G
Guest
Guest
<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
Has any of the 'naysayers' stopped to think about how much our 'small team' is getting done and how quickly? It's just simply amazing and it really tells me how much they are dedicated to this game to work so deligently on TSO-EAland to make it work.
[/ QUOTE ]
In another thread, you had this to say:
<blockquote><hr>
I realize some people may be frustrated but calling names and being jerks just doesn't do much to earn my sympathy at all.
[/ QUOTE ]
and this:
<blockquote><hr>
So I will not validate further anyone that wants to continue with attacking fellow members of this board by implying in negative tones that they are butt-kisser, chearleaders or any other such derogatory comments.
[/ QUOTE ]
But it's ok, if *you* do it?
Just askin'
[/ QUOTE ]
'naysayer' is alot less derrogatory than the other categorizations I've heard, namely whiners, negative nancies, crybabies.....etc. etc. etc. I think Dutch was rather restrained simply saying 'naysayers' which is a broad term for anybody that has either nothing at all positive to say, or at least more than 50% negative to say, without bothering to make it constructive in the slightest (as Hot said it's not so much every complaint that gets on the nerves it's when you can read the author of a post and without reading a word of it pretty much bank that its gonna be negative, which tends to make one who is trying to remain positive involuntarily cringe
<blockquote><hr>
Has any of the 'naysayers' stopped to think about how much our 'small team' is getting done and how quickly? It's just simply amazing and it really tells me how much they are dedicated to this game to work so deligently on TSO-EAland to make it work.
[/ QUOTE ]
In another thread, you had this to say:
<blockquote><hr>
I realize some people may be frustrated but calling names and being jerks just doesn't do much to earn my sympathy at all.
[/ QUOTE ]
and this:
<blockquote><hr>
So I will not validate further anyone that wants to continue with attacking fellow members of this board by implying in negative tones that they are butt-kisser, chearleaders or any other such derogatory comments.
[/ QUOTE ]
But it's ok, if *you* do it?
Just askin'
[/ QUOTE ]
'naysayer' is alot less derrogatory than the other categorizations I've heard, namely whiners, negative nancies, crybabies.....etc. etc. etc. I think Dutch was rather restrained simply saying 'naysayers' which is a broad term for anybody that has either nothing at all positive to say, or at least more than 50% negative to say, without bothering to make it constructive in the slightest (as Hot said it's not so much every complaint that gets on the nerves it's when you can read the author of a post and without reading a word of it pretty much bank that its gonna be negative, which tends to make one who is trying to remain positive involuntarily cringe
