Are you on crack? Bot Talk ...
You definitely make a good republican though
...More Bot Talk...
SOMEONE (caps just for you) should take a class...
...
Bunch of Self proclaiming BS that is not and can not be substantiated for the sole purpose of programming the Bot with sound bites
Well, ok you are clearly on the Ropes and the buttons are very effective. Your in the incoherent phase of Bot Talk that is characterized by the following Bot Speak,
"You on Crack"
"You need your meds"
"You ... just insert personal attacks of a nature that the poster can under no circumstance possibly know anything about"
You need to understand your shouting at the top of your lungs at just how insecure you are of your knowledge (aka YOUR BLUFFING).
You are thinking that to direct personal attacks at me, will some how improve YOUR BLUFF.
Get a clue, all your doing is making it clear your cards have NO VALUE
Poor thing, didn't like the Bubble being burst on his/her PBS/NPR. I can relate to that, to get exposed to the fact that your being programmed and you would have sworn you were NOT BEING PROGRAMMED. That your precious little PBS/NPR are BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY EXTREMIST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, HIDDEN BY THE LIES AND DECEPTIONS OF DONATIONS.
Poor thing, YOU were forced to face the ... what ever ... of believing that because an entity declares itself to be NOT FOR PROFIT that, that declaration DOES NOT MEAN ANYTHING OTHER THAN IT WILL SPEND ALL OF ITS INCOME. That its income IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE EXCLUSIVELY DONATIONS.
To be forced to understand that I can open a NOT FOR PROFIT CHARITY, whose charter is to help abandoned kittens in Timbuktu. THAT ALL THAT IS REQUIRED OF ME, IS TO SPEND AT LEAST 10% OF THE INCOME DOING EXACTLY THAT. THE OTHER 90% CAN BE PAID OUT AS ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES, EXPENSES WHAT EVER I WANT TO DO WITH IT (PROSTITUTES, DRUGS, ALCOHOL, PORN). I DO NOT NEED TO ACCOUNT TO ANYONE HOW I SPEND THAT 90%.
It is a free and anonymous Internet, feel free to come at me like the Junk Yard Dog. BUT DO NOT BLAME ME WHEN YOU FIND OUT JUST HOW TOOTHLESS YOU ARE.
You clearly believe what you read (DO NOT even pretend otherwise after that .... rolleyes: ... BS Link).
Against my better judgement, I am going to help you deprogram yourself.
"It is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation" (NOTE: your posted words NOT MINE)
What do you know about foundations? ANYTHING AT ALL? Foundations and Funds are identical.
They have one or more people administering the MONEY (BIG CLUE HERE) of the Fund to achieve the Goals (WHICH THEY CAN REWRITE AS OFTEN AS THEY WANT TO, (ANOTHER BIG CLUE HERE) AND THAT GOAL IS NOT LEGALLY REQUIRED TO EXIST (ANOTHER BIG CLUE HERE) AND THE PUBLICLY STATED GOAL IS 100% RAH RAH, SALES LITERATURE, PABLUM FOR THE BOTS TO EAT (ANOTHER BIG CLUE HERE)) of the Fund.
IN YOUR STATED CASE, APPOINTMENTS ARE MADE (BIG CLUE HERE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE FUND, IN THE CASE OF A PROFESSOR, IT CAN BE TO FUND A CHAIR POSITION FOR THEM AND/OR TO FUND ANY NUMBER OF PET PROJECTS FOR THEM) to fulfill the GOALS OF THE FUND (BIG CLUE HERE THAT DOES NOT NEED TO BE PUBLICLY STATED AND CAN BE IN CONTRADICTION TO WHAT IS PUBLICLY STATED). These APPOINTMENTS ARE SELECTED (BIG CLUE HERE AS IN LETS HIRE 100% EXTREMIST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS) by the people administering the fund (BIG CLUE HERE THEY APPOINT PEOPLE THAT THINK WHAT THEY WANT THEM TO THINK).
YOU seem to think there is some Legislation/Law that is going to mandate honesty, openness, fairness, Truth, Justice and the American WAY. BIG CLUE HERE, THERE IS NO SUCH LEGISLATION / LAW.
ANOTHER BIG CLUE FOR YOU
All of the big companies run "Scientific Studies" the same way as I outlined above.
Phiser is the BIGGEST user of the above tactic.
Right there with them are the Cigarette / Alcohol companies. ANOTHER BIG CLUE HERE, that applies to PRO their own products and ANTI their competitors products. IN SHORT THEY BUY THE ANSWER THEY WANT TO PUBLISH. THEY BUY THE PEOPLE TO STAND THERE AND SUPPORT THAT BOUGHT ANSWER THEY PUBLISHED.