That doc is incredibly outdated anyways. I think someone had a much better write-up on UOForums.
My UOForums write up is also sadly out of date. While technically accurate and all of my tactics advice from then still works, it is not the best (or even close to the best) possible manner of running a Sampire. On the other hand, some of the later posted advice is very handy.That doc is incredibly outdated anyways. I think someone had a much better write-up on UOForums.
I never claimed to be the player who came up with the Sampire template. What I did do was help others who were interested in building their own; I'm sorry that you feel that my being helpful to other players was in some way a bad thing.It really annoys me that somehow a mediocre player such as yourself managed to get credit for the standard sampire template. You and I both know you did not invent it and just copied what everyone else was doing. Just because you posted 300 times a day doesn't mean you should get credit for it and if I was more motivated I'd start working on having your name removed from the sampire page. Because unlike Lynk who actually developed a template, you did nothing but post someone else's idea.
I never had any of these templates as I did not PvP at any time during my years with UO. As I did not PvP I had no opinion on what players in Fel did with their time or their characters.That's your opinion. I believe in giving credit where credit is due and I don't like it when people get credit for stealing other people's ideas.
And if you really were around back in the day, you'd know Conoor was beyond useless, especially being the biggest archer fanbois in the history of UO. In his opinion WoD Archers, AI Archer (pre 35 damage cap), Stealth Tamer Archers (post SE), constant evasion, etc were all ok and didn't need to be adjusted.
Everyone is entitled their opinion, even when it's as inaccurate as this is. I don't even know who you are, and certainly did not spend any of my time playing the game with you, so I don't know how you would know anything about what I did with my time.Lynk at least had skills in both PvP and Pvm. Connor was only mediocre at PvM and doesn't deserve credit for jack. The only thing he gets credit for in my book was having no life and posting 300 times a day.
I guess if you consider quantity over quality, they yeah he was really useful.
Because you posted 300 times a day noob or because I played Pac before, during and after your short UO career.I don't know how you would know anything about what I did with my time.
Wanting to say hi to an old friend via PM has nothing to do with UO.Oh so you're on a UO forum and it has nothing to do with UO.......delusional liar as always.
Yep I do hate you. You're a no skill hack who sucked at UO and if it's wasn't for posting all day and night no one would know who you are.
Just go away.