<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
<blockquote><hr>
Seems I gave her too much credit because here she says:
Anybody with common sense knows that free players don't mean diddly.
<blockquote><hr>
Anybody with common sense knows that free players don't mean diddly.
[/ QUOTE ]That's a lie. There are plenty of people with lots of common sense who KNOW this is not true. Whether a player is free or premium says nothing about their dedication to this game or their 'status' as upstanding community members. You're proving that very point with every post in this thread, and I am appauled on behalf of every new free player I've met that they might think that your opinion represents the whole of premium players. Let me be real clear to anybody lurking and say that it DOES NOT
[/ QUOTE ]Let me try to clear the w
aters here a bit... I took what she posted to mean that "free accounts don't mean diddly..." to EA Corporate Headquarters! I'm pretty sure she was not implying that free accounts don't have an equal voice on Stratics.
[/ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately, a few posts down from that one she reiterated what she meant, which was that non-subscribing players opinions don't matter anywhere as much as subscribing players.
As far as whether or not they mean as much to EA Corporate Headquarters, I'm not sure.....because the way I look at it, if the free players voices didn't count, then the lots for the Town Hall and Community Pub would not be in the one category that free players can access as far as EA Land goes, and only subscribing members would be able to to post on the blog and the Wiki, so the fact that the meeting place between devs and players is in the residential category, and that free an premium players alike are able to voice their opinions on the blog, without even a notation of whether or not a person is a free or subscribing member unless the player makes the announcement themselves, that incinuates to me that even EA seems to at least care what *everybody* who plays thinks, whether they are paying to play or not. I don't think anybody who is still here through all the thick and thin should be looked down upon based on their economic status as being second class, because we aren't able to know *why* a person might be a free player rather than a premium one.....and there's enough 'division lines' withut creating yet another one, right? At least that's my personal opinion. I've got total respect for anybody who takes the time and energy to get involved in the process and be constructive and productive equally, whether they are paying $0 a month, $10 a month for 1 account, or $100 a month for 10 accounts, which if you're gonna say that free players shouldn't have a voice then it follows the same logic that a person with 10 accounts should have more say-so than a person with 1.
[/ QUOTE ]
umm.... everyone who posted in this thread was still allowed to post... and can continue to post... so what are you crying about? Jackiee is entitled to her opinion too.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, if you believe that it's OK for someone to say that free players are inconsequential and shouldn't have a voice, then oooookay, but if that's true then the rest of us are entitled to our opinions that it that belief is BS, and to give our points that back that up, so why you say she's entitled to her opinion, and then turn around and say that it is 'crying' when others disagree with that opinion is totally beyond me, and seems more like the double standard that we who hold staff at a higher level of behavior than the average poste are accused of.
Cest la vie.
[/ QUOTE ]
Starting the staff nonsense in this thread too?
Speak with Rizzo.
If EA put their free players over their paying players, what motivation would that leave for people to still play.
If you want to believe that your subscription matters as much as mine, go ahead. But I'm telling you its not the case.
Free play was put there as a way to get people in the game. I assure you EA as a corporation would hope that every Free play account would upgrade to paying.
[/ QUOTE ]
Nobody is over anybody else, subscription-wise. Not founders over everybody else, not we premium players over free players, not free players over premium players. My point was that everybody has an equal voice, it does not matter what *kind* of player they are. I wasn't suggesting that anybody be over anybody else, I was stating that they ARE NOT and why they are not.
Of course EA want everybody to upgrade their accounts if they are free players to premium players, but they know that they are going to do that is NOT by treating free players as if they are second class citizens, the way you seem to think they should be treated, it is through the restrictions that are placed on the GAMEPLAY of the restricted accounts, whilst everybody who plays, whether they pay or not, has the same *voice* within the game. I hope this clears the matter up.