Ugh, if you think the first bit was "perfectly readable" then I bet you think this one got you an A+ in English?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~LOL. Actually, I did receive all straight A's in English when I was in college. Even I wouldn't know it now. However, I do love to write, and have written some short stories. Time period based ones.
However is poiting fingers at gramatical errors is one of your attempts to put me down or whatever, you have failed, because I seriosuly could care less.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why would I defend the person I just mocked? Logic....please try to use it in the future.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Present me with something logical and I will be happy to. Sitting on the fence and tossing stones but be lonely.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Pointing out the obvious has nothing to do with K-D. Sorry if you think everything is about you, but it is not.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow in what context did you derive that from. Never said it was about me, or that everything was about me. You might be reaching there on that one just a tad.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2. The difference between being a ripoff and being "common" is that to rip something off you have to take the ideas that only one other individual has presented. Being common means you only have a set number of skill/items/possibilities and thus "ripping off" a guild, as apposed to ripping off a "template" are not comparable, but then with your already poor comprehension skills I wouldn't expect you to get that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My comprehension skills are just fine. But I wouldn't expect you to actually not talk around the issue. Rip-off can actually mean many things: deprive somebody of something by deceit, A product or service that is overpriced or of poor quality. Something, such as a film or story, that is clearly imitative of or based on something else. An act of exploitation.
the act of stealing.
So again I ask in what exact (EXACT) way has K-D deprived anyone by deceit, clearly imitated something else (and whom????), commited an act of explotation, or commited the act of stealing?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3. How can you have been "one of the other people" it is honestly impossible, or if you have been then you understand that you are in the way since you know that when you were one of the other people, those people you are with now were in the way thus are still in the way....your argument on this is not logically, specially since I stated I wont testify to it. Do you know what that means? It means I am not witnessed to it, But I presented the most logical argument you failed to notice when you responded the first time, and failed again after I pointed it out
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Easy I was in other guilds on this shard. That was easy enough to explain.
So you are saying you won't testify to it, but yet you will attempt to argue a point that you are not wisteness to. That is rather naive of you. And yet you still have no arguement.
Unless you are trying to argue under the impression that since you aren't a witness to anything and wont tesify to anything gives you any credibility, then Im sorry to tell you it simply doesn't.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4. How does what you say argue what I pointed out? How are you a part of the "other" people, when I never mentioned "other people" Just because you do peerlesses slower than I do them with less amounts of people, does not mean you were ever part of the "other people" to assume you were is to assume you were a part of my group, and you were not.
Again I will point out I have no reason to defend Comic, I simply presented a logical argument which you have yet to counter. Simply because they are "structured" does not make them "good". While you are at it, you may want to stop assuming things, I need not present "facts" in a theoretical argument, I said I will not testify to anything I said previously, as I did not witness anything and only provided you the most logical reasons you fail to see how your argument is well, not logical.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You know what is very funny about all this is that you truly believe the line of bs you are putting out there. "I'm going to argue, but have no logical basis or facts to do so with, I will just throw stones and see if one lands." That isnt debating or arguing a point. It is just throwing stones.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Didn't they teach you anything in school? I assume not since you can not provide a logical argument and only present randomization in an orderly fashion, How you even began to argue points 3 and 4 is beyond me...And with such impeccable English too. BTW I don't care about your "long lovely nails that drive the boys nuts" there are thousands of people who have nails and 0 typos and type faster than you, also some of the crap you spew is not even a typo....when you put a word before another word that should have been after said word, it's not a typo, it's poor English. So I would have to say it is from lack of education and not "nails".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How suprising.....throw more stones....how futile. Predictable.. Futile.. Mindless.. Pointless... but go ahead whatever works for you.
ftr......I didn't say drives the boys nuts - just my boyfriend.
And I have yet to spew and so called crap. I have simply pointed out that there are 2-3 guys on this particular topic that are trying to take on one female. The most they have done is pointed out some typos, and some grammatical errors and well thats it.
I have asked for actualy information in return, statistics, facts etc.....the things people in the real world use to argue points. Not how many typos a person has.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Once again I need to remind myself to stop having intellectual battles with those who are unarmed.