Let's say Magincia does become Luna, in some sense, with the rebuilding.
It doesn't necessarily have to, but let's say it does.
Is that really all bad?
What this means, among other things, is that the nexus of commerce shifts back to one of the main cities, one of the Virtue Cities (though of course Magincia strayed from Humility into Pride), one of the older cities.
Further, as I recall the reason Magincia was said to have gotten rich enough to be as Prideful as it was, was commerce. So it's not like the city doesn't have commerce in its past. In Ultima lore, Magincia became the Humility-based New Magincia, but that doesn't necessarily mean it has to here. And further, not like it won't. It may well. If it doesn't, I can see roleplaying potential in the tension between a city reaching back to its Prideful past and attempting to build a Humble future at the same time.
So, if Magincia did become the new Luna....Why is that necessarily bad?
Yes, it's an honest question, I am genuinely curious.
-Galen's player
It doesn't necessarily have to, but let's say it does.
Is that really all bad?
What this means, among other things, is that the nexus of commerce shifts back to one of the main cities, one of the Virtue Cities (though of course Magincia strayed from Humility into Pride), one of the older cities.
Further, as I recall the reason Magincia was said to have gotten rich enough to be as Prideful as it was, was commerce. So it's not like the city doesn't have commerce in its past. In Ultima lore, Magincia became the Humility-based New Magincia, but that doesn't necessarily mean it has to here. And further, not like it won't. It may well. If it doesn't, I can see roleplaying potential in the tension between a city reaching back to its Prideful past and attempting to build a Humble future at the same time.
So, if Magincia did become the new Luna....Why is that necessarily bad?
Yes, it's an honest question, I am genuinely curious.
-Galen's player