Hum, UOSA Classic Client seems to me to be

[EnigmaMaitreya]

The UOSA Classic Client seem to me to be ... an improved performance client over the old 2D client.

I am not quite sure I can put my finger on why I say this, but things just seem to move better, less jumpiness, lag etc.

 

[Taylor]

*cue swell of relief*

 

[EnigmaMaitreya]

He he, if this turns out to be real / sustainable, then the reason for me to go to the Enhanced Client dwindles to just the enhancements in Macros etc.

 

[Tina Small]

Could be purely a server issue, Enigma, especially if they have Retribution on its own server to be able to monitor performance more accurately.

 

[EnigmaMaitreya]

I concede this but New Haven tends to be a bit of a performance test with all the crap on the ground and the players, especially close to a new server publish.

Both New Haven and the Gargoyle Town did nothing to slow down or alter the smooth movement of my character.

I am kind of missing the Rune Book with some of the Dungeons though.

 

[Tina Small]

I concede this but New Haven tends to be a bit of a performance test with all the crap on the ground and the players, especially close to a new server publish.

Both New Haven and the Gargoyle Town did nothing to slow down or alter the smooth movement of my character.

I am kind of missing the Rune Book with some of the Dungeons though.

I'm debating whether or not to do another rune library on Retribution. Have done two already; not sure I'm up to doing a third one. LOL If I do, I'll post directions on how to get to the house.

 

[Myna]

have crashes with sa classic, almost no crashes with classic client.

with sa classic scrolling the landscape while moving isnt smooth like in regular classic.

at least for me

 

[Taylor]

have crashes with sa classic, almost no crashes with classic client.

with sa classic scrolling the landscape while moving isnt smooth like in regular classic.

at least for me

The crashes are linked to the shard (Retribution), not to the 2d enhanced client.