<blockquote><hr>
1) Are you serious about the 'not named' part? Did you know who he was talking about? So if by inference you can easily identify the individual, does it make it acceptable to simply say "but I didnt name him"? Give me a break.
[/ QUOTE ]
I had no idea who he was talking about. I still don't.
<blockquote><hr>
2) Dennis Rodman is a public figure and, as such, is not subject to the same rules of criticism in public. Neither are politicians, CEO's, etc. If the newspaper or any means of mass communication were to openly criticize and slam a non-public figure (as defined), they could be found for defamation or intentional infliction of mental duress. Being a public figure forfeits some of those aspects simply because of the necessity to criticize those individuals.
[/ QUOTE ]
Let's take the CEO example you cited. Just because a person is a CEO of a company it doesn't make them a public figure. Is there a certain limit of financial worth that a company must have to elevate the CEO into the public figure status you cited? I was the CEO of a California Corporation in the late nineties. The corporation consisted of about four people...basically I was a bookstore operator/manager, but I had the title of CEO on all legal documents filed with the state of California.
I think we also have to keep in mind the fact that we are dealing with made up names and avatars in UO. Almost every name (handle) you will encounter "online" is used by multiple people.
Also, I don't think calling someone an "idiot" fits the definition of defamation (first entry at dictionary.com: 1 : communication to third parties of false statements about a person that injure the reputation of or deter others from associating with that person ).
Honestly, how do you define a "public figure". Celebrity? Newsworthiness? A random citizen that gets shoved into the spotlight due to circumstances surrounding them (Amber Frey or a lottery winner, for example). Being in a movie? Where is the line drawn?
<blockquote><hr>
3) He was a member of this community of the forums, but sitll is a member of the shard. So where do you define commmunity and what is the purpose of this forum? To help build community on the shard and in-game.
[/ QUOTE ]
I see the "community" on stratics as just that, the stratics community. The way one posts here has no bearing on their UO account (unlike the uo.com boards, where board issues were attached directly to your uo account). Not everyone who plays on Siege posts here, and not everyone who posts here plays on siege. This is a board community.
For instance, someone may play an "evil" character who res kills and dry loots in game but may have a completely different boards persona, making lighthearted posts and having a friendly demeanor.
<blockquote><hr>
4) And granted, all people are human and deserve some slack. However, when challenged on the issue he didnt have the character to simply say: "I was wrong and I apologize for my words and setting a poor example." Instead, he sought to justify it with some lame excuses that he was having a bad day.
[/ QUOTE ]
I didn't personally say anything about that. I never brought up giving him slack. I will point out that in your mind it is a "lame" excuse, while others may not see it that way. That is your opinion. I don't have an opinoin on that either way.
<blockquote><hr>
Now given he is some type of 'super-mod', shouldn't he be held to even a higher standard?
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, again, that is your opinion on the matter. I don't think he should be held to a higher standard honestly. Now that I'm giving that issue some thought though, I think that the people who volunteer their time here might actually be given more room for error than the rest of us who post here.
Again though, I think it's ridiculous that UO/EA have to rely on volunteers to do their work. If they are going to designate boards as their "official" boards, they should be staffed with paid employees.