A new edition of the Ultima Online Newsletter has been released you can read the newsletter via the Continue Reading link below.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...
I was very frightened but I noticed this is for EM tools and not champion spawns, so I just very careful about this all right now;Anyone else frightened by this?
Maybe not frightened but extremely disappointed.Anyone else frightened by this?
So what have they been doing all year so far? Working on something that they still haven't announced or even hinted at I guess...
4. Can we upgrade search abilities for the Jewelry boxes for different attributes?
Since you have been asked this question for awhile, maybe, just maybe, you should take it off your "yeah, yeah, we'll consider it if we are bored" backlog and move it up to the next publish? Search is not something revolutionary that you need to allocate huge resources to.We have been been asked this question for a while now, each time we tell you it's on the list. While this upgrade is not slated for this coming publish, we do have the feature request in the backlog and will let you know when we plan to implement it.
This 10000%. I thought the exact same thing. Jewelry boxes are pretty new and I'm sure they could re-use the same logic as Vendor Search without breaking anything. I feel like they could have easily do that rather than code another artisan reward very few will use. Seems like a lot of effort goes towards decoration and pixel crack rather than functionality these days.Since you have been asked this question for awhile, maybe, just maybe, you should take it off your "yeah, yeah, we'll consider it if we are bored" backlog and move it up to the next publish? Search is not something revolutionary that you need to allocate huge resources to.
I don't think it's the big announcement. They mention still working on publish 110.Honestly, if this is the "big announcement" I'd recommend them looking up the word big. Underwhelming would be an understatement.
I can tell you from first hand experience that some of those numbers are bogus. They are actioning legit player accounts and passing it off as catching real cheaters.A part of the newsletter no one has commented on so far:
The following are actions taken on accounts that were banned or suspended during the month of May:
28 - Multiboxing
The following are actions taken on accounts that were banned or suspended during the month of March:
2 - Multiboxing
Taking out 28 multiboxers at once compared to the 2 from the previous newsletter. Great job to the GM's for enforcing the rules against the people who almost single handedly destroy the fun of EM events!
Banning legit players to pump up stats they don't even have to reveal to us is ridiculous. Furthermore, banning legit players is literally taking money out of their own pockets.I can tell you from first hand experience that some of those numbers are bogus. They are actioning legit player accounts and passing it off as catching real cheaters.
Naw.... They banned him for multiboxing. He showed us how he uses 4 monitors, seems legit. Dude took his ban like a champ though. Didn't threaten to quit or cry like a silly little girl, I for one am surprised and impressed.Banning legit players to pump up stats they don't even have to reveal to us is ridiculous. Furthermore, banning legit players is literally taking money out of their own pockets.
Your conspiracy theory is View attachment 108693 .
Yes, banning legit players out of sheer ignorance is a pretty sad business practice, but they are doing it.Banning legit players to pump up stats they don't even have to reveal to us is ridiculous. Furthermore, banning legit players is literally taking money out of their own pockets.
Your conspiracy theory is View attachment 108693 .
You are right, but we have at least one GM who can’t tell the difference.You can take multiple accounts places. Auto follow in the CC. I have a bard chasing my mages around in a party so i get the extra mana regen.
Someone accused me of mukti bixing for that. Its like, naw, just auto follow.
You will know multi boxing when 6 toons on the same tile cast the same spell at the same time on the same target.
UWF. Because UWF can field 30+ people at a guild hunt, Atlantic's EM Roenick asked UWF to attend a test of the new EM Tools on TC. He created a unique Champ Spawn, that had Ladies of the Snow, Greater Poison Eles, and other spawn, with the Champ looking like a blaze Pyros from the Invasion, with Dark Father AI.Who has been on test center?
Yep. I have my 7 Throwers auto following around my Bard/Mage in Town Invasions on a dead shard. When i find an Archer General, i have to alt-tab between screens and manually attack the General on all of my Throwers. Once they're all attacking, i'll switch to my Bard/Mage, and try to Discord the General. It's a major pain in the ass, but it's a fast way to drop the General and try to get Bane Soul Glaives. VERY few Gargoyle chars doing the Invasion, so Bane Throwing Weps are pretty rare, especially the Soul Glaives, which i want for my Throwers.You can take multiple accounts places. Auto follow in the CC. I have a bard chasing my mages around in a party so i get the extra mana regen.
Someone accused me of mukti bixing for that. Its like, naw, just auto follow.
You will know multi boxing when 6 toons on the same tile cast the same spell at the same time on the same target.
That's where i have my Bard/Mage and Throwers, lol.Get a few on napa and i will buy some.
This.*yawn*
Have they published an updated list of approved programs?19 - Third party program
Not an updated one. The old one was UO Assist, UO Cartographer, UO Automap, and like one or two others which are map related.Have they published an updated list of approved programs?
People who played on a legally gray servers used 3rd party apps on real servers and were surprised by the punishment? There are so many things wrong with this, I'm not sure of the best place to begin. It would be a very broad statement to say that playing a free shard wrong to begin with, but at the same time, it is.They might want to actually make a list of what's illegal before banning people from using illegal software they didn't know was illegal....anyone who ever played on a freeshard thinks those 'extra' programs are okay because they all use them on the 'other' shards. Almost every new player on Europa who came from free shards was using them and thought they weren't doing anything wrong, seems harsh to ban people for something if you are not making it clear it's not allowed. The Producer telling people to 'win any way they can' didn't really help either.
You have first hand experience being banned for multibotting? You suggest 'cheaters' are not 'real?' - Which part were you 'actioned' for? Being super-legit or real-cheater?I can tell you from first hand experience that some of those numbers are bogus. They are actioning legit player accounts and passing it off as catching real cheaters.
EA DID NOT give away the code for FREE it was stupidly included on a disk so people could play off line as a stand alone game. All free servers are illegal no matter what you may think and yes EA in their own stupidity did not go after these free servers, are they still breaking the law, yes, but trying to get a judge after all these years to do anything would IMHO be a futile endeavor.@Xare They gave away their own code, for free, if those free servers were completely illegal then EA would surely have closed them years ago, EA has done nothing about them, so they multiplied. If they had taken some action, even some token action against some of them to protect their own valuable property then we wouldn't be having this conversation, but inaction seems to be a part of UO.
There have been a lot of players that played on free shards first and then came to the official ones, how many of them were even aware that this game was still around until they stumbled onto it? I've spoken to a few that seemed a bit confused about the term 'official' let alone knew that cheat programs were not allowed, until someone told them.
This is inaccurate.EA DID NOT give away the code for FREE it was stupidly included on a disk so people could play off line as a stand alone game. All free servers are illegal no matter what you may think and yes EA in their own stupidity did not go after these free servers, are they still breaking the law, yes, but trying to get a judge after all these years to do anything would IMHO be a futile endeavor.
Did I say illegal? Nope; I said legally gray. Went back and checked just to make sure.@Xare They gave away their own code, for free, if those free servers were completely illegal then EA would surely have closed them years ago, EA has done nothing about them, so they multiplied. If they had taken some action, even some token action against some of them to protect their own valuable property then we wouldn't be having this conversation, but inaction seems to be a part of UO.
There have been a lot of players that played on free shards first and then came to the official ones, how many of them were even aware that this game was still around until they stumbled onto it? I've spoken to a few that seemed a bit confused about the term 'official' let alone knew that cheat programs were not allowed, until someone told them.