I've gone mad also with these type of macros, i think there is a conceptual (think it's the word) problem with the TARGET macros, target next/nearest blah blah and Cursor target current look close, but this is not the same, first group only change your current target, i mean, don't trigger the action, only change the target, if you want that the macro USE that target, need the last, the one Fink added.
I think, to even do a shorter macro, you dont need to open the corpse to get the essence (last part), only using the plant over corpses works, it goes straight to your backpack if you are lucky.
I think I understand.I've gone mad also with these type of macros, i think there is a conceptual (think it's the word) problem with the TARGET macros, target next/nearest blah blah and Cursor target current look close, but this is not the same, first group only change your current target, i mean, don't trigger the action, only change the target, if you want that the macro USE that target, need the last, the one Fink added.
Devs should change this a little to evade missunderstanding.
Did i explain myself??
I do my best with my english, sorry
Ahh... this starts to make sense, thinking of it that way.I think I understand.
I feel there's something backward about targeting. More often than not I've found having the target selected before you need it works better than the more intuitive order of action first, target second. ...
Don't forget to openly mock the Classic Client users as you abscond with all the treats..
