Since I have neither the diplomatic experience of Irvyn, nor his responsibilities and concerns, I'm freer to express my doubts rather more bluntly than he is.
"I am indeed aware of the unrest following my appointment as King. The Citizens of Britannia, understandably so, miss their Lord British who had governed them for so many years."
'Their' Lord British, not 'our' Lord British? Odd slip for a trained Ambassador. Perhaps it's stress, or because as an Elf you were not strictly his subject? That might be it...
Lord British left a Council to rule in his stead. If he'd meant us to have a new King, there's a good case for saying he'd have proposed one. Of all people, he was most aware how dangerous our world could become. Even if the idea of a 'King' was seen as valid, the people could expect at least to be made aware of the Council's reasoning for it before the coronation.
"We must forgive these people. At these treacherous times, where citizens are being assaulted by their fellow man, they are wary of anything and anybody they do not know."
I'm not wary of everyone I do not know - only those who appear and claim authority over me. Phrases like 'treacherous times' risk spreading paranoia, don't you think? If that were someone's intent, of course....
"Let me tell you, my appointment was as much a surprise to me as it was to anybody else!"
No supporters of the idea had even mentioned the possibility to you? How strange.
"The Royal Council decided the Kingdom needed strong leadership. To survive the onslaught of evil forces a King Pro-Tempore seemed like the best solution. So, as the law dictates: the members of the Royal Council cast their votes and unanimously elected me from their midst."
A first for the Council, I think! In secret, of course, so sadly nobody could witness this rare act of unanimity. Without mentioning the idea at all beforehand. To anyone. Including you. (Or was it a case of the only surviving member making the 'vote'? To a finely trained legal mind, that could certainly be construed as 'unanimous').
A figurehead to rally behind maybe, but 'King'? That's not a necessary title (even Pro Tempore, ringing phrase devoid of meaning, as the period of time is apparently decided by the officeholder). The Council should be aware of the import of titles.
"The Royal Council is currently in hiding. They simply cannot perform their tasks effectively if they have to fear for their lives! However, they will resume their work at the castle as soon as the situation allows it."
All in hiding? Whilst the brave Casca selflessly risks himself appearing in public. All overcome with cowardice. Not one brave soul among them - how strange and disappointing. Surely one or two could stand alongside the valiant (and doubtless heavily protected) Casca? Just to confirm events and reassure their people, as good leaders would wish to do in such times, even if in fleeting appearances?
"Duke Irvyn, what happened to the Royal Council is indeed greatly distressing. The matter is under investigations and has been given the highest priority. However, this is a very complex situation with many parties involved. We need all the evidence to build a strong case against that traitor Avery!"
Until fairly tried and sentenced, the 'traitor' part is not proven - you yourself say 'we' are "still building the case". One reason for due legal processes is preventing the powerful simply declaring their version of 'justice'.
"I was a counsel for a long time myself. So the law is very dear to me. Rest assured: Justice shall be served!"
And you can always trust a lawyer. Especially one who can't tell the difference between 'accused' and 'traitor'. And can produce no witnesses to his 'unanimous election'.
Maybe you are a legitimate 'King Pro Tempore'. If mice can talk, perhaps stranger things are possible. But I rather doubt it.
Europa EMs are the best
