"
A Fanatic is someone that knows all the answers and doesn't even bother to find out the questions." Amos Oz.
Thank you very much for your valuable input. However I wasn't asking for yet another generality stating that for sure there must be some law that sanctions what you disagree with.
If you would have taken the time to carefully read my post with an open mind you probably would have understood my point.
For fun, let's separate this issue into 2 separate threads:
1. Search Engine.
I have just read the License Agreement very carefully. It surely doesn't state anywhere that
POSTING online informations about vendor content is sanctioned by ToS. So it is in no violation of any "contract". It is legal.
(for all the quick readers please go back to previous line and read the bold word with capital letters).
(please read
http://www.uo.com/agreement.html before posting opinions of what is and what is not legal).
Aquiring information about vendor content using scripts is in violation of Section 5, point (d):
5. Rights and Responsibilities.
(d) Official Service. Ultima Online has been designed by EA.com for play only on the Service. The Software is licensed to you for play on the Service only. EA.comdoes not grant you a license to use the Software for any other purpose. You agree to play Ultima Online only on the Service and not through any other means. You further agree not to create or provide any other means through which Ultima Online may be played by others - for example, through server emulators. You may not reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the Software, including any proprietary communications protocol used by the Software. You acknowledge that you do not have the right to create, publish, distribute, create derivative works from or use any software programs, utilities, applications, emulators or tools derived from or created for Ultima Online unless specifically authorized in writing by EA.com.
All EA could do about it is to terminate the account that is using scripting search. They have no ground for demanding anything else, RL compensations or legal sanctions. No prejudice has been created, real or abstract.
I personally don't even think termination would be their first choice. For first-time offender accounts they may choose jail and a few days ban. I imagine a jail cell filled with like 20-30 Plague necromancers and a guy that said p***y in general chat.

In the end, this is no more "illegal" than macroing a necro spell at luna bank using the "little iron cube forgotten on the keyboard" and taking a bathroom break.
(
Here I would like to insert what I think is a big issue: Why did EA drop account creation verification through email / valid credid card?? You can basically create hundreds of accounts daily providing false email adresses and data. You just have to use an IP change site to avoid the 10 account limit on the official site. This is in no way helping them stop fowl use of trial accounts. My guess is they use the total number of accounts (vet and trials) for funding or commercial use so it's in their interest to keep this situation going.....)
There was another angry poster on this thread that compared search engines with real life robbery. Really? Very mature.
Exactly who is damaged by the search and what does the loss consist of??
2. Selling Gold and Items for RL cash.
Quote from EA agreement :
5. Rights and Responsibilities.
(a)Content. You acknowledge that: (i) the Software and the Service contain graphics, sound effects, music, animation-style video and text (collectively, "Content"), and (ii) Content may be provided under license by independent content providers, including text contributions from other Members.
(c) Rights. You acknowledge and agree that all characters created, and items acquired and developed as a result of game play are part of the Software and Service and are the sole property of EA.com.
So basically everything in game is EA property. Including the names of our characters and their murder counts and RP diseases. Everything. When you trade in game 2000 valorite ingots for a 1mil check, you are in fact trading temporarily usage rights for that item/check to another person/player, EA being the real owner. We are like children in a playhouse switching balls and toy trucks, but can't take any toy when we leave home. It's not like you could put that ankh of sacrifice on the shelf of your RL bookcase. Or take your lovely greater dragon for a RL walk in the park.
11. General Provisions.
You may not use, copy, modify, sublicense, rent, sell, assign or transfer the rights or obligations granted to you in this Agreement, except as expressly provided in this Agreement. Any assignment in violation of this Agreement is void, except that you may transfer your Account to another person provided that person accepts the terms of this Service Agreement.
Ok, this is a bit ambiguous for me, and reading the following paragraphs of the section made me even fuzzier.
If you go to the section 5 Rights and Responsibilities, and you see they mention ingame content, one could argue that this is how they sanction gold and item selling for RL cash.
But I feel that only applies for "rights and obligations" abstract notions as in I'm obligated to admit EA owns my ethereal horse, not applies for the actual ethy horse. So I could
TRADE THE USE OF that ethy horse to someone that pays me RL money for this service I provide. I provide a kind of intermediary trading service, I do not provide the horse. EA still owns that damn horse.
Further, they even aknowledge our rights to trade our accounts. Very good, we need that. Now there is no mention that we are forbidden to receive money for trading that account. Also, there is no mention that the account should be "a whole entity", so i guess we could expand this "exception" for parts of our account. That would mean again that ethy horse, and a seemingly acceptance from EA to sell (again) THE USE OF that ethy horse to someone else. Or at least the lack of any sanction for doing it.
I'm not saying uo cash and items should be sold for RL money. This is between who has more money than they need and the ones that want to part with the items they aquired in game. It's all about friggin' pixels after all, pixels owned by EA, never by any of us.
conclusion:
Gold sellers have been around from before the year 2000. I never heard in more than a decade for anyone being arrested for selling UO gold. Maybe because it is not illegal??
PS (took me more than 2 hours to research and write this. please respect that)