Currently on TC1 anyone of the appropriate security level can use the box - there is some debate internally over whether or not this is a bug, though. We should see a resolution before the pub goes to Origin.
- Tradeable or not?
Currently:
"It can only be placed in a house by the owner or any character from the owner account."
I mean, is that not true of every item 'placed' in a house ('placed in a house by owner' is just vague enough to consider you are merely suggesting it be placed by the
current owner of the CDB... see what I mean?)?
I'd really like to see the details updated (to make it known they are like the red soulstones) to say:
CDBs are account specific - CDBs do not work on accounts other than the one that was used to claim it.
+ it can only be used by ... whatever the internal debate determines.
Why? Because I have hopes that resource scriptors will have to pay at least one year in order to benefit from these CDBs.
For this would give a chance for the players to assist in getting them busted more easily (they would still have to script some additional actions, rather than simply deed everything out and move stuff to their vendors), which would be of great benefit to a new expansion that looks to have an improved focus on player crafting.
That is, IF the GM's step-it-up and begin busting them a bit more, perhaps by using tools to observe, or just silently observing manually, rather than just allowing them to respond that they are inded present, uhhuh, even though they are also presently observing their multiple other scripts operate.
As to the internal debate: IF they are account specific (thus only placable in a home owned by and a character of the same 1yr+ account that claimed it), then I feel it would not matter who used it IF they were given access to the house. Why? Because if a cheater is using throwaway accounts and going to one of their 1 yr+ accounts, then you can just ban both of them once it is brought to a GM's attention & even if a paid account is found to be cheating their resource gains and abusing 'their friends' CDBox rather than more publicly moving stuff to a bank, then you can just action both of their accounts as the home owner would be an accomplice... at least that's my thinking on it
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"