Curious as to why some people dislike them so much.
1. They don't affect your gameplay
2. There is a large playerbase who does appreciate them (casual & hardcore gamers)
3. Online games in which items that can be traded easily create jobs for people whether you like it or not
4. If EA wanted to discourage the selling of items, they would just set up a system like WOW in which high end items must be earned and cannot be bought
Knowing these 4 facts, I am just wondering if there are any legitimate reasons to dislike certain people, other than them being rude?
**Keep in mind I am NOT talking about dupers, just gold sellers in general**
"**Keep in mind I am NOT talking about dupers, just gold sellers in general**"
But you WERE talking about a duper when you posted that screenshot of a well-known UO dupers house turned to rubble on Great Lakes after the duped vine cord sandals got nuked.
How does a squeaky clean gold seller/broker such as yourself know where a duper lives?
1. Gold sellers affect my gameplay because I can't give away items for free to help people (and I have lots of items from idocing).
I wouldn't like to support cheating in UO, and my free item being put up on someone's website for sale for $3.50 (threefitty!) would be supporting cheating. (Scripters/dupers supply these websites and the gold sellers/brokers).
2. UO has a large playerbase?
I understand that PvPers hate to pvm (my son refuses to pvm) so they'd prefer to pay cash for their insurance money and PvP gear.
And since their Mommy's told them that they are Special why should they give a **** if they are supporting cheating so long as they get to do what they want to do in UO?
Just because there's a "large" number of these type players in UO doesn't make it ok.
3. True enough. What I don't like is the fact the EA?/Mythic doesn't care enough about their property to stop people like you from exploiting it.
Blizzard, on the other hand, does backflips to stop gold sellers and their support staff, dupers and scripters, and has 10 million subs to prove that that is what people want in their online game.
Compare to EA's love of gold sellers and UO subs.
4. I have come to the conclusion that EA/Mythic is a "niche" online gaming company.
They think small therefore their online game offerings will always be niche-style games with small subscription numbers.
I say this because UO:KR had a tightly closed beta with maybe 100 testers (read dev asskissers here, or yes men), then they added maybe 100 more who weren't invited to the private beta forums so were not even allowed to voice their opinions of KR.
KR was then released and nonbeta testers were appalled at how awful it was, thanks to EA/Mythic's thinking small and using a "niche=style" form of beta testing!
They didn't learn from this fiasco, no, they repeated it again with Warhammer, and surprise their tiny little "niche-style" beta testing gave them erroneous data and a new "niche-style" game, Warhammer.
WoW has official forums which allows Blizzard lots of control over what's said in public about WoW.
It seems that whenever WoW goes down every Tuesday for maintenance, usually for 8 long hours, Blizzard also takes down the forums so no one can go spend those 8 hours of downtime pancakes about the game on the forums.
Compare this type of forward thinking to EA's treatment of Warhammer.
Warhammer didn't rate official forums so now Mark Jacobs, Mythic/Warhammer and UO's boss man is all over the web begging for advice on how to make Warhammer as good as WoW.
Do I think EA/Mythic will do anything like Blizzard does?
No, because they never heard the phrase: "It takes money to make money".
Edit: Oh and as far as I know it's not illegal to be rude to gold sellers ingame.
