UO - additional advertising needed for this game

[Black Sun]

haha Get real.

Would the overwhelming majority rather pay $13/month to play -

(a) Real game image of Dungeon Keeper OL using same engine as NetDragon UO 3D


or this
(b)

I'll take game B every time. Graphics are not everything. Not to mention the fact that most modern MMO's (in my opinion) look like fuzzy cartoon crap.

 

[Cirno]

Can you point us to where they said the Dungeon Keeper game is based on the UO 3D engine?

If you look at other games they have, then you'll notice that they're all kind of the same.
So it's a fair assumption that they use the same base engine across games, kind of like Bioware (Aurora, although I think Bioware recreated Aurora based on the UT3 engine for Mass Effect, and each iteration has s different name) or Valve (Source).
So similarly it would be fair to assume that they will share an engine.

But, as I've said, there isn't any news, so it's all speculation.

 

[Viper09]

haha Get real.

Would the overwhelming majority rather pay $13/month to play -

(a) Real game image of Dungeon Keeper OL using same engine as NetDragon UO 3D


or this
(b)

Really? That's your argument?

Why not just put ANY modern game under A and compare it to B (UO)??? Of course A will look better! Doesn't mean jack though, UO will still be here.

 

[Valerin]

haha Get real.

Would the overwhelming majority rather pay $13/month to play -

(a) Real game image of Dungeon Keeper OL using same engine as NetDragon UO 3D

or this
(b)

This game is proof that players don't care about graphics if the gameplay is good:

 

[Black Sun]

This game is proof that players don't care about graphics if the gameplay is good:

Very good (and very valid too!) point.