Could a chat bot properly argue with paddy cakes for me
Pretty sure we don't need AI to emulate your argument with Pawain... just pick one of the following from a loop:
"Argh! Pirating and Fishin need updatin!"
"...but why hasn't that been communicated?"
"Yet again Gargs get no love... why can't that item be "better" for a Garg?" --> No need to define "better" or give example. Broad and vague are best.
"Just because you dislike me doesn't mean my idea isn't good"
"You don't have to respond to my thread if you don't like the idea" --> this a good one because you like to hijack other threads with your disagreeing thoughts
(Insert some random negative insult about the Dev team)
I think that pretty much captures 90% of your arguments. They are all pretty basic enough that they can be used interchangeably.
While I'm at it I'll give Pawain's post too because it's similar to yours:
"On LS, we do stuff and get stuff"
"I don't have that problem so it's obviously user error on your end"
"This content is so good and so fun. Great job Dev team of giving everyone what they asked for"
"I don't know why everyone is so mean to Mesanna - her creampies are the best"
"Yea I knew that" --> This one is probably going to be used the most and can also be used even when wrong.
(Insert some wrong information about UO)
The trick with the responses from Pawain is that they have to be like 2-3 times more frequent than anyone else and on every single topic as people enter the frame.
So there. I just recapped every single one of your arguments together so just refer to this post next time you two lovebirds don't wanna get a room and save everyone else the time.
