Please allow combining Powder of Fortification like upcoming runic tools combining.
House co-ownership should be on an account basis, not on a per-character basis.And also please make it so 70 people can Co-own a House, as MalagAste has so passionately implored!!
Oh I agree... but I hate being just a "friend" in my own house. Friends can NOT SECURE items. This means as a "Friend" I can't place containers... also a PITA... But I shouldn't BE a friend in my OWN house... I should be a Co-owner or owner. If all my stinking accounts are linked now via the silly account migration BS then they should know I AM the owner.House co-ownership should be on an account basis, not on a per-character basis.
Having to co-own all my chars one at a time is a PITA.
/signed
also one thing that would be real nice for PoF would be a context menu that you could choose to fully powder an item with one shot
Now that's a cool approach. I might considering upping how much the BOD reward could hold a bit. Maybe 25 for the BOD reward....
Hmm...
How about: Partial jars of powder from BOD rewards should be able to combine into each other for a max of 10 charges per jar.
In addition, allow glasscrafters to craft a Large Jar which can hold up to 100 charges of PoF. (2 stones empty + 1 stone per 10 powder charges weight).
Like that....
Hmm...
How about: Partial jars of powder from BOD rewards should be able to combine into each other for a max of 10 charges per jar.
In addition, allow glasscrafters to craft a Large Jar which can hold up to 100 charges of PoF. (2 stones empty + 1 stone per 10 powder charges weight).
No way, keep it simple....
Hmm...
How about: Partial jars of powder from BOD rewards should be able to combine into each other for a max of 10 charges per jar.
In addition, allow glasscrafters to craft a Large Jar which can hold up to 100 charges of PoF. (2 stones empty + 1 stone per 10 powder charges weight).
alrighty how bout an item or addon: The Powder Keg-can be filled with Powder of Fortification or Powder of Translocation. Fills at 1000 charges. Is able to "Dispense" powder in increments of your choosing.I am for it, but I can very easily explain the no votes -
Rares Collectors are voting "no" because several EMs used 50-use POFs as event prizes several years ago, and they are, of course, now non-spawning rares.
Nothing that is a consumable as part of normal crafting (i.e. Dyes aren't crafting, but deco in nature, while POF is pretty much mandatory for imbuing) should ever be considered a rare.
New item requires new code to implement. New code may contain new bugs. Less chances to get it working after all.alrighty how bout an item or addon
Not really, they could just use the same code they use for potion kegs. This would be a great help if they at least make them and other stuff STACK.New item requires new code to implement. New code may contain new bugs. Less chances to get it working after all.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but simply allowing the POF to stack into each other is going to require new code too.New item requires new code to implement. New code may contain new bugs. Less chances to get it working after all.
I voted no as it'sI am for it, but I can very easily explain the no votes -
Rares Collectors are voting "no" because several EMs used 50-use POFs as event prizes several years ago, and they are, of course, now non-spawning rares.
Nothing that is a consumable as part of normal crafting (i.e. Dyes aren't crafting, but deco in nature, while POF is pretty much mandatory for imbuing) should ever be considered a rare.
Ah, this has bugged me about the EC ever since I started using it. That would be another good fix to restore more of the classic client's look to the EC.Another thing that I hate that they took out for the new client, is the double stacked item graphics.
Me too! Sometimes that graphic is preferred. How are you supposed to know there is more than one thing there without mousing over?Ah, this has bugged me about the EC ever since I started using it. That would be another good fix to restore more of the classic client's look to the EC.Another thing that I hate that they took out for the new client, is the double stacked item graphics.