strike out with comments such as you mentioned.
However, to condemn a shard as "arrogant" due to 2 comments? - Ignorance.
Is it safe to say this thread is ...so what i gotta do to get it locked?Here limlight for your great ideas:Well..............So everyone agrees to Negate Limlight on the recall/ SJ additions (if they did that they should add everything of ingame content to SP, including Telekinesis)
ROT needs to be updated to reflect the addition of +20 skill points and adjust gain timers and skill per day allowable (Thats It, end of discussion)
Aside from none of this to ever be completed, if anyone of us (you called arrogant people came back to ATL We would whoop your best hands down)
with that 'UBER' blessed suits yous got our templates would just rock yous that much harder Nooblight
More then 1 person said they would be open to doing something with it. So obviously "everyone" doesnt apply here.
Since you obviously dont read:
KAT, Shakaja, Skylark...were all not completely opposed...but Skylarks opinion was that they could add gate spells similiar to gate for Necros, Pallly. Which did what I wanted...created a discussion.
I already explained how telekinesis is different as it negates a completely different skill - Remove Trap. Which Recall doesnt as its used by the same skill set as Gate. So they are completely different animals.
Yes, ROT needs a fix.
In closing.......you just made the best run-on sentence I have seen here for awhile. Congrats. You have yet another third account Nico/Chard?
lol
Whiskey.Your.Grammar.Is.Fail.
Because were making fun of you ..havent you figured that out yet?1. Cant see your attached picture.
2. Why are you responding to yet "another person" I was talking too?
lol...looks like you need 3 Stratics accounts to argue a point.
You need to learn how to better juggle 3 monikers, as you seem to be really bad at this. Or just really bad when flustered.
3. Vortex - good point. I may have been harsh in labeling the "whole" shard as arrogant.
Let me re-phrase. Siege has SOME players that are the most arrogant players of any shard.
Also, the topic was hardly dead as Skylark pointed out some good ideas. Adding a gate spell to Chivalry and Necromancy.
4. Lastly, if the topic is a dead horse, then posting it only bumps it up. If it was a complete annoyance...why are their over 600+ views... and 89 posts.
Obviously people chose to go into the dead horse thread.
Which is believe it or not...a conversation topic.
I wouldn't say that. Most of the people who have said what you just said, that "ROT needs updated to reflect the addition of +20 skill points," are the ones asking for a minor change, a little "tweak" to ROT. That will not do. And even if we all maxed out at gm, ROT would still need a change. It takes 3 months for a power gamer to finish a 7xgm char...which is still way too long. 6x120 is 4.5 months but even if there was no such thing as a 120 skilled character, that wouldn't change the fact that ROT needs a major change.ROT needs to be updated to reflect the addition of +20 skill points and adjust gain timers and skill per day allowable (Thats It, end of discussion)
lol...your posting style is identical to Chard and Nico. Arguing with one person using 3 monikers isWill dimkite dont let us so-called most arrogent players of siege get you down
i might just have to post about how immature lame no skill noobs ATL players are in their forums and expect milk, cookies, flowers and teddybears left for responses ..
keep it going ........
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................lol...your posting style is identical to Chard and Nico. Arguing with one person using 3 monikers isWill dimkite dont let us so-called most arrogent players of siege get you down
i might just have to post about how immature lame no skill noobs ATL players are in their forums and expect milk, cookies, flowers and teddybears left for responses ..
keep it going ........
Go ahead and post in the ATL forums. Your opinion wont mean squat.lol.
I have already recieved 7 PM's telling me to "ignore that idiot".
You dont have me down. Quite the contrary, you have me laughing. Because anyone this bad at arguing behind 3 different monikers is truly pathetic.
Its not hard to see, you walked into the first one and then admitted it. Then you let your stupid grammar and posting styles carry over into each moniker.
Your like some little kid who starts a thread and basically has a conversation with himself.
Only one making fun of me is you. Everyone else ripped the idea or just said HEAVENS NO.
Yet, once again you include yourself with everyone else in a topic.
It seems my statement was definetly wrong.
Siege only has one arrogant idiot. Unfortunetly, he hides behind several different monikers...so we have no idea which personality we are arguing with at that moment.
Do u ramble like this all the time?lol...your posting style is identical to Chard and Nico. Arguing with one person using 3 monikers isWill dimkite dont let us so-called most arrogent players of siege get you down
i might just have to post about how immature lame no skill noobs ATL players are in their forums and expect milk, cookies, flowers and teddybears left for responses ..
keep it going ........
Go ahead and post in the ATL forums. Your opinion wont mean squat.lol.
I have already recieved 7 PM's telling me to "ignore that idiot".
You dont have me down. Quite the contrary, you have me laughing. Because anyone this bad at arguing behind 3 different monikers is truly pathetic.
Its not hard to see, you walked into the first one and then admitted it. Then you let your stupid grammar and posting styles carry over into each moniker.
Your like some little kid who starts a thread and basically has a conversation with himself.
Only one making fun of me is you. Everyone else ripped the idea or just said HEAVENS NO.
Yet, once again you include yourself with everyone else in a topic.
It seems my statement was definetly wrong.
Siege only has one arrogant idiot. Unfortunetly, he hides behind several different monikers...so we have no idea which personality we are arguing with at that moment.
You seem speechless alot.............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..................................
Do u ramble like this all the time?
Your confusing me with these big words...Do u ramble like this all the time?
It would appear your forgot to log-out and back in to one of your other monikers. As you quoted the exact same topic and made another worthless/mindless response.
Ramble: To turn aside, especially from the main subject in writing or speaking
Everything said was on topic and was a response to mindless things said by you. Therefore, not rambling. But maybe if you were to learn the definition of words, you could properly apply them.
Double posting with nothing to say always shows your brain "power".
Your confusion is derived from birth. Not from words.Your confusing me with these big words...