^^ change bored "fringe" pvpers to bored "crap" pvpers... the ones that cant win in Fel so they go to trammel and disrupt things.
That may be the case for some players, but I would venture for every such "player" you label as such, there's just as many who grief, hog spawns, are antisocial, etc... who never actually set foot in Fel.
As for "crap" PvP'ers, possibly. Most of the better PvP'ers left UO to look at other games, when AoS was introduced and completely changed the mechanics of the game.
There are still a few genuinely good PvP'ers around though. I've played with and against some of these in factions on Great Lakes. They're a dying breed though.
btw I support enhancements to Siege, the creation of a PvP only super shard with insurance (Siege with insurance), creation of PvP Arenas.
I understand that in the context of the item-driven game UO has become. But why not also have the pre-AoS "classic" option which is more about character and player skill, than items then? It's likely to draw more players than "another" AoS item based option.
Siege is already an alternative option. What you're suggesting, "Siege with insurance" could easily be implemented, on Siege. I think that would split what's left of the Siege community though. Essentially though, you already have that option on all the production shards, in Fel. So really, you're not offering a worthwhile alternative.
I dont respect the opinions of a small minority, judas's who sold out and make a living off UO and "griefers" that ruin the game for the majority.
So here you go again. You cast aspersions. Might as well put it in your signature, to save you typing it repeatedly. It's getting like a stuck record now and honestly, quite laughable. Do you realise what a fool you're making yourself look like?
I'm a regular player, just like anyone else. Every time someone disagrees with something you say, or the wild statements you make, they're instantly accused of being a broker or gold farmer or some such, a cheater, or that they were/are a griefer. As if that's supposed to give your arguments some ground to rest on.
Well, shoot enough bullets, you might hit one or two random targets. The rest of us are what we are... regular players, like everyone else, who would like an alternative option. That option being the same concept of Ultima Online we signed up to all those years ago.
Oh, before you head off on the PvP tangent again, it isn't
just about PvP, just as Siege isn't
just about PvP. It's about overall gameplay, challenges, adventure, community and freedoms in a virtual world, that just aren't the same now.
So, you're free to not respect whoever you like. Do you honestly think people respect the drivel and baseless accusations you're so readily willing to type?
