Do you have ...la in the clipboard or do you type it each time?Hush you, get back to Eve so I can hunt you down and pod you...la
I hope that helps.WarderDragon said:The Developers have expressed interest in creating a Classic Shard. I don't want to rehash three months worth of heated debate; but the major considerations right now are what would constitute a Classic Shard (Pre-T2A? Pre-Renaissance? Pre-Pub16?)? How much post-Classic Content (Monsters, Art, etc.) should be implemented? How the shard will impact (positively or negatively) Siege Perilous? And whether it will truly draw old players back to Ultima Online?
I think the developers acknowledge that a Classic Shard would be good for Ultima Online. I tend to agree.
Why most current players are so leery of the idea is that most folks want manpower focused on their respective playstyles and interests; and see a Classic Shard as a risky idea that would draw more developer time away from the Production Shards. Because they don't have the code tucked away somewhere; the developers are going to have to manually remove all the new content and rebuild some of the old systems to return it to a Pre-Trammel State.
What does it even mean?Do you have ...la in the clipboard or do you type it each time?
What does it even mean?Do you have ...la in the clipboard or do you type it each time?
I thought it was something people from Liverpool said often, usually also at the end of sentences.What does it even mean?Do you have ...la in the clipboard or do you type it each time?
ok lets not get carried away now ...Ever since I quit playing uo, i've actually had a social life and done some productive things in my life. if they make a classic shard. ohh i'm never leaving the house again.
Actually, to be more accurate...it would be the current devs saying that everything the previous devs did for the past 10 years, without offering an alternative, was wrong.The main problem with a classic shard is it's basically saying that everything they've done for the past 10 years has been wrong, as such i find it hard to believe they'd ever make one
I don't think so. I think it would be an acknowledgement that different players possess different tastes and that Ultima Online possesses a widespread appeal not found in more linear games.The main problem with a classic shard is it's basically saying that everything they've done for the past 10 years has been wrong, as such i find it hard to believe they'd ever make one
thisIt would do nothing but bring in more revenue for Ultima Online; which in turn means more for the Production Shards and an increased lifespan for our game of choice.
Hardly. It's simply offering another choice to clients. It isn't going to replace the current game, and it's not going to draw more clients than the current game. Hopefully it will have a healthy long term population and give them a return on their investment. I think it will, and I hope it happens, and I will certainly check it out when it does, but it won't become my primary UO home.Actually, to be more accurate...it would be the current devs saying that everything the previous devs did for the past 10 years, without offering an alternative, was wrong.The main problem with a classic shard is it's basically saying that everything they've done for the past 10 years has been wrong, as such i find it hard to believe they'd ever make one
And I endorse that statement 100%.
Where did I say that it was going to replace the current game?Hardly. It's simply offering another choice to clients. It isn't going to replace the current game, and it's not going to draw more clients than the current game. Hopefully it will have a healthy long term population and give them a return on their investment. I think it will, and I hope it happens, and I will certainly check it out when it does, but it won't become my primary UO home.Actually, to be more accurate...it would be the current devs saying that everything the previous devs did for the past 10 years, without offering an alternative, was wrong.The main problem with a classic shard is it's basically saying that everything they've done for the past 10 years has been wrong, as such i find it hard to believe they'd ever make one
And I endorse that statement 100%.
I would say I am in the minority here but I would like to use the enhanced client on a classic server, and I have yet to see a free classic server that offers the option although I haven't really looked hard to be honest.I'll try to keep this post in the rules. So just hear me out. Why would someone pay monthly to play a classic shard when they can play a T2A or Pub 16 shard for free? Plus, this free thing also has lots of players and is very stable?
Biggest reasons I don't play freeshards instead (and this might change if EA doesn't come through with a Classic Shard of their own):I'll try to keep this post in the rules. So just hear me out. Why would someone pay monthly to play a classic shard when they can play a T2A or Pub 16 shard for free? Plus, this free thing also has lots of players and is very stable?
And you M'Lady, need to take a chill pill...Where did I say that it was going to replace the current game?Hardly. It's simply offering another choice to clients. It isn't going to replace the current game, and it's not going to draw more clients than the current game. Hopefully it will have a healthy long term population and give them a return on their investment. I think it will, and I hope it happens, and I will certainly check it out when it does, but it won't become my primary UO home.Actually, to be more accurate...it would be the current devs saying that everything the previous devs did for the past 10 years, without offering an alternative, was wrong.The main problem with a classic shard is it's basically saying that everything they've done for the past 10 years has been wrong, as such i find it hard to believe they'd ever make one
And I endorse that statement 100%.
And where did I say that it would draw more clients than the current game?
...It would be the current devs acknowledging that it was a mistake by the previous devs to make radical changes to the game (UOR/AOS) without offering those that wanted no part of that an alternative.
Actually...the notion that a Classic Shard would "empty out" the existing shards was first posted by anti-Classic Shard posters as their reason for being against it.It has been posted plenty of times by classic shard supporters that they thought those who thought a classic shard was a bad idea were worried that a classic shard would pull all the clients away from the regular shards.
I am not necessarily suggesting that a seperate shard be created for each and every change that comes into the game...but if you look back at how the changes were incorporated into the game, it would have made more sense if the devs would have opened new shards that had the new content, and allowed players to transfer there if they wished...instead of forcing content on the players that essentially broke their playstyles.Your statement however gives the whole subject a different slant. Although I think the game would soon become pretty unmanageable if every time there was a major change the devs created an alternative shard for those who didn't like the changes. That would entail at least three different rules sets for UO, in addition to the Siege rules set.
current status is : dead/unneeded/senceless or let say it in a short word SIEGE LIKEThe only reason I'd come back to UO rest on that really.
lrn2spellcheck...lacurrent status is : dead/unneeded/senceless or let say it in a short word SIEGE LIKEThe only reason I'd come back to UO rest on that really.![]()
agreedA classic shard wouldn't attract Trammies, so the rest of the prodo shards would be safe since most of their populations have been trammified for years...la
Isn't that how you go to work irl?...lanothing like not being "capped" naked with a spear
That's two words.let say it in a short word SIEGE LIKE![]()
rofl thats SawoIsn't that how you go to work irl?...lanothing like not being "capped" naked with a spear
What is this trolling you speak of?...laIf you are going to troll a thread, at least do it right rolleyes:
i only try to hold the same niveauThat's two words.let say it in a short word SIEGE LIKE![]()
If you are going to troll a thread, at least do it right rolleyes:
status of classic server: non-existentSo whats the status on this classic server?.
In theory, perhaps, but it's not feasible for a company to roll out content like that. It would be like WoW creating new servers for every expansion that came out, so that those who liked the old content better could stay there. It just doesn't make sense business wise. And regardless what this game *means* to us as players, one must never forget that origins/ea/mythic/whoever are nothing more than businesses....it would have made more sense if the devs would have opened new shards that had the new content, and allowed players to transfer there if they wished...instead of forcing content on the players that essentially broke their playstyles.
Actually, it's not at all like WoW creating servers for every expansion that comes out. So far, nothing WoW has released since launch has fundamentally changed the entire game.In theory, perhaps, but it's not feasible for a company to roll out content like that. It would be like WoW creating new servers for every expansion that came out, so that those who liked the old content better could stay there. It just doesn't make sense business wise. And regardless what this game *means* to us as players, one must never forget that origins/ea/mythic/whoever are nothing more than businesses.
Thanks a lot Morgana, now I want a double quarter pounder with cheese and I can't get one because I'm stuck in Iraq! ARGH! Guess I should look on the bright side, at least this COB has Subway.Some people like the Big Mac...other people like the Quarter Pounder.
Actually, it's not at all like WoW creating servers for every expansion that comes out. So far, nothing WoW has released since launch has fundamentally changed the entire game.
And you are right, EA/Mythic/Origin are businesses (were in Origin's case) ... which begs the question: Why would a business intentionally drive away their own customers.
Since the theater example was obviously not clear enough...let's use McDonald's.
Some people like the Big Mac...other people like the Quarter Pounder. If McDonald's had started their business making only the Quarter Pounder, and then decided to switch to Big Macs...wouldn't it make more sense to offer the Big Mac in addition to the Quarter Pounder, rather than just telling all the Quarter Pounder fans to F*** Off??
And some are vegetarians and/or hate MacD... bleh...Thanks a lot Morgana, now I want a double quarter pounder with cheese and I can't get one because I'm stuck in Iraq! ARGH! Guess I should look on the bright side, at least this COB has Subway.Some people like the Big Mac...other people like the Quarter Pounder.
Ohh yeah, Classic Shard FTW!
Fair enough...but McDonald's at least tries to accommodate vegetarians by offering salads.And some are vegetarians and/or hate MacD... bleh...
And sometimes its because they have management that is out of touch with what their customers want.Furthermore, restaurants discontinue popular items all the time. Sometimes it's because they can no longer afford to create them. Sometimes it's because the vision of their company is changing. Sometimes it's because they are bored...who knows why. However, it happens all the time.
Sure it will – crafters, the adventurous and the bored. Some of us Trammies play on classic shards even now.A classic shard wouldn't attract Trammies, so the rest of the prodo shards would be safe since most of their populations have been trammified for years...la
Could not disagree more with this poster.Status of the Classic Shard should be this: Not a chance in hell.
Where do you get that classic needs another client? presumably the devs would use the existing client and simply turn off the things that didn't exist past a certain point.Let them spend the time on Siege Perilous if they need a side project. Supporting a Classic Shard means supporting ANOTHER client, supporting ANOTHER ruleset, and supporting a system that is lacking the years of bug-fixes that have gone on in the interim.
Variety is the spice of life my friend.Classic Shard = Bad Idea™