<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
Take your head outta your butt for a second here, I don't see anyone's ebolt missing, or their flamestrike misssing, are any of their spells missing for the matter. But how many times does a weapon swoosh when swinging at a mage? A mage teleports on top of a building, and mega dumps on a warrior, but a warrior has to be right on top of the mage, then prey he don't get the "swoosh" affect.
*rolls eyes* Please, spare me with your bull****.
[/ QUOTE ]
Take your kryss out of your butt for a second here, because I don't see any dexxer swings being interrupted either pal.
The standard field mage is not overpowered. If it were, EVERYBODY would [censored] run one, but what do we see? Stealth archers and tamers. Even many of the most experienced and dedicated mages on this shard have made the switch (or have quit).
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree, that at the present moment, mages aren't nearly as bad as they have been for the past 10 years, they certainly don't hold a candle to the ridiculous archers that are out there. So yes, atm tamers and archers are a lot worse than mages, but I m,ean c'mon, it's been a helluva run for mages, has it not? And mages have had the upper hand for 10 years, so I'm not sad for mages not being the currently powerhouse template, but warriors have always been considered "gimps" to the developers. Hell, they even have to travel by foot. LOL