• Hail Guest!
    We're looking for Community Content Contribuitors to Stratics. If you would like to write articles, fan fiction, do guild or shard event recaps, it's simple. Find out how in this thread: Community Contributions
  • Greetings Guest, Having Login Issues? Check this thread!
  • Hail Guest!,
    Please take a moment to read this post reminding you all of the importance of Account Security.
  • Hail Guest!
    Please read the new announcement concerning the upcoming addition to Stratics. You can find the announcement Here!

Is it time for a Soulstone change?

Is time for a change to soulstones?

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 36.1%
  • No

    Votes: 36 59.0%
  • Dont care

    Votes: 3 4.9%

  • Total voters
    61
K

Kayne

Guest
As per title.

Now that accounts are bound under one main account surely that means that the soulstones can have a change applied that allows any UO account bound to the EA/Origin master account to use it and transfer skills around.

Given the amount of players these days that have more than one account I really don't see it as an issue.
I can understand previously when there wasn't a way to see if the accounts were owned by the same person but now they are linked surely that negates the issue?
 
T

Tazar

Guest
As someone with a ton of soulstones - I'd have to say No. This would open the door to selling skills using unlink/relink accounts to transfer GM and 120 skills. Personally - I don't want to see that.
 

Merus

Crazed Zealot
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
UNLEASHED
My only request for soulstones is to be able to transfer blank soulstones between accounts. I am fine not being able to move skills between accounts, but if I have 10 soulstones and 3 accounts, why can't I transfer an empty one between accounts? In addition, why not be able to use blank soul stones found at IDOCs, etc.
 
F

Fayled Dhreams

Guest
As per title.

Now that accounts are bound under one main account surely that means that the soulstones can have a change applied that allows any UO account bound to the EA/Origin master account to use it and transfer skills around.

Given the amount of players these days that have more than one account I really don't see it as an issue.
I can understand previously when there wasn't a way to see if the accounts were owned by the same person but now they are linked surely that negates the issue?
yeah NO ... NOT so "surely" shirely ...(minor alliteration, sorry if it is your actual name ... >anybody<)

Changing their(soulstone) COLOR ... meh! maybe ... no harm, no foul; paint all you can.
NO POINT in allowing "allows any UO account bound to the EA/Origin master account to use it"
ONLY UO accounts >could use it< ... *wry smirk* (okay ... maybe I have missed a memo ... Not FIFA/Madden is all i'm saying)

and ... not too hard to see the future
too broke(cheap) to buy one (store / Player held token)
Too impatient to wait for a free one (yearly vet reward)
Can't find a shard/fragment on ONE shard/facet
Newly able to service multiple accounts with 1-some number
LOSES track
wants free replacement
:talktothehand: Nah ...
leave well enough alone.

+ Tazar above ... excellent consideration ... remains to be seen IF sales happen at all ...
 

Andrasta

Goodman's Rune Library
Alumni
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
UNLEASHED
I did vote no but now that I read the comments I would like to be able to transfer skills from one account to another. I think that would be great.
 
5

5% Luck

Guest
I have never understood the "account bound" premise for soulstones. I sell pets and items and everything else why not skill. Its beyond me really. The only thing worth noting is the skill "grind" is spread out over time to accommodate EA with sub time. In theory thats the basic design. SkillXtime+contentXtime=paid sub-time. Trading skills well that breaks the basic design in theory but in practice I bet it sells more!
 
F

Fayled Dhreams

Guest
How do you unlink an account?
That and actual "sales" (EA or Private) remains to be established ...

as far as I know ...

Forum?
Any sales reports SINCE the Migration started?
 

Viper09

Grand Poobah
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
I had to vote no for one reason. People will start grinding and selling skills.
 

yars

Lore Keeper
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
UNLEASHED
I had to vote no for one reason. People will start grinding and selling skills.
pinks and gold are sold for RL cash, this would only cut out some middle work anyways :)
 
T

Trebr Drab

Guest
I had to vote no for one reason. People will start grinding and selling skills.
pinks and gold are sold for RL cash, this would only cut out some middle work anyways :)
Isn't it wonderful? MMORPGs are all about the RL cash. It's become sort of like voluntary sweat shop work.

And some people actually like it.
 

Mirt

Certifiable
Supporter
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
UNLEASHED
Some are also forced to do it.
 

Viper09

Grand Poobah
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
pinks and gold are sold for RL cash, this would only cut out some middle work anyways :)
And that's comparable with how people would sell 120 skills all on a single item? No, sorry. Like comparing a castle to an 8x8.
 

Korik Bloodguard

Lore Keeper
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
Boy would I adore selling skills if soulstones became account-independent.

Who do I have to do terrible, nasty things to to have that changed? :)
 

Kylie Kinslayer

Stratics Legend
Alumni
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
UNLEASHED
Awards
1
How do you unlink an account?
Yeah, I wonder about this also. I have two accounts tied to my email address. Mine and my sons acct. He already has a 24 hour ban and another supposed "harsh warning" flagged on his acct. I definately would be up for having his unlinked from mine.


I had to vote no for one reason. People will start grinding and selling skills.
Agreed, but grinding would be the least of the problems. If you think illegal programs and afk training are bad now, it would just be the tip of the iceberg if soulstones were not account bound.

I can see the OP's point tho for folks with more than one account it would be beneficial I guess, but it would start to open a crack in the door that I think should remain closed and locked.
 
K

Kayne

Guest
As someone with a ton of soulstones - I'd have to say No. This would open the door to selling skills using unlink/relink accounts to transfer GM and 120 skills. Personally - I don't want to see that.
Actually this was one area I hadn't thought of and does open somewhat a huge flaw in the suggestion

Boy would I adore selling skills if soulstones became account-independent.

Who do I have to do terrible, nasty things to to have that changed? :)
I didn't actually mean for them to be account independant. What I meant was in someway tied to the master account so they could be used on all linked UO accounts.

Yeah, I wonder about this also. I have two accounts tied to my email address. Mine and my sons acct. He already has a 24 hour ban and another supposed "harsh warning" flagged on his acct. I definately would be up for having his unlinked from mine.


I had to vote no for one reason. People will start grinding and selling skills.
Agreed, but grinding would be the least of the problems. If you think illegal programs and afk training are bad now, it would just be the tip of the iceberg if soulstones were not account bound.

I can see the OP's point tho for folks with more than one account it would be beneficial I guess, but it would start to open a crack in the door that I think should remain closed and locked.
Again account bound to the master account not the invidual UO accounts. However as pointed out by Tazar this would promote the un-link/re-link of the UO accounts to sell skills which actually negates my suggestion because I don't want UO more broken than it already is
 

Lythos-

Lore Master
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
The ONLY change that should ever possibly happen is a turn in for idoc soulstones. Maybe turn in 5 soulstones to get one of your own.

Than again you CAN make fragments so it's not like it's that hard now.
 
T

Trebr Drab

Guest
Some are also forced to do it.
How so? Let them work Ebay, or Amazon's used movie market, or FtP games that sell themselves on RMT, but stay the hell out of my game.

pinks and gold are sold for RL cash, this would only cut out some middle work anyways :)
They've always been sold for cash, the economy keeps on chugging along reasonably well :)
Keep selling that line. The inflation and added cheating for the money has screwed this game's economy royally.

Oh, edit to add my own :) , because it's getting to the point that no one cares anymore, including me.
 

Kylie Kinslayer

Stratics Legend
Alumni
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
UNLEASHED
Awards
1
Again account bound to the master account not the invidual UO accounts. However as pointed out by Tazar this would promote the un-link/re-link of the UO accounts to sell skills which actually negates my suggestion because I don't want UO more broken than it already is
True. But I read somewhere about EA/Mythic charging like $30 for the unlink - relink thing. So I am guessing those at Corporate who's job it is to only watch the bottom line would be up for the idea lol.
 
K

Kayne

Guest
The ONLY change that should ever possibly happen is a turn in for idoc soulstones. Maybe turn in 5 soulstones to get one of your own.
Personally I prefer the idea that the Europa community went for, soulstones that fell in idoc's are given over to the Soulstone graveyard and kept for people to go and see if theirs is there so that they can get them back should they return to the game.
 

Lady CaT

Sage
Supporter
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
A big hell NO to transfering skills between accounts! It just allows people to play the game less because they no longer have to take the time to train their new character skills up again.
 

lucitus

UOEC Modder
Stratics Veteran
Stratics Legend
Iam for soulstone trading, buying 120 Magery with Powerscroll 65 million! ;) But no problem for me.
 
Top