-
Hail Guest! We're looking for Community Content Contribuitors to Stratics. If you would like to write articles, fan fiction, do guild or shard event recaps, it's simple. Find out how in this thread: Community Contributions
-
Greetings Guest, Having Login Issues? Check this thread!
-
Hail Guest!, Please take a moment to read this post reminding you all of the importance of Account Security.
-
Hail Guest! Please read the new announcement concerning the upcoming addition to Stratics. You can find the announcement Here!
Jeff has tweeted to say 'no'. I don't think Siege can really. The Fel side has been left alone because of pvp and the champ spawn.
Siege will get the casino, and the stewards could be quite nice.
Siege will get the casino, and the stewards could be quite nice.
Last edited:
Definitely agree with Kelmo i am quite happy to not have this on Siege, the artifacts dropping in some other way would be nice but not a huge issue if they don't. Lets face it truth is by not having this we will probably just have less bugs on Siege in than prodo shards
more alarming evidence these developers do not care about siege and really care less about felucca itself. this is why many players who are pvp driven have simply left the game.
it's turning into a trammel-based grind that doesn't take ANY skill or provide challenge.
the original creators of UO are most likely cringing at the idea of the directon this legacy of a game is heading.
it's turning into a trammel-based grind that doesn't take ANY skill or provide challenge.
the original creators of UO are most likely cringing at the idea of the directon this legacy of a game is heading.
Last edited:
im sure they care about pvp and seige if not they wouldnt have spend time messing around with factions and pvp arenas an such.Despise was bound to pose a prob for dungeon revamping on seige due to champ. Are all 5 of u really gonna be That upset that u dont have changes to your champ dungeon?if they did it would prob just mess up that champ or make it a pain somehow.
All five of us? lol
Yeah though I can understand why they didnt do it because of the champ spawn. Still it does seem an oversight on their part. Though still like someone else said before I guess we may know why Mesanna was taking a sudden interest in seemingly helping Siege..because we are getting screwed out of some content lol.i feel your pain on seige. maybe you can take solace in the fact that whenever they get around to adding the +5 you will probably have the ability to pvp for it.
on prodo shards it will probably be some tram giveaway.
on prodo shards it will probably be some tram giveaway.
the disregard for siege is blatant slap in the face to the players who have actively made it their home for the past years and further deters future prospects from coming as they seem to just ignore our shard publish after publish.
adding housing does nothing for current siege players other than brings the hope that people will come try our shard knowing they can keep their home shard house and in actuality seems like an after-thought when putting in this new dungeon revamp.
i'm guessing the conversation went something like this...
"what's next to revamp?"
"DESPISE!!!!"
"they have a champion spawn there, don't they?"
"it's okay, we'll put in in trammel only!!!!!!!"
weeks go by...
"crap, what about siege?"
"do people play there?"
"let's give them something they've been asking for for years!!!!!"
"a secondary house for players who don't play siege!!!!!"
"problem solved!!!!!!!!!"
moments like these just display the disconnection between current developers and the game PAYERS themselves. earn your paychecks and actually take into consideration changes that would better the game, not worse.
adding housing does nothing for current siege players other than brings the hope that people will come try our shard knowing they can keep their home shard house and in actuality seems like an after-thought when putting in this new dungeon revamp.
i'm guessing the conversation went something like this...
"what's next to revamp?"
"DESPISE!!!!"
"they have a champion spawn there, don't they?"
"it's okay, we'll put in in trammel only!!!!!!!"
weeks go by...
"crap, what about siege?"
"do people play there?"
"let's give them something they've been asking for for years!!!!!"
"a secondary house for players who don't play siege!!!!!"
"problem solved!!!!!!!!!"
moments like these just display the disconnection between current developers and the game PAYERS themselves. earn your paychecks and actually take into consideration changes that would better the game, not worse.
Last edited:
I cant speak for Siege, but all pvpers i know are happy Fel Despise isn't being touched. It is in fact thoughtful of the Devs to NOT change Fel Despise on shards.
Last edited:
Basara
UO Forum Moderator
Moderator
Professional
Governor
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
Wiki Moderator
UNLEASHED
Campaign Supporter
The other option would be to take a page from the shadowlord event and the Trammel Khaldun event, and create a "second Despise" (using the unused-on-Siege space for Trammel) that is accessed only through a Fel-side copy of the Wisp, and exited through teleporters at the Despise-copy's Wisp back into the main area of Siege. you'd only be copying a dungeon, not the entire Trammel facet, using resources that mostly already exist.
T
Tazar
Guest
From what I am seeing - I think it is more of an issue that the Despise content was not designed for a PVP environment. You train up your armies only to get PK'd by a stealthy killer... kinda defeats the purpose of the armies and the battle/contest doesn't it?
Sorry guys for the late response on this topic...the design that Phonix and Kyronix came up with will not work on Siege. I am sorry to say we would have to design a new dungeon just for you guys and we don't have time right now. What we are going to do is add the artifacts that you would normally find to Cora. This will only be for Siege though.
Thank you
Would it also be possible to get the artifacts from the spawn in Covetous level 3 as well as from Cora?
there are several possible alternative than adding the whole map if the space is the problem.
For example they can place a gate near fel despise that brings on trammel despise (always with pvp rules) and block the exit, and here we have 2 despise and 1 map
Yes we have added that on Siege.
Awesome, thanks a lot for the reply