I still want to know if this stealth issue/passive detect is low hanging fruit.
As our representative... kat. Could you ask him?
Thanks.
In regard to your entire post, not just what I have quoted above, I do appreciate the change in your demeanor. I think calm and rational discussion will help others take you more seriously regardless of whether or not they agree with your position.
I will have to double check with Bruin on the passive detect request, as he is our designated "communicator" with Cal, but I believe the low hanging fruit has been submitted. I will double check that and if it hasn't, I will relay your request and defer to Bruins decision as to whether or not to include passive detect on that list, since I am probably closer to that issue than he is.
Fair enough?
Also... Keep in mind that some or all of the items on the current submission to Cal may not be considered LHF, so in that case, it could be considered again.
Even if it isn't LHF, passive detect could possibly be included when we get down to the more serious changes. Those have yet to be determined.
On an unrelated note, do check out the detect timer. It used to be roughly 10 seconds between uses. It has been reduced to around 5. Whether or not that was an intentional change, I do not know, as it wasn't announced, to my knowledge. It has been shortened, though.