EMs won't spawn mobs for players, its against the "rules."
Dats not troo. (contact the EM, at least on Baja Crys is happy to help out. She has spawned mobs of goblins in Governor held towns)EMs won't spawn mobs for players, its against the "rules."
yes a few em mobs would definitely make an event easier. i was thinking months back about how to do it with yellow crystals and taming/releasing mobs but didnt realize this was an option.@Smoot In my experience if you try to organize an player event far enough out, the EMs will help but i believe they have to get @Mesanna 's approval. However this not always the case. For the Fel House drop events I have run, ive requested an EM to spawn healers. When requested appropriately they had no problem with this. When not requested appropriately prepare to get trolled.
Good luck buddy, glad to see a player taking initiative and making a player event.
It was not a personal event, it was a player event for the city of Jhelom in which I am the governor. The event was available to the entire shard and was advertised ahead of time. There were no drops on the mobs and they were not uber level creatures. They are re-skinned and rehued mobs that already exist in game. I notified the EM's of what I was working on. This is an ongoing story and was approved by the EM's prior to advertising it. They cannot just spawn mobs for random things and they cannot include drops. This is also up to the EMa due to the fact that it is on their time, as it is a city event and not an EM event.Pretty sure its not against any rules
http://uo2.stratics.com/posts/49526
https://stratics.com/community/thre...ion-ii-january-29th-at-8pm-est-jhelom.332073/
Im just wondering what the standard procedure is to get this type of thing done. Do you have to just be freinds with the EM or can anyone apply to host an event?
it would be a good thing for each shards EM to sticky the procedure so interested players can take advantage of using EM mobs for our events. I dont want anything complicated, just a bunch of crimson dragons and maybe a few lower level spawn.
by personal event i just meant player event. Thanks for all the help so far, again i think each EM should sticky what is needed so anyone can do it. I'm assuming i dont actually need to be a governor, but if so suppose i can just win some town again.It was not a personal event, it was a player event for the city of Jhelom in which I am the governor. The event was available to the entire shard and was advertised ahead of time. There were no drops on the mobs and they were not uber level creatures. They are re-skinned and rehued mobs that already exist in game. I notified the EM's of what I was working on. This is an ongoing story and was approved by the EM's prior to advertising it. They cannot just spawn mobs for random things and they cannot include drops. This is also up to the EMa due to the fact that it is on their time, as it is a city event and not an EM event.
You will have a better chance if you make it an advertised event open to the entire shard. As Vic pointed out, you should email them a minimum of one month in advance. The more time you give them, the better of a chance you will have. You need to clearly state why you are doing it and what you are hoping for them to do. Let them know that it is open to the entire shard and that you understand that there will be no special drops. D&D are great to work with so hopefully the EM's will be the same on your shard.by personal event i just meant player event. Thanks for all the help so far, again i think each EM should sticky what is needed so anyone can do it. I'm assuming i dont actually need to be a governor, but if so suppose i can just win some town again.
The UO website says nothing about not assisting in player events. http://uo.com/Game-EventsI am shocked, SHOCKED I SAY, that the "rules" are applied based on individual EM whims.
/sarcasm
@Mesanna @Kyronix
IMHO, this is one of the major problems with the EM system: the inexplicably inconsistent application of "rules" from one shard to another.
Despite RP plotlines, GL has continually been told "No" to requests for the spawning of anything and no to decoration requests, unless they are extremely temporary. Yet we've seen requests for these things granted on other shards. We were told these were Mesanna's edicts.
You either allow things equally across all shards, or you'd better expect to hear legitimate cries of favoritism.
Don't most EMs hold Halls of Commons or Meet and Greets or some kind of OOC meeting with players? Those are good sources of information. Could have sworn I saw you at a Chesapeake Hall of Commons not terribly long ago.by personal event i just meant player event. Thanks for all the help so far, again i think each EM should sticky what is needed so anyone can do it. I'm assuming i dont actually need to be a governor, but if so suppose i can just win some town again.
apparently you were right. I spoke with a few EMs on shards where i might like to hold an event, and they told me basically the same thing. Now im honestly kinda frustrated that either this rule is only applied on a case by case basis, Or special treatment is given to specific cases, Or EMs are just ignoring the rules made by @Mesanna .EMs won't spawn mobs for players, its against the "rules."
2) Obviously showing favoritism at the last event when it was a stealing event. Only a select few got all the drops. They entertained the crowd for 2 hours while those select few went and stole all the items.
It's the fact that Chessy is consistent with this type of stuff. An EM is there to support the shard they were assigned to - to make the players there happy. I will admit that i'm not a native to chessy, I have played there but I am not a native. However, I've heard from people who play that shard that they are disappointed by the many aspects listed already. D&D have great story fiction, they do. It's the fact that their flaws stand out and they take no action to prevent it to happen again. I mean, if the EM on my shard lied to me, than I would be pretty pissed.I don't know about #1 because I was not there for events at that time, and I do not know about #3 because I do not play Atlantic, but as far as the Chessy event, no one was told any secrets in advance. Everyone who was there was given the same information.People were out all night and early morning following the event getting the items. Some choose to listen while others do not. I do not know you, do know if you were there, and I did not get any drops. General chat was full of people talking about it as was the EM channel long after the event was over. D&D are always getting bitched at, not enough drops, events are too long, too much talking, events are weak, and I am tired of hearing it. Events are not mandatory, people are free to come and go as they please, if you leave early you might miss out. It is as simple as that.
Chessy has been helping player events for years so if it were not allowed, I am sure that they would have been replaced. I am sure that more active shards like Atlantic don't want to start working with player events due to the size of the shard. I am sure if they did it on Atlantic then it would become a full time job.
Show me somewhere official that it is not allowed. It does not say that on UO.com anywhere that I can find. This so called rule only seems to be told by EM's not spawning things. Maybe they are the ones being untruthful, or maybe, since it is on their time and not an official UO story ARC or EM Event, maybe it is their choice on whether to do it or not.
When Kyronix was known as EM Dudley on Chessy, he also assisted in player run events. I guess that he was punished for this direct act of defiance by being promoted to a developer.
There's no rules anymore. Everyone does and says what ever they want.EMs won't spawn mobs for players, its against the "rules."
Anarchy? So... nothings changed then...There's no rules anymore. Everyone does and says what ever they want.
I agree with this 100% and I do feel sorry for the shards that do not have the EM support that we do. I know Chessy has been doing it since I moved to there in 2009. I believe that the EMs on LA did the same thing back in 2007 but that was long time ago and I cannot say that for sure. EMs are around to help bring the community together and I think D&D do a great job. I appreciate everything that they do.You see where I'm getting at? There are two sides. One side says it is perfectly fine for EM's to help player events by locking down items and spawning bosses, while the other side says it is against the rules for being an Event Moderator.
I love how you have all decided that this was dishonesty on the Chesapeake EMs' part and not a miscommunication or mistake. Mesanna herself has said she gets something like 300+ emails per day. I'm sure even EM emails slip through the cracks sometimes. Your bias is showing.1) Lying to their own players regarding those even swords. Told the players that is was an accident and it was a mistake when in reality, they requested the swords to be unequipped. Thus, making more work on Mesanna.
I'm tired of seeing this repeated, as it is completely false. First off, no one had any more information than anyone else. If you weren't paying attention, you didn't get the clues that there was possibly more to be done. If you took off after the combat part was over, that's on you. If you weren't paying attention to what the EMs were saying (and the hints were pretty heavy by the end), then that's on you.2) Obviously showing favoritism at the last event when it was a stealing event. Only a select few got all the drops. They entertained the crowd for 2 hours while those select few went and stole all the items.
And I love how once again, you've all decided that the Chesapeake EMs are in the wrong... even though the Chesapeake EMs aren't the only ones who do this. Yet they are the only ones that get complained about constantly. It's almost as if this entire post was really yet another passive aggressive axe grind about them...3) Now spawning event mobs at Player events when EM's are clearly told not to do such a thing.
The event types listed are either game wide fiction arcs or events the EMs run themselves. Nowhere on that page does it say EMs can spawn things or lock down deco for player events. In fact, the page avoids the topic of player-run events, and any potential EM involvement therein, completely."Now spawning event mobs at Player events when EM's are clearly told not to do such a thing." First, it's been stated above how exactly this is not correct. It actually is stated pretty clearly at http://uo.com/Game-Events that EMs can indeed do this.
It appears to be "okay" if the EMs take their own initiative to spawn stuff during a player event either as a just for fun thing, or to further the EM's on ongoing plotlines. (The EMs on GL spawned executioners at High Council meetings during the end of Casca's reign. The HC didn't ask for it, but they had openly opposed Casca regime and it fit in with the EM's story.)I've seen EM Falcon taking part at Red Cow auctions quite frequently, along with body-type changes (and occasionally spawn). Screenshots from just one such appearance: View attachment 28730 View attachment 28731 View attachment 28732 View attachment 28733
I've personally seen the EMs on Europa, Pacific, Formosa, Catskills, Asuka, Wakoku, Izumo, Arirang, and others which perhaps I'm forgetting, also doing such minor spawn/deco to help add to player events.
No one is disputing this, the problem is that people are blaming D&D. Chessy and other shards have been doing this for years. EM Dudley (Kyronix) did it on Chessy as well before being promoted to a developer. If helping player events was not allowed, then he and the current Chessy EMs would have been dismissed long ago.Every shard has to have the exact same rules, no exceptions.
It wasn't a deciphering frenzy. As I said, the hints got pretty heavy by the end. I wish I had a transcript, but I don't. I'm going to have to figure out how to log chat I guess.I admit that I have faults in my argument, those I will attest to.
My one and only actual complaint was the sheer fact that for over 5 years I have been turned down for EM help regarding a very well detailed story fiction event have hosted. I was told that it was against the rules of an EM to do any of these. I left it at that.
I admit, maybe I am wrong regarding the other issues, and if I am wrong, there is still truth in the matter.
@Riyana when I go to events, I give my full undivided attention to the story. I love story fiction. That is what is keeping me to this game are the events. So when I go to events, in which case I do go to a lot of them, I do pay attention to the storyline. My complaint regarding the stealing items was that it was vaguely hinted at. I'll admit, I'm good at giving out riddles, but I'm horrible at solving them. I feel that if you have to do a full on deciphering frenzy, then it just isn't as fun. Yes, it is fun to do a little code breaking here and there, but at the level at that event?
Chesapeake is a FREQUENT target for excessive and often unfounded complaints. It's not always explicitly stated that complaints are about Chesapeake, but it's pretty obvious. It's getting really old.I feel the reason why Chesapeake is being targeted right now is because it is the most recent.
Perhaps this is true on Atlantic... with the population size I imagine it would be almost impossible for the EM(s) to keep up with demand. Great Lakes as well probably. Maybe we need a couple of extra EMs or floater EMs to help out instead of tearing down EMs who are engaging with their shards' communities.Like I said, I was told by MANY EM's that is against the rules, given to them by Mesanna herself, for EM's to participate in player events in the aspect of creating monsters for them and locking down items. I've been told this by my Atlantic EM as well, for years and years.
It's been so bad on Chesapeake that whole events have had to stop and restart partway through. Many Chesapeake players have had way more than enough.I see where you are coming from regarding the 'x-sharders' that always cause a problem at events when they spew out phrases such as "give me the drop already,".. I am sorry for their actions. However, because of a few bad eggs, xsharders have been labeled as such.
Yet many of the complaints are about length of the RP taking place...When in reality, most xsharders go for the enjoyment of the RP style.
On that much we agree!Which Is why I believe EM's or Advisors should be able to squelch a player if needed. Ie: they are disrupting a player or EM event with their nonsense.
if you are really interested email mesanna and nails about the situation with the pirate swords.Alex and Smoot, I'm sorry, but you guys are simply out of line.
Simply put, the Chessie EMs have not lied to players.
its not just the high pop shards. my first choice was catskills, which actually has a lower population than Chesapeake.The fact is that it seems to be the EMs on higher populated shards that are ones saying that it is not allowed though there is no mention anywhere official by UO/Broadsword.
in general, if an EM holds an event, tells everyone its over and that theres only RP left, and then gives out items afterward its easily mistaken for corruption whether that was the EM's intention or not. There have been so many cases of "oops i forgot to lock this down" said by an EM and then the items showing up in the hands of players that running an event like this just doesnt put a good image in the minds of the majority of UOers.And no, no one was told to leave--we were told, when someone asked the inevitable "is it over"--that the combat part was over and that there was more RP. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. The clues were in the RP. Pay attention.
The fact that so many people interpreted "no more combat" as "nothing more to see here" is very telling. No one knew it was a "stealing event"--which really, it wasn't. The stealing all took place afterward.
in general, if an EM holds an event, tells everyone its over and that theres only RP left, and then gives out items afterward its easily mistaken for corruption whether that was the EM's intention or not. There have been so many cases of "oops i forgot to lock this down" said by an EM and then the items showing up in the hands of players that running an event like this just doesnt put a good image in the minds of the majority of UOers.
I only ask the EMs, THINK before you decide how to run / announce an event. Because on the internet appearance is everything.
I don't know what happened at the Chessy event that's being crosstalked about, I don't really care who did or didn't say what. I'm not interested in singling out specific EMs for a public egging. Unless many EMs are just outright lying, there must be some sort of rules floating around, though I'm willing to bet Mesanna doesn't enforce them evenly. Capricious enforcement is just as bad as no enforcement.No one is disputing this, the problem is that people are blaming D&D. Chessy and other shards have been doing this for years. EM Dudley (Kyronix) did it on Chessy as well before being promoted to a developer. If helping player events was not allowed, then he and the current Chessy EMs would have been dismissed long ago.
Were this true, it would be from whence the cries of favoritism stem. And they'd be valid. You can't have variable standards/restrictions for EM involvement based on shard population. If an EM on one shard says yes, they ALL have to (based on the same criterion). Could the larger shards see an influx of requests? Sure. It doesn't mean they all have to be granted, but some certainly could be. This is where managing expectations becomes critical, and where Mesanna has completely lost the ball.The fact is that it seems to be the EMs on higher populated shards that are ones saying that it is not allowed though there is no mention anywhere official by UO/Broadsword. My take on that is that should they start assisting any player events, then they will be bombarded with requests due to the population of the shard.
You're now misquoting the EM saying "no more fighting" as "its over". Two very different things... and it's kind of telling that you interpreted it that way.in general, if an EM holds an event, tells everyone its over and that theres only RP left,
So leaving stealables around on the shard for people to find is favoritism? You know they announced this mechanic in several HOCs last year and said that any event, not RBG related, could very well contain stealables, or items, to be picked up so other play styles can hae a chance to have an item. In fact there were several events that afterwards we were informed (In PUBLIC CHAT) that shoot nobody found the bonus loot and it's been removed.Im not seeing these "heavy hints" anywhere. my point is, in todays game players shouldnt need a degree in UO to even know there is a stealing event. Never did i see the words theif or stealing, or anything having to do with stealing. There was all kinds of talk of the red crystal things even before the boss. Basically, the EMs didnt announce it was a stealing event, RPed for 3hours, and threw in very light references to the crystals (which could mean anything) when they knew the majority of the players (except the 6 in my poll who prefer 2hour plus events) would be weary eyed from a 3 hour long RP session. In my opinion the EMs did a very bad job at communicating, which was interpreted by many as favoritism and corruption. (especially since there have been many many times of "bending the event rules" to influence who wins before) Thats just a fact. In public relations it doesnt matter if something is actually true or not, and this instance had a very bad appearance to the whole thing.
its just not like the other shards, if you read the bulk of my thread, i think one of the biggest fallacies of the EM program is lack of consistency and non-existent standards for basic player expectations.So leaving stealables around on the shard for people to find is favoritism? You know they announced this mechanic in several HOCs last year and said that any event, not RBG related, could very well contain stealables, or items, to be picked up so other play styles can hae a chance to have an item. In fact there were several events that afterwards we were informed (In PUBLIC CHAT) that shoot nobody found the bonus loot and it's been removed.
HEY GUYS I'M GIVING YOU FAVORITISM RIGHT NOW by posting this information in a public place! To quote one of my favorite UO poets, "omg omg omg omg omg"