if this is coming from the guy who tried to defend non-disruptable 50 damage holy fists, then i take it as a compliment.Rofl Paithan, you make me giggle all the time
if this is coming from the guy who tried to defend non-disruptable 50 damage holy fists, then i take it as a compliment.Rofl Paithan, you make me giggle all the time
Escaping and evading part you must have missed, which whether you like it or not is a part of PvP in that regard I own youI took into consideration your first sentence of how you aren't a competent pvper, which pretty much sums up why you aren't aware of what you are talking about, but decided to respond anyways.
Ahhh the first and last argument of the one trick pony PK. If you can't kill them just say they don't understand to make yourself look more competent.I took into consideration your first sentence of how you aren't a competent pvper, which pretty much sums up why you aren't aware of what you are talking about, but decided to respond anyways.
I knowTyrath paithan is an old fox, he wants his army of 5 archers to lock mortals and insta kill ppl. Ofc he hates if someone can remove the mortal fast, they want 0 competition, v sad
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Tyrath paithan is an old fox, he wants his army of 5 archers to lock mortals and insta kill ppl. Ofc he hates if someone can remove the mortal fast, they want 0 competition, v sad
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Ummm.. I have made my argument. No one is giving a reason why remove curse is balanced by being cast 2x faster minimum than curses AND removing multiple curses.Ahhh the first and last argument of the one trick pony PK. If you can't kill them just say they don't understand to make yourself look more competent.
I forgot about how you can spam mortal, so that is a great point you make. (sarcasm)Tyrath paithan is an old fox, he wants his army of 5 archers to lock mortals and insta kill ppl. Ofc he hates if someone can remove the mortal fast, they want 0 competition, v sad
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Keep it on topic. Because I have no idea what you mean. Other than t
From what I could comprehend from your post... i never said removing a curse should be longer than the curse. I said it should be the same cast as the faster curses (curse, oath, corpse) etc.
your argument is maybe simple, but obviousely more or less you and your bunch of curse gankers are the only ones who got the same opinion.My argument is simple.
Remove curse removes far too many curses AND is 2x (minimum) faster than all the curses out there. There needs to be balance. Hope that clears it up for you, bud.
it should not be the same, how useless is something when the + and the - are equal? defense should always be slightly in front of an offense.
thats the same with the "frehsly nerved mortal" because you could apply the "curse" more than remove it as the apples have a delay. now after make some adjustments the curse is not so powerful anymore and you actually have a chance to not be mortal to death.
Have you ever hears of disrupting a spell? It is very possible and quite easy to do, of course the spells to keep me disrupted are low level low damage and that just won't do will itUmmm.. I have made my argument. No one is giving a reason why remove curse is balanced by being cast 2x faster minimum than curses AND removing multiple curses.
a lot of people gave reasons but you just ignore it.Ummm.. I have made my argument. No one is giving a reason why remove curse is balanced by being cast 2x faster minimum than curses AND removing multiple curses.
It wouldn't be useless as all. You could still get that off before any offensive spell (4th circle and above) is cast again. The only damaging spells below that have delays other than harm. So you could get off a remove curse before the next offensive spell. lol. And remove curse is not "slightly" faster than the curses. It is a ridiculous 2-4x faster.it should not be the same, how useless is something when the + and the - are equal? defense should always be slightly in front of an offense.
thats the same with the "frehsly nerved mortal" because you could apply the "curse" more than remove it as the apples have a delay. now after make some adjustments the curse is not so powerful anymore and you actually have a chance to not be mortal to death.
I am talking about one v one and balance of spell cast time vs effectiveness.The Paithan 's game is simple guys: he has 5 archers with elemental bows ok.... He casts a curse... And u get rekt with moving shots because the bows hit on the resists set to 60 due the curse.... So if u higher the time of a remove curse u end up getting slaughtered with 5 armour ignores because highering the timer is simply ridicolous. If u want hyper offensive make an alchemy archer- hyper defensive make a chiv char. He wants to remove the opposite of what they fight against!!
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Agreed.. but lets keep this thread to just remove curse as it will spiral out of control if the whole lot of spells are brought up. I made a separate thread for that.I keep reading how chivalry has been in game for 13 years etc etc etc. it's a pretty simple argument actually. If you play just a basic focused Necro. You have Blood Oath, Strangle, Mind Rot, Corpse Skin, Evil Omen let's say you play a debuff support character. Let's also say those spells all take 1s to cast..which they don't, just saying for the sake of argument. That's 5 seconds of casting for a .25s negation. Never mind the mana cost and fizzle factor, the 2/6 needed in the suit, the having to stop to cast. It's completely one sided. Yes you need 4/6 casting to make it so fast, even 2 years ago it wasn't so pathetically easy to make a 4/6 suit. So to say it's been in game for 13 years it's not broken is a ridiculous argument. It was never a viable template in pvp..minus the 4/6 Mage days which are long gone and balanced out. I don't see his request as ZOMG i can't pee vee peeeeee now. Paith is actually a talented PvPer who has been for quite some time. This is a balance issue. Which I agree with..however the question remains how? Because chiv 4/6 heal/cleanse is in fact OP. I can go afk and not die 2v1...that's not balanced that's crazy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And that is exactly what this thread is about nothing more and nothing less.The chiv chars are defensive, to kill someone 1vs1 it's very hard. U cry because u want to kill anyone Within few seconds making the game unbalanced again
InfernO will come to get you![]()
I quote the perfect argument . U paithan...cry for a nerf just to make the game unbalanced again to your favour. FunnyVery much agree that PvP is well balanced at this time. Skills and the application of of highly defensive templates that are weak on damage output but hard to kill have been a large part of that. Tweaks that make sense have also been a large part and a break from nerfing a entire skill or template in a misguided attempt to bring balance. High end items being easily obtainable by anyone willing to go farm them or dumb enough to spend billions on them have leveled the field a lot as well. Bottom line is people cry for balance in order to achieve imbalance that benefits their individual playstyle and template. Then use the argument that anyone who opposes it is a idiot that doesn't understand PvP. You are dead on though PvP is well balanced and PvM is well balanced despite the power creep over the years. We really are about as good balance wise as we have ever been.
Again, this is not about chiv. It already has a super fast heal, cure, and dispel. This is about the balancing of speed for remove curse. I am not sure why you can't grasp this.The chiv chars are defensive, but try to kill someone 1vs1 with a chiv char!!!!! it's very hard. U cry because u want to kill anyone Within few seconds making the game unbalanced again
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Problem is you are expressing an opinion. Just because that is how you feel does not make it fact.My argument is simple.
Remove curse removes far too many curses AND is 2x (minimum) faster than all the curses out there. There needs to be balance. Hope that clears it up for you, bud.
Ok, if the remove curse is that much stronger than all of the other curses- the trade off is it is slowed down.Problem is you are expressing an opinion. Just because that is how you feel does not make it fact.
As far as I am concerned curse removal should be stronger when executed by a paladin... I mean after all they are paladins.
Great post that is neither accurate or on topic.Man u complain about a spell of 2003, u got rekt some fights and The World collapses...
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Yep that perfectly summed up why it can remove multiple curses at twice the speed of any of the curses. Bringing up some good points my man.well i think the answer is you can add chivalry to your character seeing as how all powerful it is.
Maybe I'm reading into this wrong but I'm pretty sure he's just telling you to add it to your template instead of nerfing it.Yep that perfectly summed up why it can remove multiple curses at twice the speed of any of the curses. Bringing up some good points my man.
Yes. That is exactly what he was saying. I was being sarcastic with my response. It did not argue the merit of it in the least bit.Maybe I'm reading into this wrong but I'm pretty sure he's just telling you to add it to your template instead of nerfing it.
Except he says he has no problem living through Chiv-users.well i think the answer is you can add chivalry to your character seeing as how all powerful it is.
"More Powerful spells = Longer cast"... with damaging and healing spells, Yes... Remove Curse is neither.Ok, if the remove curse is that much stronger than all of the other curses- the trade off is it is slowed down.
That is kind of how this game works. More powerful spells=longer cast.
A spell that is 2x faster than any of the curses and can remove multiple curses- That is most certainly the definition of a more powerful spell. It does not need to deal damage to be more powerful.Except he says he has no problem living through Chiv-users.
"More Powerful spells = Longer cast"... with damaging and healing spells, Yes... Remove Curse is neither.
Remove Curse isn't "more powerful" than any of the curses it removes. Hence why people.... remove.... curses.
Do you apple when you're effected by weaken, clumsy, or feeble mind? would you cast remove curse if you were?
The best part of this whole discussion, is I'd actually benefit from remove curse being nerfed in any way.
It sounds like you have a problem with moving shot. You can have 5 mages flame strike you when cursed and you will die too. But again, you are talking about something that has nothing to do with remove curse cast speed and effectiveness vs the curses.I mean for him is cool to cast ONE or TWO curse ...lower the resist of a target to 60 and have 5 archers moving shotting u down with a poison dmg composite.....within two screens dealing 50 dmg on the run.... Per single shot....No OP... Ok
At least a fast remove curse gives u a chance to stay alive
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Please. Elaborate. I am sure people reading the thread would like to see you make a point. I would love to hear it as well.Rofl... Poor Paithan twist reality at your favour as usual
InfernO will come to get you![]()
I can comment on how you play, I've played with you, very long ago.... and against you, (yea it's been about 2 months or so, (i haven't been actively playing UO as much lately).A spell that is 2x faster than any of the curses and can remove multiple curses- That is most certainly the definition of a more powerful spell. It does not need to deal damage to be more powerful.
You can't comment on how I play seeing as how you haven't seen me on in many months- that being said- i ABSOLUTELY would play or play with someone that is abusing a broken/powerful mechanic of the game that others are using as well. Until it gets fixed- you have to fight fire with fire. I will lobby for balance in the mean time.
I knew I was missing something, Alchemy, low/no med... tisk tisk...U have a mage with alchemy And healing and parry.... And u cry for one spell of a dexer.... Rofl
InfernO will come to get you![]()
Umm.. I haven't played in about 5 months. lol. When I did play I pvped solo and with one other person quite often. But you clearly know more than me about my pvp (again irrelevant).I can comment on how you play, I've played with you, very long ago.... and against you, (yea it's been about 2 months or so, (i haven't been actively playing UO as much lately).
But to say you absolutely would be abusing broken mechanics if they existed.... you did with the curse bug, you wouldn't fight without it... infact everyone that pvps with an against you knows it.
Your entire pvp as of the last ~6 months has been to curse/debuff people as the two or more Archers in your guild running-shot people down. It's a hell of a shocker you want one of the only things that CAN defend against that to be nerfed. I figured you'd probably try to transition into a focused necromancy to use corpse skin the same way- I'll save you some time,it's less beneficial for your group to do that.
I'd also hate to say it, but adjusting Parry the way I suggested it -tie it to a weapon skill (Wrestling/Anatomy, do not count as "weapon skills") would fix the only 4/6 chivalry template your group would EVER have a problem fighting, not only would it reduce their parry chance (vs weapons), it would also cut the damage of holy-fist.
But guess what, it would also nerf the character you play most.... "Healing,Anatomy, Parry-mage"- another shocker, I know....
come to think of it, you stack a lot of defensive skills for someone who only curses, people.
I will only respond to your posts that have any relevance with why remove curse is 2x faster than all the curses and can remove multiple curses at once. Deflection is a bad look.U have a mage with alchemy And healing and parry.... And u cry for one spell of a dexer.... Rofl
InfernO will come to get you![]()
I've said nothing about killing anyone with remove curse.I knew I was missing something, Alchemy, low/no med... tisk tisk...
No wonder he's crying about not being able to kill someone with remove curse, he'd run out of mana before he can make any progression in a fight vs 4/6.
That's what I said, "would" because you did, the last time I pvped on atlantic you were there with Tervor, De leet ed, diddles & TJ.And I said I absolutely WOULD abuse a mechanic. Unfortunately it is the only way to get things fixed. I cursed bugged just as much as anyone else. Was I happy as f when they fixed it? You better believe it.
So great post man.