Less than 0.5% works for the television networks (about 5000 households determine what you watch) and the Gallop polls. It also works here as well.
Ok...
When you looked up that stuff, did you bother to read up on how they
select the people that participate?
That's the fundamental point... So, I'll try and illustrate it...
If you ask PKs what is bad for the game, they'll likely say Trammel.
If you ask a crafter what's bad for the game, they'll likely say resource randomisation.
If you ask a merchant what's bad for the game, they'll likely say duping.
If you ask any group of people, who are united with common interests, a question. They'll generally answer it differently to those united with a different interest.
So, you need to ask different people, with different backgrounds and interests, so as to avoid biased results.
The smaller the sample size, unless you're
deliberately selecting people with different backgrounds and interests, the more likely your sample will be subject to bias.
So, to your "
It also works here as well"...
No, it doesn't.
In your credit, though.
I don't believe you're deliberately biasing your sample, in order to get results to support your own opinions.
I could name a handful that would.
I believe you genuinely don't realise the problems with your sample.
Incidentally, I don't entirely disagree with the "few people use KR" point of view, either.
What I do disagree with is the presentation of weak or biased evidence, to support an argument.