Can someone give me the history of PAWS and why so many want what might be in this place
Ozog of Chessy
Ozog of Chessy
A certain GL player once shoved an EM RPC's face into a bowl of mashed potatoes to get him to talk. In fact, we tend to threaten quite a few of them with bodily harm on an alarmingly regular basis in the pursuit of knowledge....shoving an RPC into a fountain may make that RPC reluctant to share information with you in the future.(lol...who would DO that!)
Close. But not quite.In UO, Paws is the four small buildings directly south of Britain along the coast.
Seer Adamantyr's work is nice and all...but it isn't UO cannon and contains details found nowhere else.Close. But not quite.
Paws isn't mentioned again until the Crisis in Britannia, day 117 audio drama of 2000.Lord Rezni had not yet heard any other news, but waited in anticipation of information from the other two outposts, one near Wrong and the other north of Vesper. The worry and concern was plain on his face, but he stood tall in his duty. Realizing that both of us would do well with a bit of food in our stomachs, I went down to the Cat’s Lair, a tavern in the southwestern portion of Britain. This tavern was once part of a village known as Paws, but Britain had expanded and attempted to claim the tavern as its own. Most of the farmers of Paws had pushed out more west and southward.
...and farmers tend to build farms. Both sources agree that the farmers were relocated into the West. That the four huts is Paws is one of those assumptions we've turned into lore over time.Most of the farmers of Paws had pushed out more west and southward.
And that's where I'm going to have to disagree with you.BNN is better cannon then that collection of docs, sorry. Ilshenar's temporal schizophrenia and Mark Steelman’s lackadaisical attention to what came before aside, most of UO Britannia's lore/history is relatively stable.
"Canon" in contexts like this one usually refers to fiction or lore that's generally accepted as coming from the manufacturer or writer. For example in Star Trek, what went on in the shows and movies is considered "canon." Certain things that fans like to imagine aren't necessarily "canon." Some extra-canon things can be quite reasonable, some maybe aren't, and surely no one questions the right of fans to let their minds wander far and wide, but that doesn't mean they are "canon" in the absolute sense.And that's where I'm going to have to disagree with you.
BNN / UO Lore is a gaggle of unresolved plots and forgotten characters. And it tells us nothing about the lore of the cities and Britannia itself.
Is Shattered Worlds canon? No idea. But it was written by someone who at the time was of higher rank than the average player. Which means it probably has a little more weight than player lore about four huts.
If by "shattered worlds" you mean the fact that the shards exist, that they were created by the Stranger's shattering of the Gem of Mondain? Then, yes, Warder, it is canon by the commonly accepted definition of that term. It is lore that came from the manufacturer and indeed such was the subject of the UO intro movie that we had for years and years and years. We've had it mentioned and discussed in-game, Lord British has referred to it in-game, it's the subject of in-game books done by the manufacturer.Is Shattered Worlds canon? No idea.
One. We're discussing Seer-penned lore. A Seer who was given the authority to create events and lore for UO.Certain things that fans like to imagine aren't necessarily "canon." Some extra-canon things can be quite reasonable, some maybe aren't, and surely no one questions the right of fans to let their minds wander far and wide, but that doesn't mean they are "canon" in the absolute sense.
Two. We're discussing whether GL's Fan Fiction - and that is what it is - about Paws being four small huts on the edge of Britain carries more weight than a Seers work. Zmuir's BNN quote doesn't mention four small huts. In fact it matches the Location in Adamtyr's piece.You, Warder, and the group of players that clusters around you, may ignore it if you wish, ...
No one is trying to strangle you and your friends with the lore, but there's a distinct difference between not following the lore and pretending it ain't there.
Ozog,Can someone give me the history of PAWS and why so many what what might be in this place
Ozog of Chessy
The way you keep changing conditions and terms is one of the many problems in responding to you, Warder.One. We're discussing Seer-penned lore. A Seer who was given the authority to create events and lore for UO.
Not fan fiction.
Two. We're discussing whether GL's Fan Fiction - and that is what it is - about Paws being four small huts on the edge of Britain carries more weight than a Seers work. Zmuir's BNN quote doesn't mention four small huts. In fact it matches the Location in Adamtyr's piece.
Let's not twist what I have said, shall we? You're attempts to suggest I don't follow the lore because I don't follow your shards unique conventions is amusing at best.
In other words not at all referencing GL fan fiction, or whatever term you used for it, as other than that status.Most shards seem to ignore this "history" in favor of the four buildings being caled Paws.
Shattered Worlds - or the Historical Background of Shattered Worlds - is the name used to refer to Seer Adamtyr's piece. You know that as well as I.GalenKnighthawke said:If by "shattered worlds" you mean the fact that the shards exist, that they were created by the Stranger's shattering of the Gem of Mondain? Then, yes, Warder, it is canon by the commonly accepted definition of that term.
[...]
You questioned her by questioning the idea of canon, even to the point of questioning the shattered worlds thing,
That so?The way you keep changing conditions and terms is one of the many problems in responding to you, Warder.
Actually, no, I didn't.Shattered Worlds - or the Historical Background of Shattered Worlds - is the name used to refer to Seer Adamtyr's piece. You know that as well as I.
Except that I first made the error, and note that I admit openly that it was an error, multiple posts ago, and you waited until now to correct it.Attempting to twist my words into suggesting I deny the canonicity of the Shards is rather absurd.
The posts I actually made cannot reasonably be taken that way. The key word is "reasonably."It seems your issue is with me and not the information I'm providing. In which case, I suggest you contact me privately and we'll resolve it there.
There is fairly scant "official" or "canon" information on Paws. Martyna's player has conveyed it well. Tradition has assigned the name to the shanty town outside of Britain, on the west side, and there's also other non-canon fiction which is oft-mistaken, by yourself in this thread and by myself when I wrote the UO Guide article on Paws, for canon.Now how about we get this thread back on topic?
No one, until you, questioned whether or not canon lore existed. You merely mistook non-canon for canon lore, as I once did as well. I was plainly wrong, as you are now, and as I was on what you meant by "shattered worlds." I admit that freely and openly.UO doesn't have a canon and the lore changes with each developer turnover.
That lore is not cannon and if fact much of it cannot even be used according to my sources. Remember that as fondly as some of us want to remember the seers they sued EA. I would challenege anything they put together being volunteers as cannon. Also much of it only came from that one thing. It never seems anyone acted on it. I view that as cannon for the shard that seer worked but not for anything else. I am assuming that your talking about Shattered Worlds which was already discussed.Actualy only a name was on the documents as an aurthor that wrote them up as guidelines about Ultima Online and it's cities. But the source that had them all and found them remembers they was all written up by several game masters and several seers back in 97-98. Alot of people lived around Austin back then and played UO, I really think this is a group of people who got together and worked on all the lore, but just like anything else or other themes things always change over the years or reworded differently. Alot of history in the ultima series