<blockquote><hr>
Translates to – it would be a waste of time to rewrite them and I would not wish to do it, as this is just my view…….am I wrong in that assumption echo?
[/ QUOTE ]
Nope it is what I said, and my opinion, if I write a guide I do it on things that don't already 'exist' or that are not covered comprehensively enough, and would prefer to see new things rather than dredging up stuff that is already there. And frankly it is a waste of time to rewrite them unless there is new content or anything different or changed from what is already there, which there is not. BTW it isn't a translation given you are just quoting what I said directly and I make no apology for the view as it is MY view.
<blockquote><hr>
Translates to – I do not like this idea and I will use my site as I put all the hard work in there…again am I wrong? Since you have a grasp of the English language, read the words for what they are do not try to twist them.
[/ QUOTE ]
Totally incorrect. If I want info on peerless or doom I go to stratics or uoguide.com (the links I provided) where both are fully covered already. It has nothing to do with my site nor the content on my site. That is your 'warped' translation, not mine. I suggest you go back and re read what was written.
<blockquote><hr>
All I said is that you where understood we got the point you did not like the idea, you did not agree with the idea, and you would not be contributing by re writing any of your guides……and after you said this about three times in different ways I replied and told you that you where understood…nothing more nothing less.
I never said shut up I never said do not have an opinion I just simply stated that your opinion was heard the first 3 times no need to say it any more, as it is understood and its your work do with it as you see fit.
As my post before that one stated I wanted to hear from those who had not yet spoken and given there idea.
[/ QUOTE ]
And this is where you go totally wrong, firstly it is not up to you to moderate what I say on this board,
how dare you.
Anyone has access to post to this thread IF THEY WISH, so it doesn't matter what or who YOU want to hear from. If people wish to post they are free to do so and there is nothing stopping them. If I wish to expand on my 'view' on the topic that is MY right and has nothing to do with you at all, and certainly you have NO right to tell me that you have heard enough.
# My first post said I think that stuff is already covered on the links I provided on both stratics and other sites. And that specific info on any dungeon, monster etc can be asked as a normal forum thread if anyone wants to know anything further or shard specific.
# My second post was in reply to Ovr, and added suggestions to the discussion on adding links to oceania specific sites for events, guild websites, rather than dungeon guide which are ALREADY WRITTEN and only require a link as the detailed information is already comprehensively covered elsewhere, including on stratics, which Fink has also pointed out a couple of times.
# My third post was in response to Finks question, and added the fact that to include EFFECTIVE and INFORMATIVE guides for at least 6 dungeons as well as Doom in any one thread would be totally overloaded and not an effective way to find any information of any detail and not a great way to provide guides for anyone after any detailed information.
# My last post was again in response to Ovr, stating my views on what types of things new players need in addition to the already comprehensive guides already out there detailing everything from monster hps to locations to maps and explaining that a new player needs mentoring in game rather than additional guides. I also suggested a need for a 'vet' contact area so that 1:1 assistance that is shard specific could be put in and possible 'other' guides that would be of more benefit to a new player than rehashed guides already covered. I also said I would happily volunteer to put my hand up for that. I also stated quite clearly
Anyways, I don't mind if someone wants to do this, it makes no difference to me.
The fact that you can read those posts and only see one thing and ignore the other content is not my fault. That is your problem.
Other than say 'I agree' with Ovr, and this would be 'nice', may I ask exactly what discussion YOU have contributed to this thread? All I see is your failed attack on me which I called you out on. Anyone reading your comment can see clearly you were fully intending a dig at me. My site and what guides I do or don't do have nothing to do with this thread other than the fact that you decided to put your 'own' translation to my motivations in replying to my comments addressed to others and points raised by them. And the word is 'misinterpret' not 'miss interoperate' and I certainly did not misinterpret the intent nor content of your statement.
<blockquote><hr>
Amathist Said:
Echo we get it, You do not think its a good idea, you have already written guides and do not wish to do it again or to share the guides you have already written with stratics except in link form as you have them posted on your site and you want it to have the credit for them and the site having them.......we get it and understand, it is your work and you can do with it as you see fit.
[/ QUOTE ]
I understand that fully, and understand that you don't like being called out on it when you know full well what intent was behind it as I do. The fact you now try to back out by saying you have 'explained' what you meant doesn't fool anyone. And I was quoting Teeshy when she said you were basically saying 'shut up'. Funny how more than one of us read that as it
was actually intended isn't it, even though you now try to back away and make out that I am flaming you. LOL you really must think everyone is dense.
You did NOT reply to nor discuss anything I said in my posts, you tried to turn it into a troll and an attack on me with that quote, as Teeshy also pointed out she didn't know why.
And I will say again, How about you keep your opinions to yourself if they concern
ME from now on. I am not interested in anything you have to say.
The key word there is
ME, if you wish logical discussion that has to do with the
TOPIC go ahead, just don't say to me that I don't want to write guides, that I don't share my stuff, or that I only do thing because I want some kind of aggrandisment or credit which is what you were implying in your statement and then expect me or anyone to believe that is on 'topic' or even in response to some I point raised. You may be a fool, but I am not, and neither are the majority of board readers here.
And like I stated, you cannot contain yourself and need to include personal attacks again
"perhaps you should put aside your own prejudices against me and take the words for what they are and not what you feel they mean and perhaps put on a jumper so you thin skin is not so easy to prick."
If you wish to start something, I will call you out on it. It has nothing to do with thin skin, but actually challenging a person who feels she has the right to troll others at will as you have done to me in each of the few threads I have posted to in the last month or so. I have not once addressed you first in any of those threads and I suggest the moderators on this board will clearly see who on each occasion has resorted to personal insults and innuendo, and I know full well it isn't me. I suggest again that you desist.
