Pub 78 and Siege

[Rothen]

Was reading up on the upcoming publish that just went to Test. Looks like Despise is getting revamped, but on Trammel only. How will that play out here? There are a few other nice changes, but we need the updated dungeon too...

 

[Revvo]

Was reading up on the upcoming publish that just went to Test. Looks like Despise is getting revamped, but on Trammel only. How will that play out here? There are a few other nice changes, but we need the updated dungeon too...

I started a thread in the Ask A Dev forum about this just now trying to find an answer, the thread was awaiting moderation before being posted and has now vanished will have to wait and see if it re-appears at some point

 

[Sprago]

i also asked the question but no dev response

 

[DJAd]

"s***, we forgot about that"

 

[Sprago]

they gave a response about this on twitter petra found it and they dont plan on the despise revamp for siege so again we are being over looked. i dont know about the rest of you but this is ******** we pay to play our game just like the prodoshards do we deserve better then this

 

[Petra Fyde]

I think it's more that 1. the design of training up pets to fight the Lord will not work in a pvp environment and 2. There's no where to put it on Siege without taking out the champ spawn.

 

[Sprago]

i get that but they should have thought about it when they designed it. The way they did it left siege out , why we deserve better.

 

[Alcor]

Whilst I am usually one of the first to complain when Siege misses out like this, IF they really are seriously looking at ways to help the shard (re-enabling ACTs, some sort of second house possibility) then I would not be too upset.

 

[chise2]

Whilst I am usually one of the first to complain when Siege misses out like this, IF they really are seriously looking at ways to help the shard (re-enabling ACTs, some sort of second house possibility) then I would not be too upset.

Yeah I agree with this. Not getting the despise revamp sucks but yes IF we get some help for the shard like the ACT thing and house thing Mesanna has brought up I think that will more then make up for it imo. Of course it is a big IF at this point but I am still crossing my fingers that Mesanna was serious about helping us.

 

[Sprago]

they are over looking us again and just becasue they supposedly are looking into things we are ok with this hmmm not good enough for me they need to do something not just look into it especially if they are gonna skip us on the revamp.

think about it even if they do give us those ACT's they dont have it in this publish so realistically we arent gonna see it for another couple months. im mean seriously they left us outta this publish so ya know they arent gonna make a special patch just for us, they couldnt even make this publish to include us. its not like im asking for something special i just want the same content the rest of the shards get. that shouldnt be an issue we should just automatically get same. Its not like they forgot they just left us out.

 

[Slickjack]

Sorry... wtf is "ACT'S"??

It's been awhile but all I could think was ACT's in high school, you know, the test?

Gosh I hope we don't have a test.....

 

[chise2]

Sorry... wtf is "ACT'S"??

It's been awhile but all I could think was ACT's in high school, you know, the test?

Gosh I hope we don't have a test.....

it stands for advanced character tokens. Mesanna also has asked us recently if we want those activated.

 

[Montie1123]

In truth i dont know why SP does not have a tram side with fel rule set like Mugen does. In less im wrong on that. That would have made this whole thing mute at that point lol. Yea its more land to get lost in, but as long as the rule set is the same and it just looks like the production shards tram, it would have worked.

 

[chise2]

In truth i dont know why SP does not have a tram side with fel rule set like Mugen does. In less im wrong on that. That would have made this whole thing mute at that point lol. Yea its more land to get lost in, but as long as the rule set is the same and it just looks like the production shards tram, it would have worked.

Yeah maybe in the past when Siege had ALOT more people. Now it would just make the shard seem even more dead

 

[Montie1123]

yea thats the only thing, it should have been added back when that shard first went active, now it would be nice, but its just more land to get lost in. Though it means more room for house's lol