Again, for what purpose? It works just fine the way it is right now. Why should the spell be changed to require yet another skill be added to a template that's already cramped as hell?Connor it would be to give Necros that use VE a boost.
Wraith form is completely different from Vamp form. It has a much lower requirement to cast, so involves much less skill points to utilize. The addition of Spirit Speak balances that out.What would be the Point of taking 99 Necro at this point? Since, were going to have atleast that much necro to cast, & keep. Why not tie to SS, & give a little boost over its Current effectiveness?
No, it won't.If it works for Wraith Form it should work for VE to.
No it doesn't. It hurts them more than helps.Look at this way it rewards those that go the Necro Route.
Correction: Only warriors who want the best of everything without having to pay for it need this kind of skill. I know ALOT of necro/dexers who run 50 Necro/120 SS to do wraith-form leeching (and it isnt a LITTLE bonus, by the way ... if you have no SS you leech next to nothing in wraith form), and of course they take benefit of Curse Weapon and other low end necro spells. Some have bushido, most dont - it really isnt necessary. Can you imagine if they had incentive to take their necro higher?still not a good thing... because only warriors may need this kind of skill and they cant use it... the result is a waste of the devs time...
Stupid. The spell already has a 99 necro requirement to cast. Anyone who still uses this spell after the upcoming change will have SS anyway.Why not tie Vampiric Forms life leech to Spirit Speak? Just like Mana Leech works for Wraith.
Spirit Speak over 100 could apply a small bonus to life leech.
Good, Bad, or Stupid what do you think?
What you don't think people won't simply use a soulstone to flush SS off their templates when they adjust their sampires?Stupid. The spell already has a 99 necro requirement to cast. Anyone who still uses this spell after the upcoming change will have SS anyway.
Partly accurate. For example, I just finished off reworking some skills to swap out for SS when I don't need it. GM Anatomy, Resist, and SS are all interchangeable depending on what I'm fighting.Stupid. The spell already has a 99 necro requirement to cast. Anyone who still uses this spell after the upcoming change will have SS anyway.
Most people will not be building another template around 99 necromancy with no SS. That would just be a big waste of 99 skill. Think however you will, you are what is referred to as anomoly...Partly accurate. For example, I just finished off reworking some skills to swap out for SS when I don't need it. GM Anatomy, Resist, and SS are all interchangeable depending on what I'm fighting.
What you don't think people won't simply use a soulstone to flush SS off their templates when they adjust their sampires?
Well, I guess "anomoly" is a lot better than some of the things I've been called here.Most people will not be building another template around 99 necromancy with no SS. That would just be a big waste of 99 skill. Think however you will, you are what is referred to as anomoly...
Party accurate? pffft!
I wasnt being negative...saying you are an anomoly just states that you are thinking outside of the box. I agree this is a viable option however most will not, seeing as to the amount of skill being spent just to use one (*and only one) spell.Well, I guess "anomoly" is a lot better than some of the things I've been called here.
Granted, not many people have a bunch of soulstones they can use to swap skills out like that, but it is a viable option that I take full advantage of.
Oh I know. I was just "funnin'", as they say here in Texas.I wasnt being negative...saying you are an anomoly just states that you are thinking outside of the box. the exception of forms and curse wep...which has limited use without SS
Most people will not be building another template around 99 necromancy with no SS. That would just be a big waste of 99 skill. Think however you will, you are what is referred to as anomoly...
Party accurate? pffft!