If it wasn't a problem, there wouldn't be people complaining. The only reason there's a larger group being so in favor of it: they can't play without it, and don't want to see it nerfed/removed/whatever. Also because the other people that would complain about it either aren't playing, don't pvp, or don't read Stratics very often.
I don't know how often you pvp, or who your pvp chars are, nor do I care. But let me ask you this: Why do you think the # of people pvp'ing has dwindled? That's on Atl only - the few times I've pvp'd recently, I've seen the following: Hi-5, Paith's guild, F8, !GOD, LB, plus a few others. Virtually all of the players in those guilds use some combination of pots/supernovas/alchemy, if not all 3. If Alchemy/supernovas weren't a problem, it wouldn't be so universally used. I get it, players will flock to the most overpowered thing. It doesn't become a problem unless it goes unchecked, which is currently the case with Supernova pots/Alchemy.
This is for elster and everyone else: Come up with ONE counter-argument about Supernovas being fine as they are, despite being an instantly-usable Explosion/EBolt that can't miss unless you suck and use it at the wrong time. Are me &
@CovenantX asking too difficult a question?