<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
Some people do not want spellcasters using Mage use weapons because the
Mage has no weapon skills. If this is true then why should non-spellcasters
have weapons that cast spells if they have no Magery skill?
Should those weapon with spell hit go away?
*stares*
Yahaxithonix
[/ QUOTE ]
“Some people” can do as they please, others can do otherwise. Why should one person's game mechanics ideas be imposed on everyone? We could argue ad infinitum about various skills being bad for this or that (see the various tamer / stealth discussions).
But in the end ours is an individual rights kind of game, not a democratic game. If we voted and limited everything to the winning template (say mage), this would be one boring place to spend time.
[/ QUOTE ]
Finally someone took noticed that continous snipping this and that which reduces
all play ... I agree that no template should be that primary strategy. I have
noticed that people say this and that in the name of the good of the game, but
really only want to remove opponents' strategy.
Someone wanted to diminish Magery...diminish Stealth, disminish < put any skill here>,
and many have already have diminished Stealing, Archery, Necromancy, etc...
If someone say X must go then someone strategy is diminished...so someone else
will say Y must go to counter a different strategy.
Eventually, we converge to and very small selection of Templates.
"Why should one person's game mechanics ideas be imposed on everyone?"
I have noticed that is happening...Strategies that I use are going away... with
nothing to replace them.
So, until this clipping of my strategies, I must continue to try to clip others.
*stares*
Yahaxithonix