Like I said, everyone gets into 8th grade name calling. You all dont get it. This guy isnt good or bad. Its not the issue. Maybe his dad could whip your dad. Or you dad could whip his dad. Who freaking cares.
He said how he plays. I could do the same and toyed with the IDEA.
He isnt the problem.
The solution is saying all God's creatures should be honest and loving. If we all stopped buying dupes... BLAH.
The problem is the GAME. EA fails to make the game safe. They fail. You can curse the cheats, dupers, players that buy hammers. I dont care. Curse each other, maybe start a gang war.
Dont lose sight of the point. EA is failing.
Its like saying we wouldnt need banks in real life if people would just respect each other and not rob each other. Aint going to happen.
Its a game. Improve the game integrity.
Im pissed about all that armour in game. Not at this fellow. The fact EA allows the game to be strip mined.
Here you go. You the big chees of EA.
1. Contact all the people in the world that play or would play UO and ask them to not cheat, dupe, or sell for real life cash.
OR
2. Fix the game so cheating and duping is harder (and move towards even making harder and dont stop) and make the need for buying items less necessary.
What would you pick.
OR
3. Enforce the rules in your OWN TOS & ROC by cracking down hard on cheaters/dupers/dupe dealers
OR
4. Announce to all that certain players are favored by the company and allowed to do as they please and everyone else can either like it or lump it
OR
5. Sell licenses for $10,000 a year to those who wish to make a real life financial profit by selling UO virtual items/gold then MONITOR those accounts that hold licenses to ensure that they are operating legitimately AND keep a running list of all char names on those accounts on UOherald.com so that players ingame can also monitor their activities
OR
6. Rewrite the rules and allow EVERYONE who plays to cheat by scripting afk, duping, hacking and dupe dealing, not just those profit irl financially from doing so
OR
7. Sit around with your thumb up your ass while a handful of subscribers make a mockery of your company's policies by breaking the rules left and right, AND WATCH THE HONEST PLAYERS CANCEL THEIR SUBCRIPTIONS
OR
8. Apply for federal bankruptcy protection due to the staggering loss of income from all the gamers who got fed up with your inability to provide even the faintest semblance of a level playing field for ALL players in your online games and left for greener pastures.
Someone at EA "blamed" 150 accounts for owning duped val runic hammers in bulk.
Those 150 accounts were "blamed" into oblivion.
According to Jeremy 30 or more dupes was grounds for actioning those accounts, this guy proves in a very public way that he owned at minimum 40 duped val hammers SINCE the bannings (he did not sell valorite runic crafted armor prior to the bannings).
I agree that cheaters aren't ENTIRELY to blame in situations such as the val runic dupings.
I DO blame EA for being totally lax for a long time in enforcing their OWN RULES.
It seems that at least 95% of Pacific players seem to think that UO is not worth playing unless they can script skills while afk and/or buy scripted or duped items because they're cheaper, or even that cheating is ok because the cheaters are their ingame 'friends'.
Therefore EA does deserve 50% of the blame for allowing this guy to think that he can cheat in broad daylight.
This guy knew full well that he was buying dupe val hammers and so he deserves the other 50% of the blame for supporting the dupers actions.
The only difference is that if EA DID THEIR JOB properly, this guy would be account #151 "blamed" into oblivion for possession of 30 or more dupe val runic hammers, a stern lesson would be sent to those who contemplate cheating in UO, and the cheaters would then be 100% to blame for any cheating they do afterwards in UO.
I too have to wonder if all those banned over this were truly guilty when I hear what is ongoing on Atl and I see with my own eyes what continues to go on on Pacific with people still in possession of these duped val runics in large numbers.
Who was it that was in charge of deciding who got banned and deleted?
The more I hear and see the more it's beginning to sound like it might have been a rival broker who was handed the Banhammer and allowed to 'ban' those 150 accounts this time around.