I saw a thread about a GM abusing power that was immediately censored and locked. Let's say the GM was in fact abusing his power, why would someone get in trouble here for warning the community? I come here for information regarding UO and I found it very useful to learn there may be a problem with a $7 an hour GM.
Does EA own Stratics? If not, why is it a crime to post threads that show EA in a negative light? I always thought Stratics was just a messenger with a slight bias towards the corporations who produce the games, not a slave to them. Most will agree these game corporations need criticism to improve their customer service and their games.
The precious few left playing UO and utilizing stratics deserve both the good and the bad news about the game. Most of us are adults playing this game and we don't need our information sugar coated or censored.
Thank you
Does EA own Stratics? If not, why is it a crime to post threads that show EA in a negative light? I always thought Stratics was just a messenger with a slight bias towards the corporations who produce the games, not a slave to them. Most will agree these game corporations need criticism to improve their customer service and their games.
The precious few left playing UO and utilizing stratics deserve both the good and the bad news about the game. Most of us are adults playing this game and we don't need our information sugar coated or censored.
Thank you