The factor that they reduced current scores is great BUT towns are still worth 10,000 when they should be 100 pts for winners and 50 for the losers. (2:1 ratio as stated in publish)
This will create two major issues... people with high scores now will stop participating in VvV because their score will be reduced to the point of insignificance whereas if they just keep from doing a town they can keep an untouchable score. Second, the town scores have to be reduced by the same factor or else the exact same problem will occur with scores being to high. We don't need 10,000 scores per town, it makes the numbers in comprehensible in the span of a few days and esp in an active guild with many scores added together.
If all scores can be equally reduced and and winning a town be worth 100 pts and losing 50 it would be easy to understand to the naked eye. Personally I would support just score of 10 and 5 and reduce all current scores by that same factor (not just people who are participating now).
-Lore's Player
This will create two major issues... people with high scores now will stop participating in VvV because their score will be reduced to the point of insignificance whereas if they just keep from doing a town they can keep an untouchable score. Second, the town scores have to be reduced by the same factor or else the exact same problem will occur with scores being to high. We don't need 10,000 scores per town, it makes the numbers in comprehensible in the span of a few days and esp in an active guild with many scores added together.
If all scores can be equally reduced and and winning a town be worth 100 pts and losing 50 it would be easy to understand to the naked eye. Personally I would support just score of 10 and 5 and reduce all current scores by that same factor (not just people who are participating now).
-Lore's Player