asked Mesanna in game and she said it is NOT an exploit because the thing has a range attack, people like to call anything an exploit these days, what happened to improvising?Yes, dont get caught.
Battling monsters from a boat when they cannot reach you is classed as an exploit.
Based on first hand experience:I don't know how to confirm this, but someone said that life leach actually damages you.
So no vamp form, no life leach from a weapon, and if this is right probably not even Curse Weapon.
I have heard people say that the Counter-Attack move is important.
Basically you can, it would appear, solo them if you fight as a "Sam" without the "pire."
I had some success on a non-Bushido dexer, but it was rough going and would have taken far too long to finish. I was glad when others jumped in to help.
They are clearly not meant to be soloed; but that doesn't mean that they aren't solo-able, just that it takes a lot of effort that the reward may not quite be worth it.
Find a group; it may well be better, more efficient, and more fun. I bet you will get more pieces over time than you would on your own.
-Galen's player
Just to rub salt into the wouldThanks to Cetric, Klapauc, Ender, and anyone else I might not have noticed for correcting me.
-Galen's player
I had absolutly no issue soloing them in 10-15minutes on a run of the mill macer sampire. *shrug* Didn't even need to knock off evades.
If that is the case, there is some unbalancing issue here, IMHO.So, conclusion, they not only meant for it to be solo'd, but solo'd by sampires!
There is nothing unbalanced here. If people prefer to play their tamer, mage , mystic or bard, its their choice. Everyone has 5 - 7 character slots and alot of people run more then one account.Then there is something quite unbalanced, here.
I mean, a Sampire is capable of killing a Blackrock "solo" in 10-15 minutes while a Greater Dragon takes about 60-90 minutes on average ?
Not to mention, groups of players which still need some 30-40+ minutes to kill a Golem....
Last I joined, there were 2 tamers with Greater Dragons, 1 archer and 1 Spellcaster. So, 4 people and 3 of them also were spellweavers and capable of casting word of death.
It took about 35-40 minutes to kill 1 Golem.
I do not see how a Sampire, alone, could be capable to do that in 10-15 minutes....
If that is the case, there is some unbalancing issue here, IMHO.
Then there is something quite unbalanced, here.
I mean, a Sampire is capable of killing a Blackrock "solo" in 10-15 minutes while a Greater Dragon takes about 60-90 minutes on average ?
A GD is really not suited for damaging the golems. GD does 100% phys. The golem has 80+ phys resists. your GD's damage gets reduced to the single digits. Plus, the golems cannot be discorded. And truth be known, GD are great tanks, but suck at doing damage. They get outdamaged by almost anything else. GDs are not the end all and be all of all pets.I had absolutly no issue soloing them in 10-15minutes on a run of the mill macer sampire. *shrug* Didn't even need to knock off evades.
Then there is something quite unbalanced, here.
I mean, a Sampire is capable of killing a Blackrock "solo" in 10-15 minutes while a Greater Dragon takes about 60-90 minutes on average ?
Not to mention, groups of players which still need some 30-40+ minutes to kill a Golem....
Last I joined, there were 2 tamers with Greater Dragons, 1 archer and 1 Spellcaster. So, 4 people and 3 of them also were spellweavers and capable of casting word of death.
It took about 35-40 minutes to kill 1 Golem.
I do not see how a Sampire, alone, could be capable to do that in 10-15 minutes....
If that is the case, there is some unbalancing issue here, IMHO.So, conclusion, they not only meant for it to be solo'd, but solo'd by sampires!
There is nothing unbalanced here. If people prefer to play their tamer, mage , mystic or bard, its their choice. Everyone has 5 - 7 character slots and alot of people run more then one account.
Popps you are pulling numbers from somewhere. Seen 3 or 4 mystics / mages doing them in 10 - 20 min. And the ones i have seen i would not call competent either.Sure, but the difference is rather large....
I mean, 10-15 minutes versus 60-90 is 6 times more using the top pet there is.....
Besides, while I can possibly agree that some solo characters might be better and even considerably than other solo characters, I cannot find this as reasonable when comparing a solo character versus a group.
A group should always be better and faster at killing anything in the game as compared to a solo character.
Instead, here we see 1 Sampire being able to kill a Blackrock Golem in 10-15 minutes when a group of 4 players, 2 Tamers with Greater Dragons, 1 Archer using Chivalry etc. and a Spellcaster, 3 of which also having spellweaving and thus capable of casting Word of Death, not being able to even get close to the time it takes to a solo Sampire to kill the golem ?
I am sorry, but I can't help but seeing this as an inbalance in the game. Or, if you will, that Sampire templates are way, but really way overpowered when they can do considerably better, alone, than even a group of 4 players.
You are using that 2 words i wanted to avoid. If archer only uses enemy of one and consecrate, it should be over in less then 30 min.the archer in that group is dropping the ball then.
If the archer gets honor in, he/she can still do just as much damage as a sampire so the archer in that group must suck.
the archer in that group is dropping the ball then.
If the archer gets honor in, he/she can still do just as much damage as a sampire so the archer in that group must suck.