There are some news about the misterious fragments? Are the implemented? Tia
YESNo, it doesn't work for me. Please, answer to me simply. I have a lot of fragments. Thery are implemented? It's a simple question....
So what? Good riddance.There are only a few warnings that are an instant banable offense. If we banned members for posting images showing illegal 3rd party programs, a good portion of Stratics members would be gone.
The same could be said of every infraction. Plain and simple is that if we banned everyone for every infraction, there would be very few members left. Some would ban anyone who trolls or attacks someone. Everyone has an opinion on how things should be run and what should be allowed. When Stratics was purchased, a lot of effort went into seeing what the members wanted and did not want. The current RoC was built around that as was the Progressive Discipline Points System. Most warnings issued are argued as well as when others want warnings issued. The RoC keeps things in place and fair.So what? Good riddance.
Evidently you want cheaters on your forum. The only question is why?
Or just go play a single player game, because if there are humans playing, they will cheat.If you are really that upset about cheating, I suggest directing it towards people that can stop it such as Broadsword.
And you have to stand still until the fragment has vanished. That is what I heard. Otherwise it will not change you title.Ivory: It takes EIGHT OF THE SAME fragment at the correct spawn (matching the color of the virtue).
Also fails to update if you move so you may have to drop more than the 8 required to start the encounter if you move around while dropping them.And you have to stand still until the fragment has vanished. That is what I heard. Otherwise it will not change you title.
Thanks for your words. Obviously I'll to not use the forum again if my posts are considered trolling and I risk a stupid ban. But it's not fairThe same could be said of every infraction. Plain and simple is that if we banned everyone for every infraction, there would be very few members left. Some would ban anyone who trolls or attacks someone. Everyone has an opinion on how things should be run and what should be allowed. When Stratics was purchased, a lot of effort went into seeing what the members wanted and did not want. The current RoC was built around that as was the Progressive Discipline Points System. Most warnings issued are argued as well as when others want warnings issued. The RoC keeps things in place and fair.
I always find it odd that when we get tough we are told that we need to let discussions happen and give more leeway but then at the same time they want us to ban people for one offense at the drop of a hat. Again, if we came down on every offense, there would be very few users. If you are really that upset about cheating, I suggest directing it towards people that can stop it such as Broadsword.
Check your PM. I was not referring to you as trolling or being banned.Thanks for your words. Obviously I'll to not use the forum again if my posts are considered trolling and I risk a stupid ban. But it's not fair
OkCheck your PM. I was not referring to you as trolling or being banned.
But do you think I would have posted a screenshot where you could see that it was open if I had a guilty conscience? I don't even know what a script is. And yes, easyUo was open but I wasn't using anything. But it's ok, i don't careThey are referring to you using an illegal 3rd party program... evidenced by a post you made showing it in a screenshot you posted... which I'm fairly sure you know you shouldn't use.
Not upset. Just disappointed.The same could be said of every infraction. Plain and simple is that if we banned everyone for every infraction, there would be very few members left. Some would ban anyone who trolls or attacks someone. Everyone has an opinion on how things should be run and what should be allowed. When Stratics was purchased, a lot of effort went into seeing what the members wanted and did not want. The current RoC was built around that as was the Progressive Discipline Points System. Most warnings issued are argued as well as when others want warnings issued. The RoC keeps things in place and fair.
I always find it odd that when we get tough we are told that we need to let discussions happen and give more leeway but then at the same time they want us to ban people for one offense at the drop of a hat. Again, if we came down on every offense, there would be very few users. If you are really that upset about cheating, I suggest directing it towards people that can stop it such as Broadsword.
Banning people here won't stop them from doing what they are doing. No one is running around in-game saying, "I only script so I can make cool screenshots on Stratics." When we see or have reported pics we remove them, and the person gets a warning or when people link to or names/endorses the programs the links/references are removed and the person gets a warning. One of two outcomes results from this, either the person stops posting images showing the programs running, linking to naming these programs or they eventually collect enough warning points to receive a ban. Either way, it achieves the same result: The offending content isn't on Stratics and the person keeps doing what they were doing in-game.Not upset. Just disappointed.
Disappointed in a forum that has a chance to at least do their part to better this game but choose not to.
I agree 100%I"m so glad this thread was cleaned up with the removal of my reply, it's much cleaner in here now.
I don't lnow what Rz is. I use uoassist far from 14 years and it is very helpful, But i have many accounts ( with uoassist each) and i normally use tamers, t-hunters and fishermen. I have a lot of tamers because I love to have so many different petsSome people download Rz for use together with free shards.
Since 20 years I prefer uo assist. This were good invested $`s.
Nevertheless thoose fragments have a use, I can empty the chests. Don't forget only one tabard each char. That costs me some fragments and time.